The War in Sudan and the Implementation of the Slow Erosion Plan
The War in Sudan and the Implementation of the Slow Erosion Plan

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
June 22, 2025

The War in Sudan and the Implementation of the Slow Erosion Plan

The War in Sudan and the Implementation of the Slow Erosion Plan

News:

In a Sudan Tribune report dated Wednesday, June 18, 2025, entitled: "Desert and Border War Ignites Sudan and Raises Fears of Foreign Intervention," it stated: "The Rapid Support Forces' control over the Jebel Uweinat area and the strategic border triangle between Sudan, Egypt, and Libya represents a different trend in terms of positioning and securing supplies."

Comment:

The war in Sudan between the army and the Rapid Support Forces has completed its third month of its third year without being decided for either side. Rather, it is clear that the two sides are competing to seize new areas and withdraw from others in a suspiciously remarkable manner, as is the case with the withdrawal of the Rapid Support Forces from Khartoum and then the seizure of the city of Al-Nuhud and a number of cities in West Kordofan, and the withdrawal of the army from it and a number of cities and states, the latest of which is the strategic border triangle between Sudan, Egypt and Libya.

But there is a question that has remained stuck in the minds of the people of Sudan: Why do the army leaders not want to resolve this battle?! And what does that have to do with fourth or fifth generation wars?!

It has become clear to every follower that this war has a special agenda that is revealed by the suspicious withdrawals and the failure to release the reins that the army personnel have repeatedly demanded, but they have not found a listening ear from the leaders associated with America in particular.

This is because the war targets a dirty American plan to strike at the British influence represented by the civilian forces led by former Prime Minister Abdullah Hamdok, and then the project to divide Sudan that is taking place in Darfur at full speed. May Allah foil their plan and disappoint their omen. All of this that is happening explains the prolongation of the war despite the absence of convincing reasons for its outbreak, or its continuation by various means and methods. However, Professor Max Manwaring, a military strategy expert at the Institute for Studies at the US War College, expressed this in the lecture spread on YouTube to which senior officers from NATO and the Jewish army were invited in 2018.

Where that lecture reveals what is happening in Sudan of conflict between civilians and the military, and of fighting between the army and the Rapid Support Forces.

Professor Max began his lecture by saying that "the method of traditional wars has become old, and the new is the fourth generation of war"!!

He said verbatim: "The goal is not to destroy the military establishment of a nation, or to destroy its military capabilities, but rather the goal is exhaustion and slow erosion, but steadily. Our goal is to force the enemy to submit to our will!" He adds: "The goal is to destabilize," "and this destabilization is carried out by citizens of the enemy state to create a failed state... Here we can control... and this process is carried out in steps... slowly and quietly and using citizens of the enemy state, so your enemy will wake up dead..."!

The most striking thing in this lecture is the phrase: "Exhaustion, and slow erosion." Slow erosion means spreading destruction and chaos in the cities, turning people into wandering herds, and paralyzing the enemy country's ability to meet basic needs... as he says, "In this type of war, you may see dead children or the elderly, so don't be alarmed"!

He says: "The exhaustion strategy means moving the war from one front to another, and from one land to another, and draining all the capabilities of the enemy state in spaced stages, and making the "enemy state" fight on multiple fronts surrounded by local hyenas from all sides, and planning to heat up one front and calm another, i.e. continuing to manage the crisis and not resolving it" end of quote.

This is what is happening now in the war in Sudan; There are hyenas, foxes, and snakes that are managing the war and do not want this war to end until it achieves its American agenda; As that is implemented by America's agents from the leaders of the armed forces in the army and the Rapid Support Forces.

This bleeding of the country will not stop unless the people of Sudan are aware of this catastrophic criminal plan and take action against these agents and cut off the influence of America and other colonial countries, and that will only be by establishing the Rightly Guided Khilafah according to the method of Prophethood. This is the duty of the sincere leaders in the army in Sudan; To strike with an iron fist against the agents and give victory to the sincere sons of the Ummah to establish the Rightly Guided Khilafah according to the method of Prophethood, for in it is the solution and salvation. Al-Arbad bin Sariya reported from the Prophet ﷺ who said: «For whoever among you lives will see much disagreement, so adhere to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs, cling to it with your molar teeth» narrated by Abu Dawood and Ahmad.

And it must be known that establishing the Khilafah is obligatory, and whoever is late in establishing it is sinful. `Abdullah bin `Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, reported that the Prophet ﷺ said: «And whoever dies without a pledge of allegiance on his neck dies a death of ignorance» narrated by Muslim.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Muhammad Jamea (Abu Ayman)

Assistant Official Spokesman of Hizb ut Tahrir in the Wilayah of Sudan

More from News & Commentary

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

(Translated)

News:

The high-level United Nations international conference entitled "Finding a Peaceful Solution to the Palestinian Issue and Implementing the Two-State Solution" was held in New York on July 29 and 30, led by France and Saudi Arabia. Following the conference, which aimed to recognize Palestine as a state and end the war in Gaza, a joint declaration was signed. In addition to the European Union and the League of Arab States, Turkey also signed the declaration along with 17 other countries. The declaration, which consisted of 42 articles and an annex, condemned Operation Al-Aqsa Flood carried out by Hamas. The participating countries called on Hamas to lay down its weapons and demanded that it hand over its administration to the Mahmoud Abbas regime. (Agencies, July 31, 2025).

Comment:

Considering the countries running the conference, the presence of America is clearly evident, and despite not having the authority or influence to make decisions, the Saudi regime, its servant, accompanying France is the clearest evidence of this.

In this regard, French President Emmanuel Macron stated on July 24 that France would officially recognize the Palestinian state in September, and would be the first G7 country to do so. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barreau held a press conference at the conference, announcing the goals of the New York Declaration. In fact, in the statement issued after the conference, the massacres of the Jewish entity were condemned without taking any punitive decision against it, and Hamas was asked to disarm and hand over the administration of Gaza to Mahmoud Abbas.

In the new Middle East strategy that America seeks to implement based on the Abraham Accords, the Salman regime represents the spearhead. Normalization with the Jewish entity will begin after the war, with Saudi Arabia; then other countries will follow, and this wave will turn into a strategic alliance extending from North Africa to Pakistan. The Jewish entity will also receive a security guarantee as an important part of this alliance; then America will use this alliance as fuel in its conflict against China and Russia, and to include Europe completely under its wings, and of course, against the possibility of establishing the Caliphate.

The obstacle to this plan currently is the war in Gaza and then the anger of the Ummah, which is increasing and is about to explode. Therefore, the United States preferred that the European Union, the Arab regimes, and Turkey take the initiative in the New York Declaration. Thinking that accepting the decisions contained in the declaration would be easier.

As for the Arab regimes and Turkey, their mission is to please the United States, protect the Jewish entity, and in return for this obedience, protect themselves from the anger of their peoples, and live a humiliating life with the crumbs of cheap power until they are thrown away or afflicted with the torment of the afterlife. Turkey's reservation on the declaration, on the condition that the so-called two-state solution plan is implemented, is only an attempt to cover up the real goal of the declaration and mislead Muslims, and it has no real value.

In conclusion, the path to liberating Gaza and all of Palestine is not through a fictitious state in which Jews live. The Islamic solution for Palestine is the rule of Islam in the usurped land, which is to fight the usurper, and to mobilize the armies of Muslims to uproot the Jews from the blessed land. The permanent and radical solution is to establish the Rightly Guided Caliphate and protect the blessed land of Isra and Mi'raj with the shield of the Caliphate. God willing, those days are not far away.

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims will kill them, until the Jew hides behind the stone and the tree, and the stone or the tree says: O Muslim, O servant of God, there is a Jew behind me, so come and kill him." (Narrated by Muslim)

Written for the Central Media Office radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Muhammad Amin Yildirim

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

The News:

Most of the political and security news in Lebanon revolves around the issue of weapons targeting the Jewish entity, without any other weapons, and focusing on it by most political analysts and journalists.

Comment:

America is asking for the weapons that fought the Jews to be handed over to the Lebanese army, and it does not care about any weapons that remain in the hands of all the people, which can be used internally when it finds an interest in doing so, or between Muslims in neighboring countries.

America, the greatest enemy of us Muslims, said it frankly, even rudely, when its envoy Barack stated from Lebanon that the weapon that must be handed over to the Lebanese state is the weapon that can be used against the Jewish entity occupying blessed Palestine, and not any other individual or medium weapon because this does not harm the Jewish entity, but rather serves it and serves America and the entire West in inciting it to fight between Muslims under the pretext of takfiris, extremists, reactionaries, or backward people, or other descriptions that they fuel among Muslims under the pretext of sectarianism, nationalism, or ethnicity, or even between Muslims and others who have lived with us for hundreds of years and found nothing from us but the preservation of honor, money, and life, and that we were applying the laws to them as we apply them to ourselves, they have what we have and they are obligated to do what we are obligated to do. For the Sharia ruling is the basis of governance for Muslims, whether among themselves, or between them and other subjects of the state.

As long as our greatest enemy, America, wants to destroy or neutralize the weapon that harms the Jewish entity, then why focus on that among politicians and media professionals?!

Why are the most important topics raised in the media and in the Council of Ministers, at the request of the American enemy, without examining them in depth and clarifying the extent of their danger to the nation, the most dangerous of which is the demarcation of the land borders with the Jewish entity, that is, the official recognition of this occupying entity, in a way that no one after that has the right to carry weapons, any weapons, for the sake of Palestine, which is the property of all Muslims and not only the people of Palestine, as they try to convince us as if it belongs only to the people of Palestine?!

The danger lies in presenting this matter sometimes under the title of peace, sometimes under the title of reconciliation, and at other times under the title of security in the region, or under the title of economic, tourism and political prosperity, and the prosperity that they promise Muslims in the event of recognition of this monstrous entity!

America knows very well that Muslims can never be satisfied with recognizing the Jewish entity, and that is why you see it creeping into them through other things to distract them from the most important fateful matter. Yes, America wants us to focus on the issue of weapons, but it knows that weapons, no matter how powerful, will not work and cannot be used against the Jewish entity if official Lebanon recognizes it by demarcating the borders with it, and thus recognizes it and its right to the land of blessed Palestine, under the pretext of the Muslim rulers and the Palestinian Authority.

This recognition of the Jewish entity is a betrayal of God, His Messenger, and the believers, and of all the blood of the martyrs that has been shed and continues to be shed for the liberation of Palestine, and despite all that, we still hope for good in our nation, some of whom are fighting in Gaza, Hashim, and in Palestine, and they say to us with their blood: We will never recognize the Jewish entity, even if it costs us all this and more... So, do we accept in Lebanon to recognize the Jewish entity, no matter how difficult the circumstances are?! Do we accept to demarcate the borders with it, that is, to recognize it, even if the weapons are left with us?! It is the question that we must answer before it is too late.

Written for the Central Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Dr. Muhammad Jaber

Head of the Central Communications Committee of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Lebanon