The July Charter is a Secular Project and a Betrayal of the People of Bangladesh
The July Charter is a Secular Project and a Betrayal of the People of Bangladesh

 News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
November 06, 2025

The July Charter is a Secular Project and a Betrayal of the People of Bangladesh

The July Charter is a Secular Project and a Betrayal of the People of Bangladesh

 News:

The National Consensus Committee's proposal to issue an executive order to implement the National Charter issued in July (Constitutional Reform), and to conduct a referendum based on it, has sparked a sharp division among political parties, and a dispute among legal professionals about its constitutional basis. The dispute revolves around two directions: politically, whether the order should be issued by the President or by the Chief Advisor of the Interim Government, and legally, whether such an order and referendum are possible at all within the existing constitutional framework.

Comment:

The National Consensus Committee failed to resolve the disputes over the National Charter issued in July, but rather revealed its fundamental flaws. Instead of uniting Bangladesh, the document has become a cause for division and a betrayal of the aspirations of its people. The Charter focuses on structural reforms in the democratic system and governance, as if the blood of the people that was shed against Hasina's regime was for democratic reforms!

The preamble of the Charter invokes the will of the people during the popular uprising, but it blatantly ignores mentioning Islam, which constitutes the core of the Bengali people's identity. This is a falsification of history, as it portrays the uprising as a purely secular project and obscures the fact that the main motivation behind it was the aspiration of the youth and the masses to overthrow the tyrannical regime from an Islamic standpoint.

This confirms that the Charter is nothing but a tool in the hands of the Western-backed interim government to eradicate any political presence of an Islamic nature from the public sphere. It sends a clear and frightening message: If you want to participate in politics, you must abandon your authentic Islamic identity in favor of a secular version that is acceptable to the West and the state!

The current political disputes are merely symptoms of this deep structural defect. Secular politics in Bangladesh has a long history of division and failure. It has reduced governance to a game of power struggle, and a frantic race among the ambitious, where the discussion is not about the purpose or values ​​of governance, but about its mechanisms and form. The debate about the July Charter is not a discussion about a national vision, but a dispute between the elites over who sits at the head of the same eroded table.

The overthrow of Hasina was a necessity, but the betrayal of the interim government, the deception and inability of the previous political parties, reveals a deeper truth; which is that our problem is not with the government, but with the system itself. Bangladesh does not need a new government, but a new system. We cannot continue to put a patch of failed democracy on a wound that needs radical treatment. Bangladesh yearns for an alternative policy, an alternative system of governance, alternative leadership, and an alternative way of life. People are fed up with the empty promises of positive systems that put power above principle, and the party above the nation.

The time has come to move beyond this democratic illusion. The real change that we seek will not be achieved in the articles of a corrupt charter or in the halls of a secular parliament, but in adopting a system that unites us under the banner of our faith, a system based on divine justice, true mercy, and leadership that serves the nation, not itself. Bangladesh is not waiting for another secular party, but is waiting for the true change that can only be achieved by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate according to the method of Prophethood, for it is the true charter, and the only future that promises liberation and dignity.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Irtiza Choudhury - Bangladesh Province

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari