Germany Shows Greater Hostility Towards Muslims and currently Refuses to Impose European Sanctions on the Jewish Entity
Germany Shows Greater Hostility Towards Muslims and currently Refuses to Impose European Sanctions on the Jewish Entity

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul announced, during a European Union meeting in the Danish capital Copenhagen on Saturday, that Berlin would not currently approve the European Commission's proposal to impose sanctions on the Jewish entity against the backdrop of the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. (Arab 48, 8/30/2025)

0:00 0:00
Speed:
August 31, 2025

Germany Shows Greater Hostility Towards Muslims and currently Refuses to Impose European Sanctions on the Jewish Entity

Germany Shows Greater Hostility Towards Muslims

and currently Refuses to Impose European Sanctions on the Jewish Entity

News:

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul announced, during a European Union meeting in the Danish capital Copenhagen on Saturday, that Berlin would not currently approve the European Commission's proposal to impose sanctions on the Jewish entity against the backdrop of the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. (Arab 48, 8/30/2025)

Comment:

Muslims today should monitor the positions of all countries towards them, and if foreign countries criticize the Jewish entity, certain countries support its massacres with all their might. While it is natural to expect this from countries in the West, Western countries differ in their positions. The humanitarian situation in Gaza should have turned the tables and changed the thinking of many, but the Western countries most hostile to Muslims have not changed their positions.

In addition to America, Britain, and France, which are major heads of infidel states hostile to Islam, the emergence of Germany in particular as one of the Western countries most hostile to Muslims was not viewed to this degree. Despite the change of governments in Germany during the period of the Jewish massacres in Gaza, Germany remained steadfast in its support for the Jewish entity and its opposition to Muslims in Gaza and elsewhere.

Although the European Union's measure, which did not see the light of day, is all nonsense and talks about a mild boycott of the Jewish entity, Germany rejected even that measure. Throughout the war, it supplied the Jewish entity with weapons and equipment and defended it in international criminal forums. It prevented activists in Germany from demonstrating and declaring their rejection of the Jewish massacres in Gaza, and it arrested these activists and restricted them in a way that distinguished it from the rest of the European countries.

This deep level of German hostility towards Muslims and overwhelming support for Jews is being carried out because the rulers of the Muslims stand with the West against their own people. None of them threaten Germany's interests, neither in its trade, nor in its industry, nor in its supply of Muslim gas and oil. All of this makes German politicians feel safe in their hostility to Islam, and throughout history they have been characterized by political recklessness. They do not appreciate the situation properly and quickly follow waves of hostility, adopting policies that have often been disastrous for Germany.

Today, the Germans claim that they are atoning for their Nazi history and the Jewish massacres in Europe, and therefore they are supporting them to carry out massacres against Muslims everywhere, and Gaza is not far from any blind person in Germany. Germany, in its short-sightedness, thinks that the reality of the Islamic countries in terms of surrender to the West will remain in this way, and does not realize that change is coming and is near.

Germany has ascended to a difficult level with the depth of its hostility towards Muslims and the intensity of this hostility, just like America, Britain, and France. It has forgotten, if it is taking a lesson from its history, that these countries killed millions of Germans, and Muslims did not kill any Germans, but it puts itself at the tail of these countries and leads the hostility to Islam without regard for the future.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Bilal Al-Tamimi

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari