Madagascar Coup: A French Play or Another Nail in the Coffin of its Influence?
Madagascar Coup: A French Play or Another Nail in the Coffin of its Influence?

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
October 16, 2025

Madagascar Coup: A French Play or Another Nail in the Coffin of its Influence?

Madagascar Coup: A French Play or Another Nail in the Coffin of its Influence?

News:

The leader of the elite unit in the Madagascar army, Colonel Michael Andrianiirina, announced on Tuesday that the army has taken power in this island nation located in Africa, after the National Assembly (Parliament) voted to impeach President Andry Rajoelina on charges of dereliction of duty. (Al Jazeera)

Anti-France signs also spread, according to what the French Press Agency team noticed in the capital of Madagascar, and it read: "Get out, France," and "O Rajoelina and Macron, get out." (Al Jazeera)

Comment:

To begin with, Madagascar is located off the coast of East Africa, and it is the fourth largest island in the world, inhabited by approximately 26 million people or more, and its capital is Antananarivo, or "Tana" as the French colonists called it.

In the late nineteenth century, the colonial race around the island of Madagascar and the surrounding islands was at its fiercest between France and Britain. Through Christian missionaries, traders and smugglers, they tried to extend their influence over this strategic region located in the middle of the Indian Ocean. Then things went to France, which officially declared its colonization of Madagascar on August 6, 1896.

French colonialism is barbaric in every sense of the word. No country occupied by France is free of massacres and extermination of its people, and its history bears witness to it in killing and extermination. For example, in 1947, its forces committed a massacre against the people of Madagascar, in addition to plundering wealth on a large scale, and exploiting the deteriorating economic conditions of the colonized countries, and the poverty of peoples in a way that exceeds imagination, which led to their rejection and hatred, and facilitated the process of their exit or expulsion from their colonies. This was aided by the international conflict and the significant deterioration of its international position and decline, especially after the war on Ukraine and France's political and economic crises. We have witnessed African countries rejecting France and expelling it in humiliation, and Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger are the best evidence. France was forced to board the train of colonial decline as a result of weakness and international conflict.

Regarding the issue of international conflict: America entered the African continent militarily in 2008 through its military force dedicated to Africa (AFRICOM), then began funding operations to train and arm African armies in the French colonies under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Since AFRICOM entered Africa, several coups have taken place in several African countries at the hands of military forces trained specifically by America.

What appears from tracking and reading events and is most likely is that the matter is not a real coup, but rather a pre-emptive move for fear of a real coup. There are indications of this, including:

1- Some media outlets reported that President Rajoelina left the country on a French military plane after agreeing with Macron. The Al-Sharq Al-Awsat newspaper stated: "A military source told Reuters that Rajoelina left the country on a French military plane yesterday, Sunday. French radio said that he had reached an agreement with French President Emmanuel Macron." This means that his departure was a French decision.

2- The existing political establishment is the one that dismissed him, and they are the France group. What indicates this is the parliamentarians' decision to dismiss him by that overwhelming majority.

3- French statements were not as tense about that movement as in Mali, for example, but rather talk of French concern.

In conclusion: It is established and definitive that France has entered the dark tunnel and the path of international decline, and the matter has even extended to the exacerbation of internal political crises, internal division, external crises, and its economic crises, along with Europe, which has shown great incompetence and weakness in the war in Ukraine. Perhaps one day it will taste what it has inflicted on the world, especially since it has a dirty colonial history (and all colonial countries are like that), and it sings about freedom, the French Revolution, and its slogans with lies and deception.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir Central

Hassan Hamdan

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari