The Saudi Regime is a Support for Openly Immoral People, Aided by the Flattery of the New Rulers of Syria
News:
The transitional president in Syria, Ahmed Al-Sharaa, spoke about his first foreign visit after coming to power, noting that he chose to go to Saudi Arabia because he "knew where the key was." He said in a dialogue session at the Future Investment Initiative Forum on Wednesday: "When we went on the first trip to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, we knew where the key was." He continued, in the presence of Ibn Salman, who appeared smiling, saying: "Saudi Arabia is a country heading towards prosperity, stability, and extensive development, and this experience has become unique in the region." He added: "And for a long time, I have been following the vision presented by His Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and I saw that it is not only within the borders of the Kingdom, I saw that it is a vision that includes the entire region, and we picked up this message, and when we arrived in Damascus, we rushed to come to be part of this arrangement that is happening." Al-Sharaa's statements sparked widespread interaction in Saudi Arabia with the spread of the hashtag "Saudi Arabia is the key to the world" on the X platform. (CNN, 10/29/2025)
Comment:
Someone might ask: What should the rulers of Syria do after Bashar flees from Syria? Should they take everyone as enemies all at once? Or should they flatter or appease the rulers surrounding the land of Syria, the Jewish state, and international powers like America and its organizations like the United Nations, even if temporarily? Can the rulers of Syria stand firm if they announce their adherence to Islam alone in all their relations? Or should they ride other waves to avoid a clash with the West and its agents, whether the clash is intellectual or material? Does "flattery" increase the chances of empowering Islam and its system internally and externally? Or does it mix truth with falsehood? Has the influence of the West and its agents increased in Syria after Bashar's flight, or has it decreased as a result of enabling all countries to play with the fate of Syria, even through investment? Or is all of that cunning and blinding the West's eyes to the army that is being prepared in Syria?
The answer to all these questions will not be in these brief words, but it will be clear to whoever takes Islam as the basis for his idea and a measure for his actions, so he goes with the Sharia ruling wherever it goes, no matter how different the facts and difficulties are. Yes, it will be clear to those who deduced from the noble Prophetic biography rulings for dealing with all facts, not to those who denied it and said: "Ready-made systems cannot be imported from abroad or experiences from history copied for application."
As for Ibn Salman's Vision 2030, the entire Islamic nation has been keeping pace with its reality since 2016, as it was and still is a real attempt to estrange the nation from Islam and its values and an attempt to secularize the people of Najd and Hejaz and make them accept evil openly, so that good becomes evil and evil becomes good, thanks to the media machine in highlighting immoral immigrants and infidels as successful and as role models for society.
The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: «Indeed, the millstone of Islam is turning, so turn with the Book wherever it turns. Indeed, the Book and the authority will separate, so do not separate from the Book. Indeed, there will be rulers over you who will judge for themselves what they do not judge for you. If you disobey them, they will kill you, and if you obey them, they will lead you astray.» They said: O Messenger of Allah, what should we do? He said: «As the companions of Jesus, the son of Mary, did, they were sawn with saws and carried on wood. Death in obedience to Allah is better than life in disobedience to Allah.» Related by Al-Tabarani
Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir
Nizar Jamal