Another Muslim in Secular Positions is Not Strength, But Party Bias
Another Muslim in Secular Positions is Not Strength, But Party Bias

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
November 05, 2025

Another Muslim in Secular Positions is Not Strength, But Party Bias

Another Muslim in Secular Positions is Not Strength, But Party Bias

(Translated)

News:

The Washington Post reported that Ghazala Hashmi, an Indian Muslim woman, launched her first political campaign in the American state of Virginia. The article boasted that if elected lieutenant governor of Virginia, she would be the first Muslim woman in the country to hold a state-level position.

Pictures were published alongside the article showing her taking a selfie at a Hindu Gurdwara temple as part of her election campaign.

Hindu Delegate J.J. Singh (D-Loudoun) praised her, saying, "She will be the first Indian to hold a state-wide position. We are really showing the rest of the country that Virginia is in a position to embrace diversity, we are not divided on the basis of bigotry."

Ghazala expresses that her faith and ethnicity are not the driving force behind her election campaign. She is seeking the part-time position of lieutenant governor to serve as an initial barrier to what she described as the chaos of President Donald Trump's administration, not to be the first to unleash anything. Historically, she launched a campaign under the slogan "Ghazala Hashmi is an American name," seeking to attract immigrant voters and keep pace with the country's demographic changes.

She currently enjoys support from South Asians and Muslims who want to see her make history, as well as attacks from Republicans who exploit her religion.

These attacks often link her to the polarizing candidate for mayor of New York City, Zahran Mamdani, who is also a Muslim immigrant of Indian origin.

Since 2018, when Representatives Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) became the first two Muslim women in Congress, a small, albeit growing, list has won elected office.

By 2023, there were 95 elected Muslim women, according to the latest data from the Jetpac Resource Center and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

South Asians have also increasingly strengthened their political influence in recent years, with at least six Indian-American members joining Congress in the "Samosa Caucus," as they call themselves - including its newest member, Representative Suhas Subramaniam (D), from Northern Virginia.

"But these are not normal circumstances," commented Sahar Aziz, a professor of law at Rutgers University and author of "The Racial Muslim." Aziz added, "Every time a Muslim runs for office, they face punishment through election campaigns and fear campaigns and threats to their physical safety."

Prominent Muslim politicians such as Tlaib and Omar, members of Congress, have been described as "terrorists" or anti-democratic. In 2021, supervisors of a debate for the position of Democratic lieutenant governor of Virginia apologized after asking the only Muslim candidate in that primary election whether he could guarantee that his religion would not stand in the way of his elected office, a question that was not asked of any other candidate.

Comment:

The layers of contradiction with Islam in this article are so many that they deserve to be addressed one by one.

1- Being the first Muslim woman to represent a regime that seeks to kill Muslims and erase Islam in its internal and external policies is not something that is appreciated in the Islamic mindset. It is clearly forbidden and detested by God Almighty, not only because of the rulings regarding how women obtain political power, but also because of supporting the enemies of Islam, compromising Islam, and abusing it. ﴿Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah, except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.﴾.

2- The integration of Muslims into fictitious positions of power is actually a policy of compromising Islam in favor of prevailing secular and capitalist ideas. In this way, Muslims are used to undermine the true essence of Islam by making them role models in following part of Islam (the Qur'an and Sunnah) and leaving the rest. In this way, the false "wolf" leadership is covered with an Islamic "sheep"skin!

3- Hiding the true version of Islam behind the American version of it to create a division with other Muslims worldwide and a hatred of complete allegiance to God Almighty. Anyone who does not accept "renewal" is an extremist and must be exposed as unpatriotic. In this way, nationalism replaces the authentic creed (the Islamic creed).

4- The ridicule of Muslims who compromise their principles is not hidden, and God Almighty humiliates those who replace mixing with disbelief with pure ideas. The "samosa" referring to these Indian Muslims is a reflection of that.

5- Muslim women face a real danger in these supposedly "free" democratic countries. There is no safety and dignity except in the Khilafah, and the application of the correct political foundations inherited by the honorable caliphs after the Prophet ﷺ.

These explanations are sufficient to reject the play and farce of actors in a scenario written by people who have nothing but malice and hatred for the truth, and we, as Muslims, have only one voice in this matter; which is not to support false political distractions.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Umrana Muhammad

Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari