Al Raya Newspaper: The US-Venezuela Crisis
November 11, 2025

Al Raya Newspaper: The US-Venezuela Crisis

Al Raya sahafa

2025-11-12

Al Raya Newspaper: The US-Venezuela Crisis

American governments' interest in Venezuela dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century, since the discovery of oil in huge quantities, where American energy companies controlled the oil for decades, but the Venezuelan government nationalized it in 1976.

Venezuela suffered a major economic deterioration and political instability until Hugo Chavez came to power in 1998, and Venezuela became close to Russia, China and Iran, and followed socialist left-wing policies until his death in 2013. He was succeeded by Nicolas Maduro, who followed the same socialist approach as Chavez, so the economy deteriorated further and Venezuela became more isolated, as America imposed many sanctions on it and refused to recognize the legitimacy of its presidential elections. In 2020, the US Department of Justice accused President Maduro of drug trafficking and smuggling into America.

Venezuela is one of the richest countries in the world in natural resources, as it ranks first globally in oil reserves, estimated at more than 300 billion barrels, and also has the fourth largest reserve of natural gas in the world with more than 195 trillion cubic feet.

In recent months, America has escalated its actions against Venezuela under the pretext of the war on drug trafficking that reaches it. On August 9th, it deployed three destroyers off the coast of Venezuela, and on September 2nd, it carried out the first air strike against what it claimed was a ship transporting drugs coming from Venezuela. On October 3, the US Secretary of War stated that he had ordered an attack on a boat transporting drugs off the same coast. As for his boss, Trump, he said that he had allowed the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct what he called "covert operations" inside Venezuela. In total, the US authorities have claimed responsibility for 15 attacks in recent weeks, which news reports say have resulted in the deaths of 62 people.

The American newspaper The New York Times published that some officials stated privately to it, saying that the goal behind all of this is to overthrow the Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, but officially, America is content with saying that its operations are aimed at pursuing Latin American terrorist gangs working in the field of drugs, which may be heading to the American borders.

What appears is that America, led by Trump, seeks to control Venezuela's very huge natural resources, especially oil, natural gas, gold and rare minerals. What further increases the tension is Venezuela's trade relations with China and Russia, where the volume of trade between China and Venezuela reached $6.5 billion in 2024, and the percentage is still increasing, which raises America's pressure and makes it more hostile towards this rapprochement, as Venezuela and other Latin American countries are considered by America to be its backyard and that it has the right to own its wealth, and that any approach to it is a red line that warrants inciting wars, as it did in the invasion of Panama in 1989 and the arrest of its president Noriega on charges of drug trafficking, and changing the regime in the country in accordance with its interests.

What we hear from conflicting statements from American politicians today about a military operation in Venezuela indicates that there is planning to change the regime in Venezuela in one of three scenarios:

The first: An internal rebellion led by the army, or by a civilian leadership, or in cooperation between them, provided that Washington provides logistical and intelligence support, or even direct military support through its current forces in the Caribbean. This scenario is unlikely to occur due to the division and weakness of the opposition, in addition to the strength of the security and intelligence services in the Venezuelan government.

The second: A crushing direct military force, which includes intensely striking Venezuelan military installations, with the possibility of tasking special forces units to arrest President Maduro and prosecute him. At the same time, creating an atmosphere for America's agents from the opposition, whose strength has recently emerged after the Venezuelan opposition leader Machado won the Nobel Peace Prize, which the international community demanded solidarity with, which is adopted by the Western and American media in particular, which those who hold this view believe that the strike may cause divisions in the structure of the regime, or the discontent of some military personnel, which makes them distance themselves from the collapsing regime.

The third: Political pressure, by Trump declaring victory after a series of naval strikes, and then returning to diplomatic channels to subjugate Venezuela in the fields of energy, immigration, regional security, signing economic cooperation deals and controlling the country's resources, and then the country entering an electoral process through which America guarantees the opposition's accession to power. What appears is that this is the closest scenario to being achieved, given the nature of Trump (the trade negotiator), who is trying to portray himself as a man of peace, and seeks to obtain the Nobel Peace Prize.

What confirms this trend is what Trump himself said on 2025/10/30 that he is not thinking of directing strikes against Venezuela, as he answered when a journalist on board Air Force One asked him about reports that he intends to launch strikes on Venezuela, saying "No." Furthermore, Maduro himself offered to hand over oil resources in exchange for stopping the escalation, but Trump rejected the offer. This means that Venezuela fears direct American intervention and prefers to resolve the crisis through negotiation.

What is remarkable in this crisis and other crises that America has fabricated later, such as annexing Canada, buying Greenland, or taking over Gaza, is that this country behaves with arrogance and unprecedented bullying, and this is not a sign of strength, but rather a sign of its weakness and disappointment, as described by the French thinker Emmanuel Todd in his book "After the Empire": (America uses excessive violence to hide its weakness, not to express its strength). Allah Almighty said: ﴿And never would your Lord have destroyed the cities unjustly while their people were reformers﴾.

By: Professor Khaled Ali - America

Source: Al Raya Newspaper

More from null

Al-Raya Newspaper: America's Mined Peace Agreement Between Morocco and Algeria - Trump's Recipe for Driving a Colonial Wedge!

Al Raya sahafa

2025-11-05

Al-Raya Newspaper:

America's Mined Peace Agreement Between Morocco and Algeria

Trump's Recipe for Driving a Colonial Wedge!

Steve Witkoff, US President Donald Trump's envoy to the Middle East, announced that his team is working to finalize a peace agreement between Algeria and Morocco in the coming period. This came in a television interview he and Jared Kushner gave on Sunday evening as part of the "60 Minutes" program on the American CBS channel. Witkoff said: "Our team is now working on Morocco and Algeria, and I expect to reach a peace agreement within 60 days."

The Sahara issue has been the most insidious file of the American-European colonial conflict in the west of the Islamic world since the mid-seventies of the last century. With the first and second Trump administrations and the strategic development that occurred to the file after Trump's recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over the Sahara and support for the autonomy plan as the only viable solution, which is part of what was called Trump's economic trade strategy and his vision of the world as a market for deals and the extent of the profit he will make, and time is a decisive factor in expediting the results, he views the Sahara as a virgin land rich in strategic minerals and a gateway to Africa for American capitalism and a basis for its political, military and economic influence in the Maghreb, which must be confiscated and its colonial influence extended over it.

America, with the capitalist Trump, is accelerating time to complete its colonial deal in its direct dealings with the two main parties; Morocco and Algeria, and Witkoff's statement about a peace agreement within the next sixty days and that his team is working on it, is an indication that the practical procedures and contacts with the parties concerned are happening and are a reality. This is what was confirmed by Massad Boulos, Trump's son-in-law and advisor on African affairs. He revealed in an interview with the Saudi Al-Sharq channel last week that "Algeria wants to find a radical and final solution to the Western Sahara issue, and is showing willingness to improve relations with Morocco," expressing his optimism about the possibility of resolving this dispute, and added, "He met with Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune (recently) and found a welcome to rebuild bridges of trust with the Moroccan people, and with the King, the government and the Moroccan state. In the end, the two countries are brotherly and neighboring peoples, united by a common history and a large number of values and interests."

As for Morocco, Massad Boulos stated, "The King's recent speech was historic, in which he affirmed his determination to work towards finding a final solution to the Sahara issue that is satisfactory to all parties, because what is required is a permanent and comprehensive solution."

This is an indication that the regimes in Morocco and Algeria are involved in the American colonial deal, in addition to Trump's employment of the Al Saud regime as a broker between the parties to speed up the completion of the deal. Tebboune and Mohammed VI each received two messages at the same time from Ibn Salman, which some estimates suggested were related to mediation to resolve differences between Rabat and Algiers. President Tebboune then stated in a speech he delivered before army leaders, broadcast in full on Friday, October 10, 2025, "There are some brothers with good intentions who are asking us to open the borders with Morocco to resolve the Sahara issue. The borders were not closed because of the Sahara issue, but they were closed for other reasons. 63 years of independence, our borders have been closed for more than 45 years."

This coincided with a change in the tone of political discourse in Algeria and its tendency towards appeasement, as Tebboune confirmed that he had received requests from those he described as "brothers" regarding the crisis between Algeria and Morocco, which included a request from Morocco to open the borders between the two countries, which would help resolve the conflict in the Sahara.

As for the striking thing in Witkoff's statement, it is his complete disregard and ignoring of the Polisario Front, and limiting the problem between Morocco and Algeria, in an indication of the possibility that the Trump administration has abandoned the Polisario card and has begun to rely on the economic and commercial deals strategy of the capitalist Trump in breaking down doors and uprooting locks to penetrate the two regimes directly without the Polisario tool.

As for Algeria and Morocco's involvement in the Trump deal, it is motivated by securing the continuation of the two regimes that are agents of Britain in particular, and their willingness to pay the exorbitant price in the hope of a false guarantee of security from American colonial domination over the region.

Trump's recognition of the Moroccanness of the Sahara and the disastrous results that followed were devastating for Morocco, and among its consequences:

- Enabling malicious American capitalism to exploit the resources of the Sahara, especially its rare strategic minerals

- Penetrating the country's agricultural sector through hybrid agriculture, genetically modified seeds, feed, and livestock by American capitalist monopolies, and seizing the rare fruits in Morocco such as prickly pears and argan trees and monopolizing them in the manufacture of cosmetics, in addition to the marine hunting farms project and monopolizing some marine products, in addition to other disasters.

- The most dangerous thing is America planting its colonial military leadership for Africa (Africom) in the heart of Morocco, and it is putting the finishing touches on transferring it to Morocco. The Hespress website (the regime's mouthpiece) stated that Morocco "nominated several cities to host it, such as Laayoune, Dakhla, Boujdour and Agadir, but the Americans showed a tendency to choose Kenitra or Ksar El Kebir, for historical, technical and logistical reasons, including the presence of a former American air base in Kenitra, and their desire to expand its runways to receive huge military aircraft that require special equipment."

The American military command for Africa will be the largest base for the American colonizer in the west of the Islamic world and in the heart of Morocco, and with it America will only accept complete loyalty and servitude to it, which means that the country is above a colonial volcano that will not take long to explode!

More shameful than that is normalization with the usurping Jewish entity and the political, economic and cultural Zionism that followed, and collusion and support for the genocide of Gaza.

As for the regime in Algeria, with the arrival of the American colonizer to the eastern and southern borders of Algeria, through the Sahel countries in the south, which America seized from the French colonizer, and then its penetration into Libya through its agent Haftar, the regime was placed between the jaws of American colonial pincers, which facilitated its blackmail and involvement in the Trump colonial deal.

Trump's America and its treacherous peace, after it seems that it threw the Polisario Front into the basket of its consumed tools and dropped it from its calculations, wants the Sahara as plunder for its companies, a base for its armies, a gateway to Africa to colonize it, and a penetration of all the Maghreb countries, and it brings the regimes of treason and shame in Morocco and Algeria as shameful witnesses to its malicious deal!

It is our ongoing tragedy as long as these regimes remain agents of colonialism, they were only regimes of harm and their rulers are agents who are custodians of the idols and deities of colonialism.

By: Professor Munaji Muhammad

Source: Al-Raya Newspaper