Erdogan's Speech at the United Nations: Words Without Action!
Erdogan's Speech at the United Nations: Words Without Action!

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
October 02, 2025

Erdogan's Speech at the United Nations: Words Without Action!

Erdogan's Speech at the United Nations: Words Without Action!

(Translated)

News:

In his speech before the United Nations General Assembly, Erdogan described what is happening in Gaza as genocide, stressing that the entity of the Jews is killing children daily, and called on the international system to take action. He published pictures from Gaza, and said: "There is no war in Gaza; it is a policy of occupation, displacement and massacres."

He repeated his famous phrase "the world is bigger than five," criticizing the structure of the United Nations, and announced that relations with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and America are strengthening, and that Turkey will host the alliance summit in 2026. Other highlights of his speech included a focus on the environment, artificial intelligence, waste reduction, and the family.

Comment:

Erdogan drew attention to many global issues, especially the issue of Palestine. However, his words, from an Islamic perspective, are considered hollow, detached from reality, and not free from the restrictions of the global colonial system.

Erdogan's words may have touched emotions, especially with regard to Palestine. But from an Islamic point of view, the biggest flaw in this speech is that these strong words are not translated into actions. While the children of Gaza are dying of starvation, and the sector is turning into a camp of death and destruction under a comprehensive siege, the voice of the oppressed is nothing more than words.

His criticism of the United Nations was also superficial. The United Nations, which is called to "reform," is the same system established by the oppressors. The nation's duty is not to revive it, but to establish a new world order based on Islam. Erdogan's repeated phrase "the world is bigger than five" seems to be a criticism of the five-member Security Council. While this phrase resonates positively with peoples who despise the global order, the truth is that America itself is dissatisfied with the post-World War II system it created and seeks to change. Therefore, Erdogan's call for reform is in line with America's own interests.

Moreover, Erdogan's praise of strengthening relations with NATO is a humiliation for Muslims, not an honor for them. Cooperation with an organization that has killed millions of Muslims from Afghanistan to Iraq, and from Syria to Libya, is not a matter of pride, but a matter of shame.

Also, the idea of a "two-state solution" is the product of a colonial mentality. In the Palestinian and Cypriot contexts, this phrase only means recognizing the existence of Jews on the land of Palestine and the Greek presence on the island of Cyprus. However, both are occupied. The solution does not lie in legitimizing and recognizing these two occupations, but in ending them.

Although Erdogan's speech included remarkable words and remarks, it carries no weight when compared to Turkey's actual political position over the past two years amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

The details of Erdogan's meeting with Trump after his speech at the United Nations reveal how Turkey, despite its enormous strategic location and great power dynamics, has fallen into a state of weakness. Major agreements were concluded with America, the full extent of which has not yet been revealed. Among its provisions are the construction of civil nuclear facilities in Turkey, Turkish Airlines purchasing hundreds of passenger planes from America, F-35 and F-16 fighter jets, military equipment, the transfer of liquefied natural gas via American ships, and even the allocation of some rare earth minerals from Turkey to America.

Trump's welcoming of Erdogan upon his arrival, his application of high-level protocol, his pulling out of his chair, sitting next to him, holding a private meeting that lasted more than two hours, and his repeated praise of him are not without reason.

The words of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio are expressive, as he said: "All other countries, including Turkey, are practically begging us to intervene in these matters... In the end, there are leaders who are begging to participate in this. They call and say: Can we shake hands with the President for five minutes?"

While many world leaders are begging to shake hands with Trump for five minutes, Erdogan's two-hour meeting indicates the enormous concessions that Turkey has made and the new roles that it is scheduled to assume in implementing American regional plans!

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Ramzi Uzeir

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari