Al-Raya Newspaper: Rising Does Not Wait for Permission, and Internal Defeat and the Illusion of Weakness Will Not Produce Empowerment
August 12, 2025

Al-Raya Newspaper: Rising Does Not Wait for Permission, and Internal Defeat and the Illusion of Weakness Will Not Produce Empowerment

Al Raya sahafa

2025-08-13

Al-Raya Newspaper: Rising Does Not Wait for Permission

and Internal Defeat and the Illusion of Weakness Will Not Produce Empowerment

In times of great transformations, military hegemony is not the most dangerous thing that shackles nations, but rather the mental and psychological surrender that convinces peoples that they are weak, and makes them feel that change depends on the satisfaction of the enemy or the approval of the supporter, thus numbing energies and paralyzing wills, enabling weakness instead of paving the way for empowerment.

This is precisely what is intended to be established today in the Levant, after the forces of tyranny have been broken and the pillars of the regime have collapsed, and the revolution has advanced to the heart of the capital, only for the dominant discourse to return and say, "We are a poor country, we need foreign support, we are not able to manage ourselves..., we are weak, let's be realistic and accept reality!"

However, what is more dangerous than merely feeling weak is that promoting this feeling and turning it into a systematic policy is planted in the collective consciousness to paralyze the will for change and advancement.

This pattern of discourse that we are witnessing did not arise from a vacuum, but it is intended to become a rule, fueled by internal and external parties that fear the nation's awareness, liberation, and confidence in its ability to change. Whenever the nation approaches the moment of seizing its decision and possesses the tools of advancement, they rush to remind it falsely that it is "unqualified," that "realism" requires concession, and that "the world will not allow it now," as if they will allow it tomorrow or as if they think they are deceiving it!

Here, the "transitional phase" turns into a rigid political doctrine in which the project is disrupted, wealth is frozen, and leadership is shackled by illusions of need and inability, planting the humiliation within itself in the souls of its people.

When the Messenger of God, peace and blessings be upon him, entered Medina, he did not ask permission from Quraish, nor did he wait for the recognition of Rome, but rather he established a state, laid down a constitution, raised men, and addressed nations... because he carried a principled global project emanating from revelation, so he deserved God's victory.

As for today, when will we realize that our problem is not real weakness, but rather an artificial illusion?

And when will we realize that the incubator is the essence of power?

In Syria, the revolutionary incubator that has not been defeated, but is still capable of giving, this incubator that has offered its children and money and supported the revolution in the darkest of circumstances, but after the fall of the defunct regime, it is treated as merely an audience that is to be controlled, not mobilized, brought in when needed and excluded when there is disagreement, and the new administration seeks to eliminate the spirit of revolution and jihad in the souls of the incubator.

When will we realize that the state is built with the incubator, not at its expense, and with the project, not with tactics, and with a sincere, principled leadership, not with calculations of positions and the stage?!

One of the most important things that undermines real advancement is that the role of the people is reduced to silence and waiting, and that the role of the leadership is reduced to coordination and tactics, so the project disappears, and the "temporary procedure" based on the rule "we are weak" advances to become a fixed policy.

Rising does not wait for an international conference, nor is the political decision made in hotel halls, nor is dignity begged from Western capitals. Rising is a courageous self-decision, and taking action is faith and steadfastness, and empowerment is a gift from God to those who are truthful, sincere, and steadfast.

Here, we must pause to distinguish between those who have lost their way under the weight of reality and those who have regressed from principles under the cloak of realism. The former can be corrected through dialogue and frankness, while the latter belongs on the sidewalk of political exclusion, not in a leadership position.

Whoever wants real empowerment should prepare for it with a principled project, a conscious leadership, a mobilized nation, a look towards God, not towards Washington, Ankara, or Riyadh, and self-confidence, not internal defeat and humiliation.

Syria is neither weak nor poor, and it is rich in its material and human resources: oil, gas, agriculture, a rare geographical location, and a generous incubator, yet it is presented as a disaster area, as if the revolution created poverty! While poverty came from decades of systematic looting by the Assad regime, which should be removed by removing its causes, not by polishing them or circumventing them.

Here, the current leadership crisis always resurfaces, which views the popular incubator as a heavy burden, not as a reservoir of strength, and tries to contain people, not open up to them, as if empowerment and working for empowerment are postponed until another international notice that will not come!

The danger lies not only in the defeatist discourse, but in its transformation into intellectual axioms that are taught, repeated, and legitimized in conferences and studies, until criticism becomes a crime for opposing the corrupt reality and the realism that takes satisfaction with the corruption of reality as its basis, and until the principled alternative becomes an unrealistic utopia.

Today, we are in dire need of an explicit discourse that judges reality and acknowledges its difficulties, but does not adapt to it, opens up the nation's horizon but does not imprison it in negotiation rooms, a discourse that ends the mentality of waiting and humiliation, and replaces it with a mentality of action and determination, and raises the ceiling of trust in God, not in the ambassadors of the West.

Empowerment for us Muslims comes from faith in God, not in the United Nations. What we are experiencing today is a rare moment in the life of the nation, and it should not be managed with the mentality of the weak.

Whoever owns the land, liberates minds, and exposes the international project, should not take a step, but rather steps backwards, because by doing so, he is squandering the fruit of jihad and reproducing the defunct regime with new slogans.

The duty is not to wait for international recognition or foreign aid, but to derive our project from our faith and rediscover our wealth and resources. We should not remain at the end of the caravan waiting for a consensus leadership and applauding its dervishism, but rather select a sincere leadership that carries a principled project without compromise.

The revolution, as a firmly established idea in the hearts of the people, is still full of energy, and the incubator is still pulsating with faith. All that is required of those with determination is to roll up their sleeves and lead it with sincerity and steadfastness. The moment is a moment of rising, not a moment of compromise, and the decision must be made here, on the ground, not there in the rooms of compromises at the hands of the High Commissioner, Barak!

By: Professor Mahmoud Al-Bakri

Source: Al-Raya Newspaper

More from News & Commentary

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

Turkey and Arab Regimes Asked Hamas to Lay Down Their Weapons

(Translated)

News:

The high-level United Nations international conference entitled "Finding a Peaceful Solution to the Palestinian Issue and Implementing the Two-State Solution" was held in New York on July 29 and 30, led by France and Saudi Arabia. Following the conference, which aimed to recognize Palestine as a state and end the war in Gaza, a joint declaration was signed. In addition to the European Union and the League of Arab States, Turkey also signed the declaration along with 17 other countries. The declaration, which consisted of 42 articles and an annex, condemned Operation Al-Aqsa Flood carried out by Hamas. The participating countries called on Hamas to lay down its weapons and demanded that it hand over its administration to the Mahmoud Abbas regime. (Agencies, July 31, 2025).

Comment:

Considering the countries running the conference, the presence of America is clearly evident, and despite not having the authority or influence to make decisions, the Saudi regime, its servant, accompanying France is the clearest evidence of this.

In this regard, French President Emmanuel Macron stated on July 24 that France would officially recognize the Palestinian state in September, and would be the first G7 country to do so. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barreau held a press conference at the conference, announcing the goals of the New York Declaration. In fact, in the statement issued after the conference, the massacres of the Jewish entity were condemned without taking any punitive decision against it, and Hamas was asked to disarm and hand over the administration of Gaza to Mahmoud Abbas.

In the new Middle East strategy that America seeks to implement based on the Abraham Accords, the Salman regime represents the spearhead. Normalization with the Jewish entity will begin after the war, with Saudi Arabia; then other countries will follow, and this wave will turn into a strategic alliance extending from North Africa to Pakistan. The Jewish entity will also receive a security guarantee as an important part of this alliance; then America will use this alliance as fuel in its conflict against China and Russia, and to include Europe completely under its wings, and of course, against the possibility of establishing the Caliphate.

The obstacle to this plan currently is the war in Gaza and then the anger of the Ummah, which is increasing and is about to explode. Therefore, the United States preferred that the European Union, the Arab regimes, and Turkey take the initiative in the New York Declaration. Thinking that accepting the decisions contained in the declaration would be easier.

As for the Arab regimes and Turkey, their mission is to please the United States, protect the Jewish entity, and in return for this obedience, protect themselves from the anger of their peoples, and live a humiliating life with the crumbs of cheap power until they are thrown away or afflicted with the torment of the afterlife. Turkey's reservation on the declaration, on the condition that the so-called two-state solution plan is implemented, is only an attempt to cover up the real goal of the declaration and mislead Muslims, and it has no real value.

In conclusion, the path to liberating Gaza and all of Palestine is not through a fictitious state in which Jews live. The Islamic solution for Palestine is the rule of Islam in the usurped land, which is to fight the usurper, and to mobilize the armies of Muslims to uproot the Jews from the blessed land. The permanent and radical solution is to establish the Rightly Guided Caliphate and protect the blessed land of Isra and Mi'raj with the shield of the Caliphate. God willing, those days are not far away.

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Muslims will kill them, until the Jew hides behind the stone and the tree, and the stone or the tree says: O Muslim, O servant of God, there is a Jew behind me, so come and kill him." (Narrated by Muslim)

Written for the Central Media Office radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Muhammad Amin Yildirim

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

What America Wants is Official Recognition of the Jewish Entity, Even if Weapons Remain

The News:

Most of the political and security news in Lebanon revolves around the issue of weapons targeting the Jewish entity, without any other weapons, and focusing on it by most political analysts and journalists.

Comment:

America is asking for the weapons that fought the Jews to be handed over to the Lebanese army, and it does not care about any weapons that remain in the hands of all the people, which can be used internally when it finds an interest in doing so, or between Muslims in neighboring countries.

America, the greatest enemy of us Muslims, said it frankly, even rudely, when its envoy Barack stated from Lebanon that the weapon that must be handed over to the Lebanese state is the weapon that can be used against the Jewish entity occupying blessed Palestine, and not any other individual or medium weapon because this does not harm the Jewish entity, but rather serves it and serves America and the entire West in inciting it to fight between Muslims under the pretext of takfiris, extremists, reactionaries, or backward people, or other descriptions that they fuel among Muslims under the pretext of sectarianism, nationalism, or ethnicity, or even between Muslims and others who have lived with us for hundreds of years and found nothing from us but the preservation of honor, money, and life, and that we were applying the laws to them as we apply them to ourselves, they have what we have and they are obligated to do what we are obligated to do. For the Sharia ruling is the basis of governance for Muslims, whether among themselves, or between them and other subjects of the state.

As long as our greatest enemy, America, wants to destroy or neutralize the weapon that harms the Jewish entity, then why focus on that among politicians and media professionals?!

Why are the most important topics raised in the media and in the Council of Ministers, at the request of the American enemy, without examining them in depth and clarifying the extent of their danger to the nation, the most dangerous of which is the demarcation of the land borders with the Jewish entity, that is, the official recognition of this occupying entity, in a way that no one after that has the right to carry weapons, any weapons, for the sake of Palestine, which is the property of all Muslims and not only the people of Palestine, as they try to convince us as if it belongs only to the people of Palestine?!

The danger lies in presenting this matter sometimes under the title of peace, sometimes under the title of reconciliation, and at other times under the title of security in the region, or under the title of economic, tourism and political prosperity, and the prosperity that they promise Muslims in the event of recognition of this monstrous entity!

America knows very well that Muslims can never be satisfied with recognizing the Jewish entity, and that is why you see it creeping into them through other things to distract them from the most important fateful matter. Yes, America wants us to focus on the issue of weapons, but it knows that weapons, no matter how powerful, will not work and cannot be used against the Jewish entity if official Lebanon recognizes it by demarcating the borders with it, and thus recognizes it and its right to the land of blessed Palestine, under the pretext of the Muslim rulers and the Palestinian Authority.

This recognition of the Jewish entity is a betrayal of God, His Messenger, and the believers, and of all the blood of the martyrs that has been shed and continues to be shed for the liberation of Palestine, and despite all that, we still hope for good in our nation, some of whom are fighting in Gaza, Hashim, and in Palestine, and they say to us with their blood: We will never recognize the Jewish entity, even if it costs us all this and more... So, do we accept in Lebanon to recognize the Jewish entity, no matter how difficult the circumstances are?! Do we accept to demarcate the borders with it, that is, to recognize it, even if the weapons are left with us?! It is the question that we must answer before it is too late.

Written for the Central Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Dr. Muhammad Jaber

Head of the Central Communications Committee of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Lebanon