The Train Project Between China and Indonesia: A Strategy for Chinese Hegemony over Indonesia
The Train Project Between China and Indonesia: A Strategy for Chinese Hegemony over Indonesia

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 19, 2025

The Train Project Between China and Indonesia: A Strategy for Chinese Hegemony over Indonesia

The Train Project Between China and Indonesia: A Strategy for Chinese Hegemony over Indonesia

News:

Indonesia is considering renegotiating the debts of the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed train project, known as "Whoosh," due to the significant financial burden it places on the Indonesian Railway Company (KAI). State-Owned Enterprises Minister Erick Thohir said that the plan would allow KAI to manage the trains while the state takes responsibility for the infrastructure. The $7.3 billion project was mainly financed by loans from the China Development Bank, with an initial interest rate of 2%. However, disruptions caused by the Corona pandemic and land acquisition issues drove costs up, necessitating additional financing at 3.4% interest. Although the project succeeded in reducing the travel time between Jakarta and Bandung to just 45 minutes and transporting 2.9 million passengers in early 2025, it caused significant debt pressure. KAI recorded losses of 1.24 trillion rupiah from the project in the first half of 2025. Erick emphasized that resolving this issue must precede the expansion of the Jakarta-Surabaya high-speed train project. (Source)

Comment:

Since its inception, the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed train project (Whoosh) has faced widespread criticism from various parties, ranging from economists and academics to ordinary people. The most prominent of these criticisms revolve around the exorbitant cost of the project, which exceeded 100 trillion rupiah, largely financed by loans from the China Development Bank. Despite repeated warnings and objections, the government insisted on proceeding with the project under the pretext of modernizing the transportation sector and reducing travel time. However, reality shows that the Jakarta-Bandung transport line was already served by many accessible and widely available means such as regular trains, buses and travel services. Therefore, this project seems more like a political showpiece project than a real solution to the public transport needs in Indonesia.

Now, after its operation, the problems that were previously warned about have actually begun to appear. The project has become a huge financial burden on the Indonesian Railway Company (KAI), which continues to record significant losses. Indonesia is now preparing to renegotiate its debts with China, which reveals that the project was not carefully planned from the beginning. Beyond the financial aspect, this project reflects how Indonesia has become more connected to China's political and economic interests. As the main creditor, China has significant influence that allows it to influence Indonesia's policies, both economically and diplomatically.

On a broader scale, the high-speed train is just one example of China's deepening grip on the Indonesian economy. In the nickel sector, for example, Chinese companies dominate the entire production chain from upstream to downstream, often bringing in large numbers of their workers. In addition, non-metallic products such as electronics and consumer goods flood the local market, making Indonesia increasingly dependent on Chinese imports. As a result, the huge potential of the Indonesian market and its natural resources no longer primarily benefit its people, but are exploited by foreign powers.

Ironically, after decades of Western hegemony through European and American multinational corporations, it seems that Indonesia has simply moved to a new master, China, which has become a prominent player. China's economic hegemony is no less fierce, and the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed train project is just one of its gateways. Ultimately, without careful planning and courage in protecting economic sovereignty, Indonesia may lose control of its vast potential, leaving its citizens as mere spectators in their homeland.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Central

Abdullah Aswar

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari