Russian Drones in Poland. Coincidence or by Arrangement?
Russian Drones in Poland. Coincidence or by Arrangement?

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 23, 2025

Russian Drones in Poland. Coincidence or by Arrangement?

Russian Drones in Poland. Coincidence or by Arrangement?

(Translated)

News:

On September 11, DW reported that (on the night of September 10, at least 19 Russian drones crossed the Polish border, with a large number of them coming from Belarus. In addition to the Polish Air Force, fighter jets from other NATO countries were also deployed to intercept them. The wreckage of these aircraft damaged a residential building in the village of Wierejki near the border with Belarus and Ukraine, but there were no casualties. Warsaw stated that Russia deliberately attacked Poland, and requested consultations with its NATO allies in accordance with Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told the Bundestag that Russian drones were clearly launched deliberately on Polish territory. According to him, there is no reason to believe that this was a course correction error.

The Russian Ministry of Defense responded by saying that it does not plan to strike targets in Poland. The Chief of the General Staff of the Polish Armed Forces, General Wiesław Kukuła, said that the Polish army had received a warning from Belarus about the movement of drones. He said: "The Belarusians warned us that drones were heading towards us through their airspace.").

Comment:

For several years, Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that he has no intention of attacking NATO countries. His last statement was in St. Petersburg on June 19. At that time, Putin denied claims that Russia was planning to attack NATO countries. Today, Russia is not ready to open a new front, but perhaps there is a plan behind this aggression against Poland, Romania and the Baltic states, and it is not coming from Russia itself, but is most likely one of the United States' maneuvers.

On July 10, in an interview with the American channel NBC, Trump stated: "We send weapons to NATO, and NATO pays for them in full. Thus, the weapons we send to NATO are sent, and then NATO supplies Ukraine with these weapons, and NATO pays for them."

A few days later, some European countries objected to this statement. France, Italy and the Czech Republic refused to pay for American weapons for Ukraine. A few days later, in an interview with TASS news agency, Viktor Vodolatsky, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, said: "The refusal of four European countries to buy weapons from the United States for later transfer to Ukraine is a transient phenomenon. In any case, Trump will convince them of this, and they will do what he says." Where does this confidence come from? Perhaps he knows some details of the agreements between Putin and Trump.

Shortly after these events, on September 4, Trump announced that America would stop funding the armed forces of Eastern European countries. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were the main recipients of the funds. America justified these measures with Trump's policy of re-evaluating and redistributing foreign aid, and the need for Europe to take responsibility for its own defense. These American actions and statements, which leave Europe unprotected from the Russian threat, reveal an intention to encourage Europe to buy American weapons more quickly. This is supported by the lack of a firm response from America and NATO to the violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones, except for strengthening border security. In return, Poland has asked its NATO allies to provide it with air defense systems and technologies to combat drones.

It is worth noting that Russian drones flew from Belarus, and President Lukashenko had appeared on the scene before that. Trump had spoken with Lukashenko by telephone the day before his meeting with Putin in Alaska on August 15. Negotiations between America and Lukashenko began long before that. Some sanctions were lifted against Belarus in exchange for the release of political prisoners, including Americans, a new development in the history of Lukashenko's rule.

Until now, Europe has been talking about Ukraine as a buffer zone on its southern borders, but the Russian threat on its northern borders via Belarus remains unresolved. The United States has left the Baltic states without assistance, and is establishing relations with Lukashenko, which has greatly concerned Europe, and will likely push it to buy American weapons immediately.

The Baltic states, Poland and other countries have always served American interests faithfully, whether in Europe or in the Middle East, but despite this, America easily uses them as a bargaining chip. Friendship with America brings good to no one. Here, it is necessary to quote Henry Kissinger, who said after the famous events in South Vietnam: "Being an enemy of America is dangerous, but being a friend of America is fatal."

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Eldar Khamzin

Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari