The Anti-Islam Democracy is in Crisis, Yet Muslims are Asked to Save it with Their Votes!
The Anti-Islam Democracy is in Crisis, Yet Muslims are Asked to Save it with Their Votes!

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
November 11, 2025

The Anti-Islam Democracy is in Crisis, Yet Muslims are Asked to Save it with Their Votes!

The Anti-Islam Democracy is in Crisis, Yet Muslims are Asked to Save it with Their Votes!

(Translated)

News:

In Denmark, as in many other Western countries, public and political discourse is increasingly influenced by openly anti-Islam currents. Discussions of re-migration - the deportation of non-Western residents - have moved from fringe movements to mainstream political debate. At the same time, the rhetoric on integration has intensified, with Muslims increasingly portrayed as a group that must either fully integrate or leave.

Despite this hostile climate, politicians, civil society, and even some Islamic figures are urging Muslims to "take responsibility" by participating in the democratic process, especially in the upcoming local and national elections. This call comes even as the political environment becomes increasingly repressive and openly hostile to Islam. In a deliberate gesture of initial support, Morten Messerschmidt, the leader of the far-right Danish People's Party, known for his virulent hate speech against Islam and Muslims, was awarded the Order of the Dannebrog, a gesture many saw as governmental endorsement of racism and populism. Meanwhile, the broader political scene is witnessing an intellectual decline. Traditional parties are losing public confidence, and both the right and the left are engaging in a race to the bottom, competing to appear the toughest on immigration and Islam. The upcoming parliamentary elections are expected to be even more dangerous, with Islam and Muslims once again being seen as a convenient scapegoat for a system suffering from a deep crisis.

Comment:

Western democracy is collapsing politically, morally, and intellectually. This system, which has pretended for decades to be the protector of freedom and justice, is now revealing its reality as a dilapidated intellectual project, resorting, in the absence of real solutions or vision, to targeting Muslims to maintain a facade of control and legitimacy.

We are now witnessing the same symptoms that historically preceded revolutions or major social upheavals: a deep lack of confidence in political institutions, a loss of principled coherence, and a political discourse that is becoming increasingly aggressive and irrational. When ideas die, identity politics arise, and when principle fails, nationalism and fabricated enemies take their place. Today, as in the past, that enemy is Islam.

It is precisely in this environment that Muslims are now being called upon to engage more than ever in the democratic system. But how can it be reasonable that at a time when Islam and Muslims are being openly attacked, and even discussed as candidates for deportation, Muslims are at the same time being asked to empower the very system that orchestrates this hostility?!

This contradiction is based on a dangerous illusion: the idea that democracy is a neutral tool that Muslims can use to their advantage. In reality, democracy is not neutral; it is a system based on secularism, where sovereignty belongs to the people, not to God. Under this system, Islam is not only excluded from the public sphere, but is treated as a threat. Supporting this system politically is not only ineffective, but is a rejection of the solution that God has set for us, ﴿Do they then seek the judgement of [the time of] ignorance? But who is better than Allah in judgement for a people who are certain [in faith].﴾.

Instead of directing our energies, resources, and hopes to support a failed and hostile system, Muslims in the West must turn to the task commanded by Allah Almighty, which is to establish the Khilafah according to the method of the Prophet ﷺ. This is not just a divine duty, but it is the only realistic and effective way to truly advance Muslims around the world and protect their dignity locally. A state that carries Islam as its principle will immediately change the global discourse, and gain respect through political will, intellectual strength, and economic power. Islam will not rise with ballot boxes, but by adopting a comprehensive system for life, society, and the state. And Muslims will not be protected by integrating into a dying system, but by restoring the authority of Islam, to lead humanity once again with justice, truth, and light.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Ibrahim Al-Atrash

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari