The series "The Caliphate and the Imamate in Islamic Thought"
By the writer and thinker Thaer Salama - Abu Malek
Part Forty-Four: Methods of Conceptual Consensus – Part 1
When we say: conceptual consensus (tawatur ma'nawi), we derive it from a transmission process that has reached consensus, which comes through induction,
and induction, as Al-Shatibi said about it: "This is its nature; it is examining the parts of that meaning to establish from it a general rule, either definitive or probable, and this is a matter agreed upon by the people of rational and transmitted sciences."1
The transmission that is useful for conceptual consensus is of three types:
The first: either through the transmission of a group of singular reports (hadith narrations)
The second: or through a collective practical transmission that conveys a specific meaning,
The third: or by extrapolating the combined participation of evidence in conveying one meaning,
As for the first type: news, so that a common meaning is mentioned in it by induction derived from the forms and meanings of those forms, that is, the "common meaning" is repeatedly conveyed through implication in different words, so that the gathering of those reports on a common meaning fills the gap of uncertainty that is in the singular reports, so conceptual consensus is taken, with four conditions:
The first condition: That a group of narrators of singular reports reach an amount that makes their agreement on lying impossible2, that is, if you study the total of the reports as you study a single consensus (mutawatir) hadith, you will find the number in the total of them makes the agreement of the narrators of all the reports on lying impossible, and the existence of consensus (tawatur) in all the classes that narrated the hadiths in the same way that we verified the reaching of a group of narrators to an amount that makes their agreement on lying impossible,
The second condition: that a meaning is repeatedly conveyed within different words, even if the common meaning in it is by way of implication, but each of them includes a common meaning obtained by induction between them that indicates the meaning by way of inclusion or commitment.
Muhammad al-Najjar al-Futuhi said in Sharh al-Kawkab al-Munir: As for the conceptual consensus from the Sunnah, it is that a meaning is repeatedly conveyed within different words, even if the common meaning in it is by way of implication, it is abundant (and) a conceptual section (which is the difference of words with sharing in a general meaning) even if by way of implication, as mentioned previously. And that is (like the hadith of the Cistern, and the generosity of Hatem) and the bravery of Ali, may God be pleased with him, and others. And that is when the news in the events is abundant and differed in, but each of them includes a common meaning between them by way of inclusion or commitment, knowledge of the common amount is obtained, which is, for example, bravery or generosity and the like, and it is called the consensus from the direction of meaning, and that is like the events of Hatem in what is told of his gifts of a horse, camel, eye, garment, and the like. For it includes his generosity and it is known, even if nothing of those cases is known specifically, and like the cases of Ali, may God be pleased with him, in his wars that he defeated in Khaybar such and such and did in Uhud such and such, to the like of that. For it indicates by implication his bravery.3
The third condition: that the meaning is general, not specific, absolute without restriction, and that the meaning is useful, that is, it comes to one thing, not a group of separate things that do not indicate that meaning by indication of inclusion or commitment, Al-Shatibi said: "And the second: that this is the meaning of conceptual consensus, for Hatem's generosity, for example, was established absolutely without restriction, and generally without specification, by the transmission of special multiple events that exceed enumeration, different in occurrence, agreeing in the meaning of generosity, until it obtained for the listener a universal meaning by which he ruled on Hatem, which is generosity, and the specificity of the events did not detract from this benefit,4
The fourth condition: that the meaning derived from the consensus does not contradict a definitive evidence, whether it contradicts the evidence completely, or we derived from the definitive evidence meanings that contradict or detract from what is derived from the conceptual consensus and raised signs of doubt around it, lowering it from the degree of certainty. (The meaning must agree with what is derived from the definitive evidence, for example, the singular reports from which we derived the statement about the torment of the grave fell from the degree of conceptual consensus slightly because of their contradiction with what some verses may lead to meanings with which we need interpretation and reasoning, which makes it difficult to understand them as they are in a way that leads to certainty, such as the saying of God Almighty: ﴿AND THE DAY THE HOUR COMES THE CRIMINALS WILL SWEAR THAT THEY DID NOT STAY EXCEPT AN HOUR. THUS WERE THEY EVER DELUDED. AND THOSE WHO WERE GIVEN KNOWLEDGE AND FAITH WILL SAY, "YOU HAVE ALREADY REMAINED IN THE DECREE OF ALLAH UNTIL THE DAY OF RESURRECTION, AND THIS IS THE DAY OF RESURRECTION, BUT YOU DID NOT USED TO KNOW."﴾ [Al-Rum: 55 – 56]5, and this is a type that falls under what Al-Shatibi called: "and the specificity of the events did not detract from this benefit"
Important note: In the verbal consensus as well as in the conceptual consensus, we see that reaching a number that makes their agreement on lying impossible needs to be added to it conditions until it is useful for certainty, whether in the verbal consensus or in the conceptual consensus, as in the conceptual it needs to the lack of opposition mentioned in the fourth above, because they did not gather to narrate one hadith until it is said: it is useful for certainty with their number, but with different narrations each narration has its own motives for uncertainty, and also in the verbal consensus, the condition of reaching a number that makes their agreement on lying impossible is not enough to be useful for certainty, but other conditions must be added to it, including that they are aware of what they reported, and that they know that from a necessity of witnessing or hearing, so pay attention to this, may God have mercy on you!
Al-Shatibi said in Al-Muwafaqat: And the second: that this is the meaning of conceptual consensus, for Hatem's generosity, for example, was established absolutely without restriction, and generally without specification, by the transmission of special multiple events that exceed enumeration, different in occurrence, agreeing in the meaning of generosity, until it obtained for the listener a universal meaning by which he ruled on Hatem, which is generosity, and the specificity of the events did not detract from this benefit,.6
1- Al-Muwafaqat by Al-Shatibi, Book of Legal Evidence
2- For example: the narrations of the torment of the grave reached in the era of the Companions about seventy hadiths with their different narrations, narrated by about twenty-six Companions
3- Muhammad al-Najjar al-Futuhi in Sharh al-Kawkab al-Munir, chapter on consensus
4- Al-Muwafaqat by Al-Shatibi, Book of Legal Evidence
5- See our book: Evidence of Belief, there is a complete chapter on these verses and this issue
6- Al-Muwafaqat by Al-Shatibi, Book of Legal Evidence