The Two-State Solution Between Idea and Reality
News:
Erdogan: Maintaining the Gaza agreement is extremely important... and the two-state solution is a basic condition for lasting peace. (Asharq)
Comment:
The two-state solution is called for by most countries in the world, led by America, the originator of the idea and its promoter. The question that arises is: What are the implementation obstacles to this idea? Is America serious about implementing it on the ground? Was the idea put forward as a problematic idea that fuels the conflict in the Middle East, the Islamic countries, and the Jewish entity, allowing America to remain in the region and tighten its control over it?
The two-state solution is based on an intellectual basis that arose in America in the face of a British project, which is the one secular state, which fell and did not stand up to the two-state solution project. The two-state solution project is based on the idea that there should be two neighboring states, one for the Jewish entity located on 75% of the land of Palestine, and the other on 25% of what remains of Palestine. But there are obstacles that were not taken into account, which are hindering this project, or the Americans deliberately overlooked them, which are:
The first obstacle: the doctrinal dimension: In Islam, Palestine is an endowment land, and related to the creed of the Ummah. Recognizing the Jewish entity, even on one inch of it, is absolutely forbidden, whether that recognition is coerced or due to ignorance of its ruling. As for those who know the ruling on the land of Palestine, the Prophet's ﷺ nocturnal journey, and its connection to Mecca as the first of the two Qiblas and the third of its mosques to which people travel, which was opened by the Commander of the Faithful, Al-Farooq Omar, may God be pleased with him, and he received its keys, and whose land was kneaded with the blood of millions of martyrs since the Omari conquest, then whoever acknowledges or agrees to the one-state project or the two-state project is undoubtedly a transgressor, and a hypocrite with known hypocrisy. And the rule of the land of Islam is that if an inch of it is usurped, jihad becomes an individual obligation on every Muslim man and woman until it is recovered and the invader and occupier are expelled, even if some are martyred in that cause.
The second obstacle: the dispute over historical heritage: The Jewish entity and the Muslims are in dispute over this land, and both parties claim their right to it. It is a historical heritage for both sides that prevents one of them from monopolizing it without the other.
The third obstacle: the necessities of life: If - hypothetically - a Palestinian state were established on what remains of the West Bank, how would it be viable when it does not possess any of its basic necessities?
The fourth obstacle: Al-Aqsa Mosque: Al-Aqsa Mosque, which the Jewish entity claims is built on their alleged temple, which cannot be built except by removing Al-Aqsa Mosque. This threat alone will cause an explosion in the region, which will be a barrier and obstacle to achieving the two-state project.
If all those obstacles are known, and above them the demographic factor, it becomes clear that the project is a problematic construction project intended to keep the conflict and dispute at its peak and keep the region's papers in America's hands, arranging them as it wishes and igniting them whenever it wishes, and gathering countries behind it like a herd that hears its echo.
Therefore, this problem cannot be solved except with a radical treatment and solution, which is the establishment of the nation's eternal project; the Caliphate according to the method of Prophethood, through which Islamic life is resumed, and the entity and America's influence are uprooted from all Muslim countries.
Written for the Central Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir
Salem Abu Subaitan
