The Series "The Caliphate and the Imamate in Islamic Thought" - By the writer and thinker Thaer Salama - Abu Malek - Part 40
The Series "The Caliphate and the Imamate in Islamic Thought" - By the writer and thinker Thaer Salama - Abu Malek - Part 40

The intended meaning of the scholars whose agreement is required is those who were present at the time the incident occurred or the issue was raised. No consideration is given to those who will exist in the future; rather, they must follow if they exist. No consideration is given to the dissenting opinion after a sufficient period has passed for consideration, examination, and the spread of news about the incident. Since the texts received from the Prophet ﷺ preceded the consensus, it is inconceivable that there are evidences from the Sunnah that abrogate or contradict the consensus. Furthermore, what invalidates the consensus is not the personal opinion of a Companion or a scholar, such that it is said: we have not received all of their opinions. Rather, it is invalidated by a report (i.e., a Hadith), because the consensus reveals evidence. Therefore, the establishment of consensus is only invalidated by the existence of contradictory evidence or a scholarly opinion based on contradictory evidence. In that case, news must be received about the invalidation of the consensus and the return of the Companions to the evidence, or their adherence to what they transmitted unanimously because they consider it the valid evidence. Accordingly, the absence of transmitted opposition to their consensus with evidence is sufficient to demonstrate the establishment and decisiveness of the consensus.

0:00 0:00
Speed:
August 08, 2025

The Series "The Caliphate and the Imamate in Islamic Thought" - By the writer and thinker Thaer Salama - Abu Malek - Part 40

The Series "The Caliphate and the Imamate in Islamic Thought"

By the writer and thinker Thaer Salama – Abu Malek

Part Forty: By Whom is Consensus (Ijma) Established?

The intended meaning of the scholars whose agreement is required is those who were present at the time the incident occurred or the issue was raised. No consideration is given to those who will exist in the future; rather, they must follow if they exist. No consideration is given to the dissenting opinion after a sufficient period has passed for consideration, examination, and the spread of news about the incident. Since the texts received from the Prophet ﷺ preceded the consensus, it is inconceivable that there are evidences from the Sunnah that abrogate or contradict the consensus1. Furthermore, what invalidates the consensus is not the personal opinion of a Companion or a scholar, such that it is said: we have not received all of their opinions. Rather, it is invalidated by a report (i.e., a Hadith), because the consensus reveals evidence. Therefore, the establishment of consensus is only invalidated by the existence of contradictory evidence2 or a scholarly opinion based on contradictory evidence. In that case, news must be received about the invalidation of the consensus and the return of the Companions to the evidence, or their adherence to what they transmitted unanimously3 because they consider it the valid evidence. Accordingly, the absence of transmitted opposition to their consensus with evidence is sufficient to demonstrate the establishment and decisiveness of the consensus.

Despite this, the consensus on the obligation of appointing a Caliph and the prohibition of the earth being without a Caliph was established during the era of the Companions in various events. Throughout the eras following the era of the Companions, no one considered to be from that field (politics and jurisprudence) deviated from it, and no one whose opinion is considered deviated from it. "No consideration is given to the opinion of one who is proven to be immoral or ignorant or not qualified to give Fatwas, Hadith, and narrations4," especially since this consensus is based on solid evidence from the Quran and Sunnah that testifies to the obligation of what has been agreed upon. No consideration is given to a dissenting opinion because their opinion contradicts the definitive Quran and Sunnah. The consensus on this issue has been transmitted to us by more scholars than can be counted; in fact, no scholar has transmitted a significant statement that violates the establishment of this consensus. Praise be to Allah in the beginning and the end.

Therefore, the consensus of the Companions does not mean the consensus of their opinions or their agreement on a matter. Rather, in one of its aspects, it means their revealing of evidence that they did not transmit to us verbally, i.e., they did not say to us (collectively or individually) that the Prophet ﷺ said such and such. Rather, due to the clarity of the issue on which they agreed, they did not need to transmit it through the transmission of the Hadith indicating it. An example of this is:

If you saw someone talking on a mobile phone today, you would not explain to a third person what that person is doing. Whereas if someone had a mobile phone a hundred years ago and was talking on it, the matter would be so ambiguous to people that it would require explanation. But today, due to its clarity, it does not need explanation, and explaining it is considered an affectation. This is firstly.

Secondly: The meaning is not the consensus of their opinions, because the Sharia is only taken from the Quran and Sunnah. Their consensus is based on the Quran and Sunnah, but the method of transmission is as we mentioned in the first point.

Thirdly: The difference between their consensus and its اعتبارbeing considered valid and the consensus of others which is not considered valid is the شبهة possibility of direct connection with the Messenger ﷺ to convey the ruling from him. Therefore, they had this connection, so their transmission is evidence. Subsequent centuries did not have this connection, so the consensus of subsequent centuries depends on their consensus. If they transmitted the consensus from generation to generation, then that is excellent, just as the Ummah transmitted from generation to generation that men in private life are separate from women, and just as the Ummah transmitted from generation to generation that the number of Rak'ahs in prayer is such and such, and that the Sunnah of Fajr is confirmed.

Fourthly: Those by whom the consensus is established are the Companions who were present when the incident occurred, provided that they are from the people of the field and craft related to the incident. For example, if the consensus is related to establishing a Caliph after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and giving that priority over all other obligations, then those who were present in that situation from among the people of jurisprudence and knowledge agreed, and no objection was transmitted from others, and no objection was made to their action despite its importance and its reaching all the Companions, and the Companions' pledge of allegiance to the Caliph in the mosque after that. So we did not find any objection and we did not find anyone narrating a Hadith that contradicts it. Therefore, it is said that the consensus has been established.

Therefore, the point here is the establishment of consensus by those who attended the event, and then this event is of such importance and fame that its news spread, and nothing was narrated from any of the Companions that contradicts it or establishes a different ruling for it. Therefore, it is said in such rulings that consensus has been reached in them5.

1- The Companions differed at the time of the plague on whether to enter the plague-stricken land or not, so they disputed the concept of destiny in that. Then the opinion of some of them not to enter was supported by a report from the Prophet ﷺ narrated by Abd al-Rahman bin Auf, may Allah be pleased with him. As soon as the report was narrated, the Companions' قول statement agreed to follow the text, so it is inconceivable that they would agree on something contrary to what was reported, and therefore it is inconceivable that a report would come with the opposite of what they agreed upon after their action, then they would not retract what they agreed upon! If this scenario is absent, then the remaining scenario is that the consensus is not violated.

2- From a purely theoretical point of view, if we imagine the opposition of the transmission of a group of Companions to evidence through their consensus, through another evidence that contradicts it brought by one of them, then what happens is only that what they transmitted is not given the characteristic of definiteness, and the conflicting evidence is confronted with the evidence that they revealed unanimously, and weighting occurs.

3- It is impossible to have a consensus on an opinion and its opposite, and therefore it cannot be said: consensus abrogates consensus!

4-  مراتب الإجماع The Levels of Consensus by Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi, p. 4

5- The Companions did not disagree in the Saqifa on the obligation of appointing a Caliph, even if they initially disagreed on who it should be. They rejected the opinion of the advisor with the two Emirs and did not act on it. They disagreed on who the Caliph should be, whether he should be from the Quraysh or from Medina, whether it should be Abu Bakr, Umar, Abu Ubaidah, or Sa'd, but they did not disagree on the obligation that the Muslims should have a Caliph. So understand well the basis of the ruling on which consensus and certainty were achieved.

More from Articles

Precious Fruits - The tongue of the wise man is behind his heart

Precious Fruits

The tongue of the wise man is behind his heart

Al-Hasan al-Basri heard a man talking too much, so he said: O son of my brother, hold your tongue, for it has been said: There is nothing more worthy of imprisonment than the tongue.

It was narrated that the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: (And what causes people to be thrown on their faces into the Fire except the harvests of their tongues?) Narrated by al-Darimi mursal, Ibn Abd al-Barr, Ibn Abi Shaybah, and Ibn al-Mubarak.

He used to say: The tongue of the wise man is behind his heart, so if he wants to speak, he thinks, and if the speech is in his favor, he speaks, and if it is against him, he remains silent. And the heart of the ignorant person is behind his tongue, whenever he intends to speak, he speaks.

Etiquettes, asceticism, and sermons of Al-Hasan Al-Basri

By Abi al-Faraj Ibn al-Jawzi

May God bless our master Muhammad and all his family and companions

Peace be upon you and God's mercy and blessings

How did Islam enter Sudan?
August 15, 2025

How did Islam enter Sudan?

How did Islam enter Sudan?

The Sudan known today by its geography did not represent a unified political, cultural, or religious entity before the arrival of Muslims, as it was divided among different races, ethnicities, and beliefs. In the north, where the Nubians lived, Orthodox Christianity was prevalent as a belief, and the Nubian language, in its various dialects, was the language of politics, culture, and communication. In the east, the Beja tribes lived, who are Hamitic tribes (attributed to Ham, son of Noah), with their own language, separate culture, and different beliefs from those in the north. If we head south, we find the Negroid tribes with their distinctive features, their own languages, and pagan beliefs. The same is true in the west. ([1])

This diversity and ethnic and cultural pluralism are among the most prominent features and characteristics of the population structure in pre-Islamic Sudan, resulting from several factors, especially since Sudan enjoys a strategic geographic location in Northeast Africa. It represents a gateway to the Horn of Africa and a link between the Arab world and North Africa, and between sub-Saharan Africa. This location has given it a major role in civilizational and cultural communication and political and economic interactions throughout history. In addition, it has vital sea outlets on the Red Sea, one of the most important trade routes in the world.

The first migration of the Companions, may God be pleased with them, to the land of Abyssinia (in Rajab of the fifth year of prophethood, which is the second year of proclaiming the Da'wah) can be seen as the first indication of early contact between nascent Islam and the communities of eastern Sudan. Although the purpose of the migration was originally to seek a safe haven from persecution in Mecca, this step represented the beginning of the first Islamic presence in the African and Sudanese space. In the year 6 AH, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, sent with his messenger Amr bin Umayya a letter to Al-Najashi inviting him to Islam ([2]), and Al-Najashi replied with a letter in which he showed his acceptance.

With the conquest of Egypt at the hands of Amr ibn al-Aas during the reign of the Rashidun Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab in 20 AH/641 AD, the Nubians felt the danger when the Islamic state began to establish its administrative and political influence over the northern Nile Valley, especially in Upper Egypt, which represented a strategic and geographical extension of the Sudanese Nubian kingdoms. Therefore, the Nubian kingdoms began launching preemptive attacks on Upper Egypt as a defensive reaction. Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, ordered the governor of Egypt, Amr ibn al-Aas, to send detachments towards the land of Nubia in Sudan to secure the southern borders of Egypt and to convey the Islamic call. In turn, Amr ibn al-Aas sent an army led by Uqba ibn Nafi al-Fihri in the year 21 AH, but the army was forced to retreat, as the people of Nubia met it with great courage, and many Muslims returned with gouged eyes. The Nubians were skilled archers, making accurate hits even in the eyes, which is why the Muslims called them "archers of the pupils." In the year 26 AH (647 AD), Abdullah ibn Abi al-Sarh was appointed governor of Egypt during the days of Uthman ibn Affan and prepared to meet the Nubians, leading a well-equipped campaign and was able to penetrate south to Dongola*, the capital of the Christian Nubian kingdom in the year 31 AH/652 AD, and besieged the city severely. When they asked him for reconciliation and truce, Abdullah ibn Abi al-Sarh agreed to that ([3]). He concluded a peace treaty with them called the Covenant or Agreement of Baqt** and built a mosque in Dongola. Researchers have strived to understand the meaning of Baqt, some saying it is Latin, (Pactum) meaning agreement, but historians and writers do not see this peace treaty as other peace treaties in which Muslims imposed jizya on those who reconciled with them, but rather considered it an agreement or truce between Muslims and Nubians.

Abdullah ibn Abi al-Sarh pledged to them security, that the Muslims would not fight them, and that the Nubians would enter the lands of the Muslims as passers-by, not residents, and the Nubians would protect whoever entered their land from the Muslims or those under covenant until they left it ([4]). They were also required to maintain the mosque that the Muslims built in Dongola, sweep it, light it, and honor it, and not prevent anyone from praying in it, and to pay 360 heads of their average slaves each year. In return, the Muslims would donate annual supplies of grains and clothing (because the Nubian king complained of a lack of food in his country), but they were not obligated to repel an enemy or raider of their country. With this peace, the Muslims were reassured about the safety of their borders from the south, ensured cross-border trade between the two countries, and obtained the strong arms of Nubia to serve the state. With the movement of goods, ideas also moved, and preachers and merchants played a pivotal role in spreading Islam in Nubia through peaceful means, especially through good dealings. Trade caravans carried with them belief, language, civilization, and a way of life, just as they carried trade goods.

Arabic also became increasingly present in the daily life of Sudanese societies, especially in northern Sudan. This agreement represented a kind of permanent contact between the Muslims and the Christian Nubians that lasted for six centuries ([5]). During that time, the Islamic faith infiltrated the northern part of eastern Sudan from the mid-seventh century AD at the hands of Muslim merchants and Arab immigrants. These major Arab migrations infiltrated through 3 routes: first: from Egypt, second from the Hijaz via the ports of Badi, Aydhab and Suakin, and third: from Morocco and North Africa through the central Sudan. However, the impact of these groups was not effective due to their small size compared to the large numbers that moved from Egypt to the south since the ninth century AD, after which the land of Beja, Nubia and Central Sudan was melted by the Arab element. At that time, the Abbasid Caliph Al-Mu'tasim (218-227 AH/833-842 AD) decided to rely on Turkish soldiers and abandon Arab soldiers, which is considered a dangerous turning point in the history of Arabs in Egypt. Thus, the third century AH/ninth century AD witnessed wide Arab migrations to Sudan, and then penetration into the vast plains south and east ([6]), which helped stability in these areas to connect with the people of the country, influence them, and accept Islam and enter into it.

In the twelfth century AD, following the Crusaders' occupation of Palestine, the Sinai route for Egyptian and Moroccan pilgrims was no longer safe, so they turned to the port of Aydhab (known as the Port of Gold, located on the Red Sea coast). When the pilgrimage movement became active there and Muslims frequented it on their way to and from the holy lands in the Hijaz, the ships carrying goods from Yemen and India began to anchor there, thus its area was populated and its movement increased, and Aydhab occupied an excellent position in the religious and commercial life of Muslims. ([7])

When the kings of Nubia broke the covenant whenever they found weakness or weakness from the Muslims and raided Aswan and the positions of Muslims in Egypt, especially during the days of its king David in 1272 AD, the Muslims were forced to fight them during the days of al-Zahir Baybars, and a new treaty was concluded between the two parties in 1276 AD, and finally Sultan al-Nasir bin Qalawun opened Dongola in 1317 AD, and the king of Nubia, Abdullah, son of King David's brother, converted to Islam in 1316 AD, which facilitated its spread there, and the land of Nubia entered Islam permanently.([8])

As for the Christian kingdom of Alwa, it was overthrown following the alliance between the Arab Abdallab tribes and the Zanj Funj in 1504 AD, and the Islamic Funj kingdom was established, also known as the "Sennar Sultanate" after the capital, and also as the "Blue Kingdom." The Sennar kingdom is considered the first Arab Islamic state established in Sudan after the spread of Islam and the Arabic language there([9]).

As a result of the increasing Arab Islamic influence, the royal families in Nubia, Alwa, Sennar, Taqali and Darfur became Muslim after they were Christian or pagan. The ruling class's conversion to Islam was enough to bring about a multi-dimensional revolution in the history of Sudan. Muslim ruling families were formed, and with them the first models of Sudanese Islamic kingdoms were established, which had a great impact on empowering this religion and effectively contributed to spreading the Islamic religion, consolidating its pillars, laying its foundations, and establishing the foundations of Islamic civilization in the land of Sudan. Some kings assumed the role of preachers in their countries and understood their role as guardians who were responsible for conveying and preserving this religion, so they ordered what is right, forbade what is wrong, judged according to God's law, established justice as much as they could, and called to God and strived in His cause. ([10])

Thus, the call of Islam proceeded strongly and effectively in this region amidst hurricanes of paganism and Christian evangelism campaigns. Thus, Sudan is considered one of the most famous regions in which the peaceful Da'wah represented the true model for the spread of Islam, and the ability of Muslims to spread their faith through persuasion, argument, and good treatment emerged. Caravan trade and jurists played a major role in spreading Islam in the Sudanese lands, where markets replaced battlefields, and honesty, truthfulness, and good treatment replaced the sword in spreading the doctrine of monotheism([11]). In this regard, the jurist historian Abu al-Abbas Ahmad Baba al-Tanbukti says: "The people of Sudan embraced Islam voluntarily without anyone taking control of them, like the people of Kano and Borno. We have not heard that anyone took control of them before their Islam."

#SudanCrisis         #SudanCrisis

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

M. Durra Al-Bakoush

** Appendix: Covenant from Prince Abdullah bin Saad bin Abi Sarh to the Great of Nubia and to all the people of his kingdom:

"A covenant he made to the great and small of Nubia, from the border of the land of Aswan to the border of the land of Alwa, that Abdullah bin Saad has given them security and a truce running between them and the Muslims who border them from the people of Upper Egypt and other Muslims and the people of the Dhimma, that you, the Nubian community, are safe with the security of God and the security of His Messenger Muhammad the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, that we will not fight you, nor wage war against you, nor invade you, as long as you abide by the conditions between us and you, that you enter our country as passers-by, not residents in it, and we enter your country as passers-by, not residents in it, and you must protect whoever enters your country, or visits it, from Muslims or those under covenant, until he leaves you, and you must return every runaway who comes to you from the slaves of the Muslims, until you return him to the land of Islam, and do not seize him, nor prevent him from it, nor interfere with a Muslim who intends to reach him and argue with him until he leaves him, and you must protect the mosque that the Muslims built in the courtyard of your city, and do not prevent a worshiper from it, and you must sweep it, light it, and honor it, and you must pay three hundred and sixty heads every year, which you pay to the Imam of the Muslims from the average slaves of your country who are not defective, including males and females, in which there is no decrepit old man, nor an old woman, nor a child who has not reached puberty, you pay that to the governor of Aswan, and no Muslim has to repel an enemy that comes to you, nor prevent him from you, from the border of the land of Alwa to the land of Aswan, if you harbor a Muslim slave or kill a Muslim or someone under covenant, or interfere with the mosque that the Muslims built in the courtyard of your city by demolishing it, or prevent anything from the three hundred and sixty heads, then this truce and security are void, and we and you are back to square one until God judges between us, and He is the best of judges, with that is God's covenant and His pledge and His guarantee and the guarantee of His Messenger Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, and we have upon you for that the greatest thing you adhere to of the guarantee of Christ, and the guarantee of the apostles, and the guarantee of whoever you magnify from the people of your religion and your sect.

God is the witness between us and you on that. Written by Amr bin Shurahbil in Ramadan, year thirty-one."


[1] The Entry of Islam into Sudan and its Impact on Correcting Beliefs by Dr. Salah Ibrahim Issa

[2] Chapter Ten of the book Tanwir Al-Ghabash fi Fadl Ahl Al-Sudan wal-Habash, by Ibn al-Jawzi

* Before Islam, the land of Nubia was divided into 3 kingdoms: Nubia, Makuria, and Alwa (from Aswan in the south to Khartoum currently). Then, after that, the kingdoms of Nubia and Makuria united between 570 AD and 652 AD and were called the Kingdom of Nubia, and its capital was Dongola.

[3] Futuh al-Buldan by Imam Ahmad ibn Yahya ibn Jabir al-Baghdadi (known as al-Baladhuri)

** See the appendix to read the full text of the covenant

[4] Islam and Nubia in the Middle Ages by Dr. Mustafa Muhammad Saad

[5] Islam in the Sudan by J. Spencer Trimingham

[6] The Spread of Islam in Sub-Saharan Africa by Yusuf Fadl Hassan

[7] Sudan Through the Ages by Dr. Makki Shibeika

[8] Sudan by Mahmoud Shaker

[9] A Reading in the History of the Islamic Funj Kingdom (910 - 1237 AH/ 1504 - 1821 AD) by Dr. Tayeb Boujamaa Naima

[10] Islam and Nubia in the Middle Ages by Dr. Mustafa Muhammad Saad

[11] Studies in the History of Islam and Ruling Families in Sub-Saharan Africa by Dr. Nour El-Din Al-Shaabani