Reducing Islamic Education Classes in Favor of Music and Arts! A Branch of a Drawn Policy to Secularize the State and Society in Syria
Reducing Islamic Education Classes in Favor of Music and Arts! A Branch of a Drawn Policy to Secularize the State and Society in Syria

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
October 09, 2025

Reducing Islamic Education Classes in Favor of Music and Arts! A Branch of a Drawn Policy to Secularize the State and Society in Syria

Reducing Islamic Education Classes in Favor of Music and Arts!

A Branch of a Drawn Policy to Secularize the State and Society in Syria

News:

The Syrian Minister of Education sparked widespread controversy in educational and religious circles, following his sudden decision to reduce religious education classes in schools from four to two per week, and to abolish the subject of the Holy Quran and its etiquette, replacing them with music and arts, in a move that many considered an uncalculated educational gamble. Observers believe that the minister has placed himself in direct confrontation with the conservative religious movement, after this decision, which was considered shocking in a country that has always given religious education a wide space within the curricula. (Arabi24, 10/5/2025)

Comment:

This is a new shock received by the people of Syria with the Ministry of Education's decision to reduce religious education and Islamic culture classes from four classes per week to two classes. In favor of what? In favor of music and arts! It becomes clear that the educational aspect has not been spared from the secularization policy pursued by the new Damascus authority. The four classes that were allocated to Islamic culture are originally much less than the required amount that should be allocated to Islamic upbringing, as it is less than the average of one class per day, and yet it was reduced by half! It was natural that this decision would provoke the religious people of Syria who love their religion and who expected that the fall of the regime of crime, immorality, and vice would highlight the Islamic identity of Syria, and not marginalize it.

The most dangerous thing in the scene is that the protests focused on the demand to maintain the four classes without reduction, so that if the authority fulfilled their demand, they would leave satisfied and happy with their victory over the aggressive minister! However, the state's duty in the field of systematic education is far beyond just four classes. It is not the issue that there are few classes allocated to religious education while all other culturally-oriented subjects have no relation to religion.

The principle in the policy of systematic education is that its primary goal is to form the Islamic personality, before the goal that is next in importance, which is the student's acquisition of the skills and competencies that qualify him to choose his scientific specialization at the university level, or his profession or craft in the labor market. Accordingly, the duty is to allocate to Islamic culture and Islamic sciences no less than half of the curriculum. The issue is not just memorizing surahs from the Quran and teaching prayer and fasting. Rather, the duty is to teach students summaries and introductions to Islamic sciences in general, in order for schools and universities to produce Islamic personalities who deal with all of life on the basis of Islamic creed and in accordance with Islamic concepts and laws, not to produce people who carry Western culture in the fields of society, politics, economics, civilization, philosophy, and legislation with a margin of religiosity in individual and family behavior only. This battle that many sincere people are fighting now for two classes, despite its expression of jealousy for religion and the future of generations, is very limited. It must go much further than that, so that its demand is to establish systematic education based on Islamic creed, and its policy and goal is to produce Islamic personalities equipped with all Islamic sciences.

More importantly than all of this, the people of Syria should realize that this sin of the Minister of Education is only a branch of the great sin committed by the new rulers of Syria, which is the policy of secularizing the state and the country and establishing rule by disbelief, so that the achievement of the revolution of the righteous people of Syria is limited to merely overthrowing the criminal clique that ruled the country for half a century with fire, iron, and crime, while Syria remains a secular, functional state and a member of a regional system subordinate to the international system led by the Pharaoh of the age, America.

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Ahmed Al-Qasas

Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari