Al-Fashir: The Battle That Could Change Sudan's Map
Al-Fashir: The Battle That Could Change Sudan's Map

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
November 02, 2025

Al-Fashir: The Battle That Could Change Sudan's Map

Al-Fashir: The Battle That Could Change Sudan's Map

News:

In the coming days, it will become clear whether Al-Fashir will turn into a new headquarters for a de facto authority in the west, or whether it will remain an open arena for a long conflict that drains everyone. But what is certain is that October 26, 2025, will be recorded as a pivotal day in the Sudanese war. (Arabs48, 10/31/2025)

Comment:

After more than a year of sieges and skirmishes, the Rapid Support Forces launched a large-scale attack on the city of Al-Fashir, targeting the headquarters of the 6th Infantry Division of the Sudanese army, which throughout the war has remained a symbol of the army's steadfastness in the Darfur region and a major stronghold of its military leaders. Throughout the year, things changed according to the arrangements of the parties to the conflict and according to the instructions issued to them from Washington.

Initially, the army cleared the central region (Khartoum, Omdurman, and Bahri) of the Rapid Support Forces, which quickly evacuated the central region, and it appeared that it must have evacuated the region by agreement because the army opened safe, undeclared corridors for it towards Darfur. Then, it actually imposed a siege on the city of Al-Fashir, the largest and most famous city in the five Darfur states, and its occupation by the Rapid Support Forces meant its almost complete control over the five regions, four of whose capitals were controlled by the army.

Indeed, the army refrained from supporting the 6th Infantry Division in Al-Fashir, despite its ability to do so, and the Rapid Support Forces announced the formation of a separatist government that began carrying out its work from the city of Nyala. The conflict in Sudan between America's two agents; Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Hamdan Daglo (Hemedti) is heading towards division and fragmentation of the country, i.e., seeking to separate Darfur from it, and this cannot happen except with direct instructions from America.

Indeed, about two months ago, and in compliance with what is rumored about President Trump's desire to end wars and portray himself as a man of peace, America began talking about a ceasefire in Sudan, and on 2025/9/2, it brought together the Quartet (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Emirates), and issued a statement signed by the Quartet requesting a three-month truce followed by peace negotiations between the two parties.

Then America brought together the two parties to the conflict in Washington, despite the denial of al-Burhan's representatives during his foreign minister's visit to Washington, and an agreement was reached on a ceasefire. Because the Rapid Support Forces had not yet taken control of the city of Al-Fashir, the capital of Darfur, al-Burhan's leadership issued orders to the 6th Division to evacuate the sites in the city and withdraw so that those forces could take the city, and then move the center of its separatist government to it according to Washington's instructions, and this was done only two days after the Washington meeting!

America did not show any serious opposition to the occupation of Al-Fashir, and continued to demand a three-month truce and negotiations between the two parties, meaning that it agrees to the occupation of Al-Fashir.

Now, what prevents the Rapid Support Forces from becoming independent with Darfur from Sudan after al-Burhan's leadership helped in preparing the arena for that during the war? Does he realize that the war that America's two agents ignited between themselves since the beginning of 2023, which claimed the lives of tens of thousands and millions of displaced people, had no purpose other than to expel the Europeans' agents from Sudan as an American sphere of influence, then fragment Sudan and split Darfur from it after splitting its south from it previously? Is there anyone who will take heed?!

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Bilal Al-Tamimi

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari