India and Trump's Threats
India and Trump's Threats

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 17, 2025

India and Trump's Threats

India and Trump's Threats

News:

An American official and a European Union diplomat stated that US President Donald Trump urged the bloc's officials last Tuesday to impose tariffs on China up to 100% as part of a strategy to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The official, who requested anonymity to discuss these private conversations, said that Trump also encouraged the European Union to impose broad tariffs on India. (Al-Arabiya)

Comment:

First: Western newspapers confirmed that US President Donald Trump insulted and angered India, which prompted it to reconsider its relationship with his country and search for its own path and partners that it may find in China and Russia. The New York Times newspaper saw that Trump wasted what his predecessors had invested in building relations with India, and Bloomberg said: India has begun to strengthen its relations with China and Russia, defying Washington. The New York Times said: Successive American presidents have invested over three decades a huge diplomatic capital to build a friendship with India, Bill Clinton described the two democracies as "natural allies," George W. Bush described them as "brothers in the cause of human freedom," and Barack Obama and Joe Biden said: "The relationship between them is one of the most important global agreements of this century."

Second: India, despite its size and population, was and still is a client state. Initially, it was under British labor and Britain exploited it greatly in consolidating its influence in the world, so it fought with Indians. Britain colonized India for more than two centuries and remained within the British influence and labor even after the alleged independence, and Britain's feet were more firmly rooted in India and created clients and an ancient party in India, the Congress Party, which led India after the so-called independence, and India remained the jewel in the British crown.

When Britain weakened, the United States began to remove it from its colonies, including India, but it initially failed due to the strong ties with the British and the strength of British agents, so it resorted to exploiting the Buddhist faith and encouraging religious parties to reach power, so it supported Vajpayee (Prime Minister of India three times) of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which revived relations between New Delhi and Washington in an unprecedented way, but all of that changed when the Bharatiya Janata Party lost the general elections in 2004 and the Congress Party - loyal to Britain - took over the government. In 2010, the Indian Parliament issued the "Nuclear Liability" law, which placed excessive restrictions on suppliers of nuclear power plants; in order to deter the United States and its companies from entering the Indian market, and the implementation of the law made concluding the civil nuclear agreement with America in 2005 impossible.

After the fall of the Congress Party government and the success of the Modi party, he had to start improving America's image among the Indian people, and America's expectations were modest for any change at that time, given the heavy legacy that Modi inherited after the Congress Party.

America's support for Modi during the elections was remarkable, "Modi's polishing campaign was not only in India, but also extended to large formations of sympathetic Hindu organizations residing outside the country, especially in America, as it sought to promote him as a leader for all Hindus and wanting to work alongside small ethnicities without exception. Among the organizations that stood by him are the Indian American Foundation and the Indian American Political Action Committee. These organizations did not miss coordinating and cooperating with arms directly or indirectly affiliated with Bharatiya Janata, such as the Foreign Affairs Cell and Friends of Bharatiya Janata abroad, not to mention thousands of Indians residing in America and elsewhere. It would take too long to tell how the American administrations made tremendous efforts to remove the ancient Congress Party and bring America's agents to power with its support.

Former US Ambassador to India Robert Blackwill said, while giving a speech on US-India relations in the Modi era in New Delhi in January 2015: "Regarding the United States' strategy towards India over the next two years, in my opinion our expectations should be modest at best, unlike what they were at the beginning of the last decade, neither this prime minister nor this president will be able to make a strategic shift in relations between the United States and India, so in my opinion there will be no real strategic partnership between the two countries in the next two years."

The intent of the above is how America made maximum efforts to ensure the presence of its agents in power, but even went so far as to overthrow the government of Nawaz Sharif with a coup by Pervez Musharraf when he could not control the fighters and led to the loss of Vajpayee's government and the arrival of the Congress Party, and imposed humiliating concessions on Pakistan for India and cooperated with it in all military, nuclear, technological and commercial fields and brought it into its strategy to contain China, as the biggest obstacle to making India face China was the presence of the Congress Party in power, this obstacle has disappeared, and it has become easy for America to convince the Janata Party loyal to it to focus the Indian army on the borders of China instead of the borders with Pakistan, and it gave India a role in Afghanistan that it never dreamed of.

Third: Today, Trump comes to impose on India an increase in customs duties on goods coming from India to up to 50%. Here we pause a little, it is true that America's agents in India are humiliated and will not refuse a request from it, and it is true that America does not care about others or their interests, but does the Trump administration not fear the fall of its agents in power and the impact of this on them, as well as fear for its strategy to contain China?!

Written for the Radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Hassan Hamdan

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari