Trump and Putin: From love to hate is only one step away
Trump and Putin: From love to hate is only one step away

News:

0:00 0:00
Speed:
October 08, 2025

Trump and Putin: From love to hate is only one step away

Trump and Putin: From love to hate is only one step away

(Translated)

News:

Putin threatened Trump to cut ties if Ukraine gets Tomahawk missiles from the United States.

Comment:

Over the past two weeks, we have seen a series of news reports indicating a shift in the policy of the current US administration towards Russia and its invasion of Ukraine.

On September 23, Trump suddenly announced: "I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is able to fight and win, and restore all its territory to its original borders."

On the same day, he also said: "Ukraine can not only recover all its territory, but it can also move forward." He added: "Russia doesn't seem impressive. For them, this was supposed to be quick. It seems the war is not over yet."

On September 26, he stated: "The Russian economy is heading for the abyss. They are bombing everything in sight, and are only taking very little land, if any. In fact, they are losing some of it."

On September 29, the US Special Envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, announced that Trump had authorized Ukraine to carry out long-range strikes on Russia. On October 2, news reported that Trump had signed an order authorizing the Pentagon and intelligence agencies to assist Ukraine in such strikes.

For the first time, the Trump administration will help Ukraine in long-range attacks. The United States has asked NATO allies to provide similar support to Ukraine. The possibility of supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk and Barracuda missiles is being considered.

In light of this news, it can be assumed that Russia has rejected America's terms for resolving the Ukrainian crisis.

As is known, Russia, several months before the meeting between the American and Russian presidents in Alaska, insisted as a basic condition on Ukraine's recognition of the Crimean Peninsula and the occupied territories in eastern Ukraine for Russia. It seems that Russia, having learned from the bitter experience of the Minsk agreements, fully realizes that any other frozen conflict in exchange for concessions to America will be like a bite from the same snake again. In 2015, Russia intervened - believing America's promises to overlook its aggression against Ukraine - in the Syrian conflict on behalf of America's agent, Bashar al-Assad. This led to the prolongation of al-Assad's rule in Syria, as the United States had not yet found a suitable alternative to him.

In 2022, when Russia realized that no one intended to recognize its control over the annexed Crimean Peninsula and occupied Donbas, it launched an all-out invasion of Ukraine.

By late 2024, the Assad regime had exhausted its forces and was replaced by Ahmed al-Shara, backed by Turkey. Russia realized that it had been exploited, so it was expelled from Syria.

Since then, Russia realizes that any truce or freezing of the conflict in Ukraine would be suicide. That is why it insists so strongly on recognizing its control over the Crimean Peninsula and Donbas.

As for the American negotiating position regarding Ukraine, it goes beyond the current crisis. In essence, the United States is exploiting the conflict in Ukraine to force Russia to cooperate in confronting China.

China today is surrounded on three sides by US allies, most notably Japan, South Korea, India, and Pakistan, along with other regional countries.

A potential alliance between Russia and China would allow China to break this near-complete blockade and access Russia's vast natural resources, which would greatly enhance its military and economic power.

As for China's position, it remains cautious, as it is not ready to actively support Russia at the expense of its extensive trade relations with the United States and the European Union.

It is worth noting that the United States wants to keep the door slightly open, as it is not seeking a comprehensive solution to the Ukrainian crisis, because Russia involved in its invasion will be more flexible. A complete settlement of the Ukrainian crisis, in exchange for a joint move against China, would allow Russia, at any moment, to move away from the West and embrace China.

On the other hand, Russia's fresh wounds after its humiliating expulsion from Syria remind us that agreeing to another Minsk-like agreement is like stepping on the same shovel twice.

Therefore, it was not surprising that Trump stated, as soon as the talks ended: "Now it really depends on President Zelensky to get the job done."

It is noteworthy that this is the same Trump who rebuked President Zelensky in the Oval Office on February 28, 2025, claiming that he had no real arguments and that he depended entirely on American arms supplies.

For its part, Ukraine, as expected, rejected Russia's conditions for recognizing the Crimean Peninsula and Donbas for Russia. On September 15, 2025, the Ukrainian Minister of Finance, Serhiy Marchenko, acknowledged the failure of the peace talks, saying: "We must prepare the army and the people for another year of war, and this will require more money."

On September 19, Rustem Umerov, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine and chief Ukrainian negotiator, stated: "Ukraine is not currently negotiating with Russia to end the war."

A few days later, starting on September 23, President Trump radically changed his rhetoric towards Russia and its invasion of Ukraine.

In conclusion, it is worth noting that the Ukrainian crisis reaffirms that countries, with their sovereignty, resources, lives, and blood, remain hostage to the conflict between the great powers.

Even the great powers that present themselves as friends and defenders of oppressed countries are, in fact, the main instigators and beneficiaries of conflicts. And all that is raised about the right of peoples to self-determination and independence, human rights, and concern for women, the elderly, and children, is nothing but a cover for their vile policies. This situation will continue until the return of the true divine rule of the world represented by the Second Rightly Guided Caliphate according to the method of Prophethood, whose true goal will be the good of all humanity, not empty slogans.

﴿Then they will shake their heads at you and say, "When will that be?" Say, "Perhaps it will be soon."

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir Central

Fadl Amzaev

Head of the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir in Ukraine

More from null

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

The Gaza Ceasefire is a Cover for Preparing a New Reality with Blood and Rubble

News:

An Al Jazeera investigation based on satellite image analysis revealed patterns of systematic destruction carried out by the occupation in Gaza between October 10th and 30th.

The "Sanad" news verification agency of the Al Jazeera network monitored the demolitions, engineering destruction, and heavy aerial bombardment carried out by the occupation inside the sector since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement. (Al Jazeera Net)

Comment:

After the announcement of the mined war ceasefire on the Gaza Strip, sponsored by Trump and in agreement with some Arab countries, it was clear that it was concluded in favor of the Jewish entity. This is evidenced by satellite image analysis and recent news reports, indicating that the Jewish army demolished thousands of buildings in Gaza, especially in Shuja'iyya and Khan Yunis in the areas under its control, as well as Rafah and the areas east of it, which witnessed extensive bulldozing operations.

The comprehensive destruction in Gaza is not random but carries far-reaching strategic goals, such as destroying the environment that incubates the resistance. Emptying Gaza of its infrastructure, schools, and housing makes it difficult for the resistance to reorganize itself or rebuild its capabilities. This is a long-term deterrent achieved by destroying capabilities and imposing a new reality that exhausts Gaza and leaves it economically paralyzed and uninhabitable, paving the way for accepting any political or security solutions, or even the idea of displacement. Because leaving Gaza in ruins makes it difficult for its people to rebuild it alone, countries and organizations will intervene with political conditions, and the occupation realizes that whoever rebuilds has the decision-making power. Today's destruction is for political control tomorrow!

In fact, describing the Gaza war ceasefire agreement as "mined" was not in vain, because it was partial and excluded alleged military targets, allowing the Jews to continue raids and destruction under security pretexts. It was also concluded by the largest supporter of the entity without strong international guarantees, making it fragile and susceptible to violation, especially in the absence of international accountability, which makes the Jewish entity above accountability.

How long will we remain a submissive, subservient, and watching nation over a weakened, exhausted, lost, and starved people?! And above all, permissible at all times?! Let us all be Saladin Al-Ayyubi, for Gaza today reminds the nation that Saladin was not just a brave individual, but a leader in a state that carries a project, owns an army, and has a united nation behind it. Therefore, the call to be Saladin does not mean individual heroism, but rather working to establish a state that makes all the sons of the nation soldiers in one rank under one banner.

Allah Almighty said: ﴿And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children﴾.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir Radio

Manal Umm Obaidah

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

Abdul Malik al-Houthi does not donate from his own money or his father's!

News:

Yemen Sanaa TV broadcast the humanitarian program "My Homeland" on Wednesday evening, 11/12/2025. In the segment "We are with you," the program presented the case of a woman who contracted a rare disease and needs to travel to India at a cost of $80,000. $70,000 was collected from charities and benefactors, but the program presenter spent a long time praising the last donor of ten thousand dollars, which turned out to be Abdul Malik al-Houthi, and praised his repeated role in supporting the humanitarian cases that appear on the program.

Commentary:

In Islam, the ruler has a great responsibility, which is to take care of the people's affairs by spending on what benefits them and providing everything that gives them comfort. He is originally a servant to them and cannot enjoy life until he is reassured about their conditions. This task is not a favor or a concession, but rather a legal duty that Islam has obligated him to, and he is considered negligent if he neglects it. Islam has obligated the nation to hold him accountable for negligence. Peace and blessings be upon him, he said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, it is superficial to rejoice when rulers or the state pay attention to some needs and call that humanitarian work, when it is originally a mandatory pastoral work.

One of the most dangerous concepts that capitalism and its rule have established in the world is the state's disavowal of care and leaving the care of people to charitable institutions and associations run by individuals or groups, to which people often turn to help them and meet their needs. The idea of ​​associations first appeared in Europe during the World Wars, when many families lost their breadwinners and became in need of a sponsor, and the state, according to the capitalist democratic system, is not a caretaker of affairs, but rather a protector of freedoms only. The rich feared the revolution of the poor against them, so they established these associations.

Islam has made the existence of the Sultan obligatory to take care of the affairs of the nation, to preserve its legitimate rights, and to meet its six basic needs that must be satisfied for individuals and the community. Food, clothing and housing must be provided by the state to all members of the flock, individual by individual, Muslims and non-Muslims, and security, medical care and education are provided by the state free of charge to everyone. A man came to the Caliph of Muslims, Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, with his wife and his six daughters, and said: (O Omar, these are my six daughters and their mother, feed them, clothe them, and be for them a shield against time) Omar said: (What if I don't do that?!) The Bedouin said: (I will leave) Omar said: (What if you leave?) He said: (You will be asked about their condition on the Day of Resurrection, standing before God, either to hell or to paradise) Omar said: (This nation will not be lost as long as there are people like these in it).

O Muslims: This is not imagination, but rather Islam, which made care an obligation on the Caliph of the Muslims for every individual in the flock. The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The Imam is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock." Therefore, we must restore these rulings and make them applicable. God Almighty said: ﴿Indeed, God will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.﴾ What will change our condition to justice and prosperity is Islam.

Written for the radio of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Sadiq Al-Sarari