Political Repression of Pro-Palestine Opposition in Britain

On July 5, 2025, the British government announced a ban on Palestine Action, a peaceful campaign organization targeting British military support for the Jewish entity committing genocide in Gaza. It was banned under anti-terrorism law, making expressing support for the organization illegal and punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper banned the organization after its members sprayed red paint on Royal Air Force aircraft, but critics pointed out that this act was property damage, not violence.

0:00 0:00

Speed:

July 24, 2025

Political Repression of Pro-Palestine Opposition in Britain

Political Repression of Pro-Palestine Opposition in Britain

(Translated)

News:

In the weeks that followed, police arrested more than 100 people across the country under anti-terrorism laws, including an 83-year-old priest and retired Quakers. Armed officers even threatened to arrest those carrying signs reading "Free Gaza" or "Genocide."

Comment:

The first target was the Islamic opposition to Zionism, but now it is the turn of the political left in the United Kingdom. This brutal suppression of peaceful protest against genocide under the guise of combating terrorism is part of a deep-rooted campaign to distort any serious criticism of the Jewish entity as anti-Semitism, the mother of all crimes. The deification of Jews as a cover for supporting the Western Zionist project in the Middle East reached fantastical dimensions this week with the suspension of Labour MP Diane Abbott - the longest-serving black woman in the House of Commons - after defending her previous statements about racism.

Abbott wrote in 2023 that "Jews, Irish and migrants face prejudice similar to racism, but not throughout their lives in the same way that people of color do." Her distinction sparked a flood of accusations of anti-Semitism, and she apologized at the time but remains suspended. Abbott later told the BBC that she stood by the main point: "Obviously there is a difference between racism related to color and other types of racism, because you might see a migrant or Jewish person walking down the street and not know. You will only know if you stop to talk to them or are in a meeting with them. But if you see a black person walking down the street, you will immediately realize that he is black. They are two different types of racism." For this reason, the Labor Party immediately suspended her.

Former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell described Abbott's punishment for an interview in which she "explicitly condemned anti-Semitism and racism in all its forms" as "extremely bizarre," while more influential figures faced no punishment for using racist language.

Abbott's crime was the opposite of the Western doctrine that anti-Semitism is a unique evil, and saying that because Jews are generally difficult to identify in the United Kingdom, they are actually exposed to less racism than people of different skin colors. The false equation of opposition to the Jewish entity as anti-Semitism was used to justify Britain's ban on Hizb ut-Tahrir in January 2024. Home Secretary James Cleverly claimed that Hizb ut-Tahrir "actively promotes and encourages terrorism," for example by celebrating the October 7, 2023 attacks, even though it is widely known that the party operates on a purely political level.

Counter-terrorism analysts have warned for years that banning Hizb ut-Tahrir is therefore a political gesture and not a response to any terrorist threat. After the genocidal attack by the Jewish entity on Gaza following Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, criticism against the daily massacres against Palestinian civilians escalated, from Muslims and many other sectors of British society. Anti-Semitism was claimed to have increased significantly, but this was based on a malicious lie that criticizing the Jewish entity is anti-Semitic.

The mainstream media has downplayed the suffering of the Palestinians and showered disproportionate sympathy on the Zionist narrative. First, Hizb ut-Tahrir was banned, then the secular Palestine movement, and most recently, a Labour MP was punished for the second time. A climate of fear has prevailed, in which idle talk is criminalized. No one is immune from the charge of anti-Semitism; Neither Muslims, nor the left, nor even Jews are immune from the charge of anti-Semitism if they dare to oppose or even question the sacred doctrines that have distorted community discourse in the United Kingdom.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Dr. Abdullah Rubin

More from News & Commentary

August 15, 2025

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

(Translated)

News:

The high-level United Nations international conference entitled "Finding a Peaceful Solution to the Palestinian Issue and Implementing the Two-State Solution" was held in New York on July 29 and 30, led by France and Saudi Arabia. Following the conference, which aimed to recognize Palestine as a state and end the war in Gaza, a joint declaration was signed. In addition to the European Union and the League of Arab States, Turkey also signed the declaration along with 17 other countries. The declaration, which consisted of 42 articles and an annex, condemned Operation Al-Aqsa Flood carried out by Hamas. The participating countries called on Hamas to lay down its weapons and demanded that it hand over its administration to the Mahmoud Abbas regime. (Agencies, July 31, 2025).

Comment:

Considering the countries running the conference, the presence of America is clearly evident, and despite not having the authority or influence to make decisions, the Saudi regime, its servant, accompanying France is the clearest evidence of this.

In this regard, French President Emmanuel Macron stated on July 24 that France would officially recognize the Palestinian state in September, and would be the first G7 country to do so. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barreau held a press conference at the conference, announcing the goals of the New York Declaration. In fact, in the statement issued after the conference, the massacres of the Jewish entity were condemned without taking any punitive decision against it, and Hamas was asked to disarm and hand over the administration of Gaza to Mahmoud Abbas.

In the new Middle East strategy that America seeks to implement based on the Abraham Accords, the Salman regime represents the spearhead. Normalization with the Jewish entity will begin after the war, with Saudi Arabia; then other countries will follow, and this wave will turn into a strategic alliance extending from North Africa to Pakistan. The Jewish entity will also receive a security guarantee as an important part of this alliance; then America will use this alliance as fuel in its conflict against China and Russia, and to include Europe completely under its wings, and of course, against the possibility of establishing the Caliphate.

The obstacle to this plan currently is the war in Gaza and then the anger of the Ummah, which is increasing and is about to explode. Therefore, the United States preferred that the European Union, the Arab regimes, and Turkey take the initiative in the New York Declaration. Thinking that accepting the decisions contained in the declaration would be easier.

As for the Arab regimes and Turkey, their mission is to please the United States, protect the Jewish entity, and in return for this obedience, protect themselves from the anger of their peoples, and live a humiliating life with the crumbs of cheap power until they are thrown away or afflicted with the torment of the afterlife. Turkey's reservation on the declaration, on the condition that the so-called two-state solution plan is implemented, is only an attempt to cover up the real goal of the declaration and mislead Muslims, and it has no real value.

In conclusion, the path to liberating Gaza and all of Palestine is not through a fictitious state in which Jews live. The Islamic solution for Palestine is the rule of Islam in the usurped land, which is to fight the usurper, and to mobilize the armies of Muslims to uproot the Jews from the blessed land. The permanent and radical solution is to establish the Rightly Guided Caliphate and protect the blessed land of Isra and Mi'raj with the shield of the Caliphate. God willing, those days are not far away.

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims will kill them, until the Jew hides behind the stone and the tree, and the stone or the tree says: O Muslim, O servant of God, there is a Jew behind me, so come and kill him." (Narrated by Muslim)

Written for the Central Media Office radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Muhammad Amin Yildirim

View Original

August 14, 2025

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

The News:

Most of the political and security news in Lebanon revolves around the issue of weapons targeting the Jewish entity, without any other weapons, and focusing on it by most political analysts and journalists.

Comment:

America is asking for the weapons that fought the Jews to be handed over to the Lebanese army, and it does not care about any weapons that remain in the hands of all the people, which can be used internally when it finds an interest in doing so, or between Muslims in neighboring countries.

America, the greatest enemy of us Muslims, said it frankly, even rudely, when its envoy Barack stated from Lebanon that the weapon that must be handed over to the Lebanese state is the weapon that can be used against the Jewish entity occupying blessed Palestine, and not any other individual or medium weapon because this does not harm the Jewish entity, but rather serves it and serves America and the entire West in inciting it to fight between Muslims under the pretext of takfiris, extremists, reactionaries, or backward people, or other descriptions that they fuel among Muslims under the pretext of sectarianism, nationalism, or ethnicity, or even between Muslims and others who have lived with us for hundreds of years and found nothing from us but the preservation of honor, money, and life, and that we were applying the laws to them as we apply them to ourselves, they have what we have and they are obligated to do what we are obligated to do. For the Sharia ruling is the basis of governance for Muslims, whether among themselves, or between them and other subjects of the state.

As long as our greatest enemy, America, wants to destroy or neutralize the weapon that harms the Jewish entity, then why focus on that among politicians and media professionals?!

Why are the most important topics raised in the media and in the Council of Ministers, at the request of the American enemy, without examining them in depth and clarifying the extent of their danger to the nation, the most dangerous of which is the demarcation of the land borders with the Jewish entity, that is, the official recognition of this occupying entity, in a way that no one after that has the right to carry weapons, any weapons, for the sake of Palestine, which is the property of all Muslims and not only the people of Palestine, as they try to convince us as if it belongs only to the people of Palestine?!

The danger lies in presenting this matter sometimes under the title of peace, sometimes under the title of reconciliation, and at other times under the title of security in the region, or under the title of economic, tourism and political prosperity, and the prosperity that they promise Muslims in the event of recognition of this monstrous entity!

America knows very well that Muslims can never be satisfied with recognizing the Jewish entity, and that is why you see it creeping into them through other things to distract them from the most important fateful matter. Yes, America wants us to focus on the issue of weapons, but it knows that weapons, no matter how powerful, will not work and cannot be used against the Jewish entity if official Lebanon recognizes it by demarcating the borders with it, and thus recognizes it and its right to the land of blessed Palestine, under the pretext of the Muslim rulers and the Palestinian Authority.

This recognition of the Jewish entity is a betrayal of God, His Messenger, and the believers, and of all the blood of the martyrs that has been shed and continues to be shed for the liberation of Palestine, and despite all that, we still hope for good in our nation, some of whom are fighting in Gaza, Hashim, and in Palestine, and they say to us with their blood: We will never recognize the Jewish entity, even if it costs us all this and more... So, do we accept in Lebanon to recognize the Jewish entity, no matter how difficult the circumstances are?! Do we accept to demarcate the borders with it, that is, to recognize it, even if the weapons are left with us?! It is the question that we must answer before it is too late.

Written for the Central Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Dr. Muhammad Jaber

Head of the Central Communications Committee of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Lebanon

View Original