Relations between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan: Is this America's next move against Russia?
Relations between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan: Is this America's next move against Russia?

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
July 12, 2025

Relations between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan: Is this America's next move against Russia?

Relations between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan

Is this America's next move against Russia?

News:

President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev arrived in Baku on an official visit at the invitation of President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan. (Website of the Uzbek Presidency)

Comment:

At the conclusion of the talks held in Baku, Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Ilham Aliyev issued a decision on the second meeting of the Supreme Interstate Council. A number of bilateral documents were exchanged between the heads of state. Mirziyoyev also participated in the 17th summit of the Economic Cooperation Organization in the city of Khankendi on July 4. The event, chaired by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, was attended by the leaders of Iran, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Afghanistan, the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Asaad Majeed Khan, and heads of delegations from other countries and regional organizations.

When we focus on these, we can understand that this is another attempt by the West, led by America, to provoke Russia in Asia, undermine its power, and reduce its ultimate influence, while questioning its strength. For example, the meeting of Mirziyoyev and the heads of other CIS states in Azerbaijan itself seems to encourage them in some way to be bolder against Russia. Because Azerbaijan, at the moment, is surprising everyone with bold statements against Russia and is trying to show this in practice as well. For example, in response to the raids organized by the Russian security forces against Azerbaijani nationals, which resulted in the death of two of them, Azerbaijan also carried out exhibition campaigns against the Russians. The Azerbaijani state television harshly criticizes the policy of the Russian bear, saying, "Mr. Putin, what happened?"

In this regard, special emphasis is given to the fact that the infidel Russian regime views not only the Azerbaijanis, but also the fraternal peoples consisting of Kyrgyz, Kazakhs, Tajiks, Turkmens, and Uzbeks, as second-class people.

It is worth mentioning that Mirziyoyev's visit to Azerbaijan took place in light of the further deterioration of relations between Russia and Azerbaijan. If we look closely, the Uzbek regime, which claims leadership in Central Asia, cannot go beyond dealing very softly with Russia. However, in Central Asia, if we say that Uzbekistan is the most harmed by infidel Russia, it would not be an exaggeration. This is clearly manifested in Russia's interference in our country's economy, all the way to the severe repression of Uzbek Muslims.

It seems that other countries in the region, especially Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan, are daring to some extent or in some cases to confront Russia. Uzbekistan, which is considered the heart of the region, seems to be pulling everyone back in this regard. Although our country and people are subjected to the greatest harm and injustice from Russia, the Uzbek regime turns a blind eye to all of this under the pretext of not spoiling relations with Russia! However, positioning Central Asia against Russia and reducing its influence as much as possible will not be achieved without Uzbekistan. From this standpoint, Mirziyoyev's visit to Azerbaijan is a suitable opportunity to encourage him to be bolder against Russia. As if Azerbaijan can be a clear model for everyone, especially Uzbekistan, in this regard. Here, Moscow does not respond to Azerbaijan's actions against it with the same severity. It seems from this that there is an implicit recognition that the Putin regime has weakened significantly in foreign policy recently, and that the military force it boasts about cannot be relied upon much now.

It is true that during the negotiations that took place, and in several meetings, Russia was not mentioned in any way, but it is not difficult to realize that this meaning lies at its core. Of course, the West, especially America, stands behind this, as it is unlikely that Azerbaijan would dare to confront Russia alone. There is almost no doubt that it is America that gives it this courage through Turkey. Perhaps this is the price of joining the Abraham Accords, because Azerbaijan, by joining this agreement, wants to obtain American support. With this, it seems that it has taken upon itself the task of distancing the countries of Central Asia, including Uzbekistan, from Russia under the name of Turkish unity.

It is true that it is very important to unite against Russia, and at the same time it is a convenient situation to effectively benefit from the deterioration of Russia in light of the Ukrainian crisis. But such unity and resistance should not serve the interests of America or other colonial countries, because in such a case it will only lead to replacing one master who is no less evil than the other! These evil countries present the Islamic countries with this particular option, the option of accepting one of the two evils! However, there is another option which is the right thing to do to achieve unity, glory and power, which is to turn to Islam and submit to it, and unite on its basis, and apply it under the Caliphate, then the control of the infidels over the Muslims will be completely eliminated, and the victory of God will be with us.

﴿And Allah will never give the disbelievers over the believers a way [to overcome them].﴾

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Central

Islam Abu Khalil - Uzbekistan

More from News & Commentary

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

(Translated)

News:

The high-level United Nations international conference entitled "Finding a Peaceful Solution to the Palestinian Issue and Implementing the Two-State Solution" was held in New York on July 29 and 30, led by France and Saudi Arabia. Following the conference, which aimed to recognize Palestine as a state and end the war in Gaza, a joint declaration was signed. In addition to the European Union and the League of Arab States, Turkey also signed the declaration along with 17 other countries. The declaration, which consisted of 42 articles and an annex, condemned Operation Al-Aqsa Flood carried out by Hamas. The participating countries called on Hamas to lay down its weapons and demanded that it hand over its administration to the Mahmoud Abbas regime. (Agencies, July 31, 2025).

Comment:

Considering the countries running the conference, the presence of America is clearly evident, and despite not having the authority or influence to make decisions, the Saudi regime, its servant, accompanying France is the clearest evidence of this.

In this regard, French President Emmanuel Macron stated on July 24 that France would officially recognize the Palestinian state in September, and would be the first G7 country to do so. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barreau held a press conference at the conference, announcing the goals of the New York Declaration. In fact, in the statement issued after the conference, the massacres of the Jewish entity were condemned without taking any punitive decision against it, and Hamas was asked to disarm and hand over the administration of Gaza to Mahmoud Abbas.

In the new Middle East strategy that America seeks to implement based on the Abraham Accords, the Salman regime represents the spearhead. Normalization with the Jewish entity will begin after the war, with Saudi Arabia; then other countries will follow, and this wave will turn into a strategic alliance extending from North Africa to Pakistan. The Jewish entity will also receive a security guarantee as an important part of this alliance; then America will use this alliance as fuel in its conflict against China and Russia, and to include Europe completely under its wings, and of course, against the possibility of establishing the Caliphate.

The obstacle to this plan currently is the war in Gaza and then the anger of the Ummah, which is increasing and is about to explode. Therefore, the United States preferred that the European Union, the Arab regimes, and Turkey take the initiative in the New York Declaration. Thinking that accepting the decisions contained in the declaration would be easier.

As for the Arab regimes and Turkey, their mission is to please the United States, protect the Jewish entity, and in return for this obedience, protect themselves from the anger of their peoples, and live a humiliating life with the crumbs of cheap power until they are thrown away or afflicted with the torment of the afterlife. Turkey's reservation on the declaration, on the condition that the so-called two-state solution plan is implemented, is only an attempt to cover up the real goal of the declaration and mislead Muslims, and it has no real value.

In conclusion, the path to liberating Gaza and all of Palestine is not through a fictitious state in which Jews live. The Islamic solution for Palestine is the rule of Islam in the usurped land, which is to fight the usurper, and to mobilize the armies of Muslims to uproot the Jews from the blessed land. The permanent and radical solution is to establish the Rightly Guided Caliphate and protect the blessed land of Isra and Mi'raj with the shield of the Caliphate. God willing, those days are not far away.

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims will kill them, until the Jew hides behind the stone and the tree, and the stone or the tree says: O Muslim, O servant of God, there is a Jew behind me, so come and kill him." (Narrated by Muslim)

Written for the Central Media Office radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Muhammad Amin Yildirim

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

The News:

Most of the political and security news in Lebanon revolves around the issue of weapons targeting the Jewish entity, without any other weapons, and focusing on it by most political analysts and journalists.

Comment:

America is asking for the weapons that fought the Jews to be handed over to the Lebanese army, and it does not care about any weapons that remain in the hands of all the people, which can be used internally when it finds an interest in doing so, or between Muslims in neighboring countries.

America, the greatest enemy of us Muslims, said it frankly, even rudely, when its envoy Barack stated from Lebanon that the weapon that must be handed over to the Lebanese state is the weapon that can be used against the Jewish entity occupying blessed Palestine, and not any other individual or medium weapon because this does not harm the Jewish entity, but rather serves it and serves America and the entire West in inciting it to fight between Muslims under the pretext of takfiris, extremists, reactionaries, or backward people, or other descriptions that they fuel among Muslims under the pretext of sectarianism, nationalism, or ethnicity, or even between Muslims and others who have lived with us for hundreds of years and found nothing from us but the preservation of honor, money, and life, and that we were applying the laws to them as we apply them to ourselves, they have what we have and they are obligated to do what we are obligated to do. For the Sharia ruling is the basis of governance for Muslims, whether among themselves, or between them and other subjects of the state.

As long as our greatest enemy, America, wants to destroy or neutralize the weapon that harms the Jewish entity, then why focus on that among politicians and media professionals?!

Why are the most important topics raised in the media and in the Council of Ministers, at the request of the American enemy, without examining them in depth and clarifying the extent of their danger to the nation, the most dangerous of which is the demarcation of the land borders with the Jewish entity, that is, the official recognition of this occupying entity, in a way that no one after that has the right to carry weapons, any weapons, for the sake of Palestine, which is the property of all Muslims and not only the people of Palestine, as they try to convince us as if it belongs only to the people of Palestine?!

The danger lies in presenting this matter sometimes under the title of peace, sometimes under the title of reconciliation, and at other times under the title of security in the region, or under the title of economic, tourism and political prosperity, and the prosperity that they promise Muslims in the event of recognition of this monstrous entity!

America knows very well that Muslims can never be satisfied with recognizing the Jewish entity, and that is why you see it creeping into them through other things to distract them from the most important fateful matter. Yes, America wants us to focus on the issue of weapons, but it knows that weapons, no matter how powerful, will not work and cannot be used against the Jewish entity if official Lebanon recognizes it by demarcating the borders with it, and thus recognizes it and its right to the land of blessed Palestine, under the pretext of the Muslim rulers and the Palestinian Authority.

This recognition of the Jewish entity is a betrayal of God, His Messenger, and the believers, and of all the blood of the martyrs that has been shed and continues to be shed for the liberation of Palestine, and despite all that, we still hope for good in our nation, some of whom are fighting in Gaza, Hashim, and in Palestine, and they say to us with their blood: We will never recognize the Jewish entity, even if it costs us all this and more... So, do we accept in Lebanon to recognize the Jewish entity, no matter how difficult the circumstances are?! Do we accept to demarcate the borders with it, that is, to recognize it, even if the weapons are left with us?! It is the question that we must answer before it is too late.

Written for the Central Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Dr. Muhammad Jaber

Head of the Central Communications Committee of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Lebanon