Sana'a and Aden governments continue to punish people by cutting their salaries, and Islam requires them to be paid from state revenues, not from public properties
Sana'a and Aden governments continue to punish people by cutting their salaries, and Islam requires them to be paid from state revenues, not from public properties

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
October 31, 2025

Sana'a and Aden governments continue to punish people by cutting their salaries, and Islam requires them to be paid from state revenues, not from public properties

Sana'a and Aden governments continue to punish people by cutting their salaries

and Islam requires them to be paid from state revenues, not from public properties

News:

Under governmental sponsorship and direction, an electronic campaign was launched under the hashtag #MySalaryInAlAhliBank. Many Yemeni activists interacted during the past two days with the campaign, which clearly exposes the reality of the ongoing siege on Yemen and the connection of the Saudi-American aggression to the continuing tragedy of the Yemenis for more than ten years. The campaign was launched at a time when popular discontent is escalating due to the interruption of salaries and the deterioration of economic conditions due to the unjust siege imposed by the aggression on our country, and its seizure of oil and gas revenues and their transfer to accounts outside the country, most notably the Saudi National Bank, with the collusion of Yemeni traitors and mercenaries. (Dhamar News, 10/28/2025)

Comment:

The people of Yemen are caught between the heat of Al-Alimi's government and the fire of the Houthis' government. The former is destroying services and has recently started cutting teachers' salaries, and the Houthi government is continuing to punish people. This justification promoted by the Houthis is not based on a legitimate basis, but rather is a deliberate misrepresentation to cover up their failure to take care of people's affairs and fulfill the requirements of ruling by Islam.

Salaries and wages in Islam are a right of the state, paid from its own revenues such as fay', jizya, kharaj, and all state property resources, not from the revenues of oil, gas, minerals, and other resources, because the latter are public properties that Sharia has made for all Muslims, the state does not own them, and it is not permissible to withhold them from the nation, or to take them as a pretext to evade duties.

As for the Houthi government, it collects huge revenues from all sources, legitimate and illegitimate, whether what is considered state property or what it imposes of forbidden taxes such as sales tax and permanent taxes called government tax, or public revenues such as fees for wired and wireless communications, internet service, transportation, fisheries, the coastline, minerals, salt, water, and other public properties... Where does all this revenue go, given the government's evasion of any of its responsibilities to the people, such as food, water, housing, clothing, job opportunities, education, medical care, security, justice, and other rights of the people over the state?!

As for the government of the Al-Alimi Council, it does not need to be explained in its failure and subservience, as the stench of their corruption has spread and no house has been spared.

Therefore, withholding salaries from employees is a clear injustice, which falls under the severe warning uttered by the Prophet ﷺ in his saying: "Allah said: There are three whom I will be their adversary on the Day of Resurrection... and a man who hired a worker, took full work from him, and did not give him his wages." narrated by Al-Bukhari. As for the wealth of public property that they argue with, Islam has made it common among Muslims, according to the saying of the Prophet ﷺ "Muslims are partners in three things: water, pasture, and fire, and its price is haram." narrated by Ibn Majah.

There is no difference in this between the Houthi government and the Al-Alimi government, as they all rule with an unjust capitalist system, collecting money in one direction, but rather they use it to starve people and keep them under the weight of poverty, ignorance, and worldly conflicts, and they thereby serve the interests of their masters in the West, America and Britain, and in keeping Muslims degraded in thought and economy and living in the worst conditions, and their biggest concern is to secure a livelihood so that the nation does not rise up to restore its caliphate and rule by the Sharia of its Lord.

Any pretext after this is nothing but injustice and confiscation of people's rights in fictitious names such as aggression, siege, resistance, and even jihad and supporting Gaza, while in reality the money is driven into the pockets of the ruling class and centers of influence, converted into hard currency and handed over to the tools of colonialism in exchange for their services in keeping our governments in power!

The economic policy in Islam is based on fulfilling rights and ensuring justice among the people, not on monopoly, looting, and using crises as pretexts.

If the Islamic system were applied, as explained in the draft constitution of the caliphate state presented by Hizb ut-Tahrir, the treasury would be fulfilling its tasks, and every worker, indeed every individual of the state's subjects, would have his guaranteed right, without favor from anyone. As for under the current harmful systems, the suffering of the people will remain evidence of the absence of the righteous caliphate that rules by Sharia and gives rights to their owners.

 This recurring suffering in Yemen is but a witness to the absence of ruling according to what God has revealed, and to the necessity of resuming the Islamic way of life by establishing the righteous caliphate on the method of Prophethood that takes care of people's affairs in the best way and gives everyone his due. God Almighty said: ﴿And do not consume one another's wealth unjustly﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Abu Bakr Al-Jabali - Yemen Province

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari