Al-Raya Newspaper: Is the conflict in Libya escalating again?
November 11, 2025

Al-Raya Newspaper: Is the conflict in Libya escalating again?

Al Raya sahafa

2025-11-12

Al-Raya Newspaper: Is the conflict in Libya escalating again?

In the heart of the Sahara, invisible lines extend, linking Darfur in Sudan to southern Libya, not only through the sands and ancient roads, but also through tribes, interests, and networks of influence that recognize no borders.

Since the fall of Gaddafi in 2011, an international conflict over Libya has erupted between America and Britain, and the conflict escalated until the new elected executive authority obtained 132 votes out of 188 in the Libyan House of Representatives on March 10, 2021. Thus, confidence was granted to the government of Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh - the candidate from the American envoy Stephanie Williams - after which the government of Fayez al-Sarraj was defeated and power was handed over easily.

After that, a political conflict broke out and some countries tried to use corrupt political money as bribes and to buy votes and loyalties. This was pointed out to the UAE and its attempt to influence the selection of members of the Libyan Dialogue Forum (Al Jazeera Net, 11/16/2020). After that, America's reliance on Haftar decreased and he temporarily withdrew from the political scene, and the entire political scene in Libya shifted in favor of America, with continuous attempts from Britain and European countries due to the presence of a political center and interests for countries such as France and Italy.

During this period of state absence, local tribal militias emerged in southern Libya, controlling smuggling and roads, and having close relations with groups from Darfur, especially from the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan Liberation Movement, where southern Libya was used as a safe haven to receive funding, training, or trade in gold and weapons. This happened between 2012 and 2015, after which Haftar came and expanded his influence from eastern Libya towards the south, benefiting from Egyptian support, and with the force of arms, Haftar achieved relative control. During that period, there were fighters from Darfur in Libya working as mercenaries, and the al-Bashir government was benefiting from that. After the fall of al-Bashir in 2019, the roots of the relationship between Sudan and Libya changed.

After the Libyan ceasefire agreement sponsored by the United Nations in 2020, calls were launched for the exit of foreign fighters from Libya, including Sudanese mercenaries, but many of them remained in Sabha, Murzuq, and Kufra, until 2022. After the outbreak of the war between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces in 2023, some factions resorted to southern Libya, and with Hemedti's victory now in Darfur after the massacre he committed in the last stronghold of Darfur in the city of Al-Fasher, there may be indications of the movement of tribes loyal to Hemedti in southern Libya, especially from the Tebu and Mahamid, and this will ignite the conflict in Libya again, especially in Fezzan, amid tensions between Haftar's forces and the Russian presence. We may witness Turkish intervention in response to Hemedti's movements. This may prompt Hemedti, on American orders of course, to enter southern Libya and create a tribal conflict according to the tribal expansion that supports him, which will support the secession of southern Libya from Libya or its division with the conflicting forces, and this will be Hemedti's way out.

Southern Libya is the most fragile region in Libya and is often outside the complete control of any party, and Hemedti has ambitions there. Hemedti may not aim to completely occupy southern Libya, but he may use it as leverage to achieve many goals, including:

* High leverage over Haftar through the presence of tribes that support him, through which he can impose a field balance around issues of gold and fuel trade, and even the Russian situation in Fezzan.

* The south intersects with the borders of Chad, Niger, and Sudan, which is a vital area for the trade of gold and uranium. By controlling this triangle, Hemedti's ability to manage cross-border mineral trade increases, and he may sign international deals with America, and the remaining parties will exit.

* He may make it a bargaining chip in files of immigration, energy, and border security, and thus make himself a party that cannot be ignored.

* Considering Darfur a natural extension of southern Libya in terms of tribe and geography, Hemedti will be granted a defensive depth against any threat from the Sudanese army or any hostile force from eastern Sudan and will strengthen the state of separation from Sudan.

Accordingly, the possibility of Hemedti's intervention in the Libyan arena seems more realistic due to what he will gain from it and within the ongoing transformations in Sudan, where he has consolidated his influence in western Sudan and seeks to expand his field of movement towards southern Libya, where tribal interests intersect and tribal separation occurs, and of course this agrees with America's view of the region to move the current borders to tribal borders, and also the fragility of the situation of the Libyan state allows him to think about such a step, and of course such a thing is not as easy as words, but it has a price that the Sudanese and Libyan people will pay and seas of Muslim blood, and all of this is related to the extent of Libya's ability to fortify its southern borders and the extent of America's acceptance of this plan.

The sad and painful thing is to see the lands of Muslims as arenas of conflict between their people to implement the plans of the West to tear apart what remains of our gathering, plunder our wealth, and prevent even thinking about the idea of unity because it always preoccupies us with ethnic, tribal, and sectarian conflicts...etc. to keep away the specter of just thinking about our return as one country.

The truth is that we will not get out of this vortex unless we nourish walking with Hizb ut-Tahrir to resume the Islamic way of life and establish the second righteous Caliphate on the method of Prophethood, the promise of God Almighty and the good news of His Messenger ﷺ.

By: Professor Nabil Abdul Karim

Source: Al-Raya Newspaper

More from null

Al-Raya Newspaper: America's Mined Peace Agreement Between Morocco and Algeria - Trump's Recipe for Driving a Colonial Wedge!

Al Raya sahafa

2025-11-05

Al-Raya Newspaper:

America's Mined Peace Agreement Between Morocco and Algeria

Trump's Recipe for Driving a Colonial Wedge!

Steve Witkoff, US President Donald Trump's envoy to the Middle East, announced that his team is working to finalize a peace agreement between Algeria and Morocco in the coming period. This came in a television interview he and Jared Kushner gave on Sunday evening as part of the "60 Minutes" program on the American CBS channel. Witkoff said: "Our team is now working on Morocco and Algeria, and I expect to reach a peace agreement within 60 days."

The Sahara issue has been the most insidious file of the American-European colonial conflict in the west of the Islamic world since the mid-seventies of the last century. With the first and second Trump administrations and the strategic development that occurred to the file after Trump's recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over the Sahara and support for the autonomy plan as the only viable solution, which is part of what was called Trump's economic trade strategy and his vision of the world as a market for deals and the extent of the profit he will make, and time is a decisive factor in expediting the results, he views the Sahara as a virgin land rich in strategic minerals and a gateway to Africa for American capitalism and a basis for its political, military and economic influence in the Maghreb, which must be confiscated and its colonial influence extended over it.

America, with the capitalist Trump, is accelerating time to complete its colonial deal in its direct dealings with the two main parties; Morocco and Algeria, and Witkoff's statement about a peace agreement within the next sixty days and that his team is working on it, is an indication that the practical procedures and contacts with the parties concerned are happening and are a reality. This is what was confirmed by Massad Boulos, Trump's son-in-law and advisor on African affairs. He revealed in an interview with the Saudi Al-Sharq channel last week that "Algeria wants to find a radical and final solution to the Western Sahara issue, and is showing willingness to improve relations with Morocco," expressing his optimism about the possibility of resolving this dispute, and added, "He met with Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune (recently) and found a welcome to rebuild bridges of trust with the Moroccan people, and with the King, the government and the Moroccan state. In the end, the two countries are brotherly and neighboring peoples, united by a common history and a large number of values and interests."

As for Morocco, Massad Boulos stated, "The King's recent speech was historic, in which he affirmed his determination to work towards finding a final solution to the Sahara issue that is satisfactory to all parties, because what is required is a permanent and comprehensive solution."

This is an indication that the regimes in Morocco and Algeria are involved in the American colonial deal, in addition to Trump's employment of the Al Saud regime as a broker between the parties to speed up the completion of the deal. Tebboune and Mohammed VI each received two messages at the same time from Ibn Salman, which some estimates suggested were related to mediation to resolve differences between Rabat and Algiers. President Tebboune then stated in a speech he delivered before army leaders, broadcast in full on Friday, October 10, 2025, "There are some brothers with good intentions who are asking us to open the borders with Morocco to resolve the Sahara issue. The borders were not closed because of the Sahara issue, but they were closed for other reasons. 63 years of independence, our borders have been closed for more than 45 years."

This coincided with a change in the tone of political discourse in Algeria and its tendency towards appeasement, as Tebboune confirmed that he had received requests from those he described as "brothers" regarding the crisis between Algeria and Morocco, which included a request from Morocco to open the borders between the two countries, which would help resolve the conflict in the Sahara.

As for the striking thing in Witkoff's statement, it is his complete disregard and ignoring of the Polisario Front, and limiting the problem between Morocco and Algeria, in an indication of the possibility that the Trump administration has abandoned the Polisario card and has begun to rely on the economic and commercial deals strategy of the capitalist Trump in breaking down doors and uprooting locks to penetrate the two regimes directly without the Polisario tool.

As for Algeria and Morocco's involvement in the Trump deal, it is motivated by securing the continuation of the two regimes that are agents of Britain in particular, and their willingness to pay the exorbitant price in the hope of a false guarantee of security from American colonial domination over the region.

Trump's recognition of the Moroccanness of the Sahara and the disastrous results that followed were devastating for Morocco, and among its consequences:

- Enabling malicious American capitalism to exploit the resources of the Sahara, especially its rare strategic minerals

- Penetrating the country's agricultural sector through hybrid agriculture, genetically modified seeds, feed, and livestock by American capitalist monopolies, and seizing the rare fruits in Morocco such as prickly pears and argan trees and monopolizing them in the manufacture of cosmetics, in addition to the marine hunting farms project and monopolizing some marine products, in addition to other disasters.

- The most dangerous thing is America planting its colonial military leadership for Africa (Africom) in the heart of Morocco, and it is putting the finishing touches on transferring it to Morocco. The Hespress website (the regime's mouthpiece) stated that Morocco "nominated several cities to host it, such as Laayoune, Dakhla, Boujdour and Agadir, but the Americans showed a tendency to choose Kenitra or Ksar El Kebir, for historical, technical and logistical reasons, including the presence of a former American air base in Kenitra, and their desire to expand its runways to receive huge military aircraft that require special equipment."

The American military command for Africa will be the largest base for the American colonizer in the west of the Islamic world and in the heart of Morocco, and with it America will only accept complete loyalty and servitude to it, which means that the country is above a colonial volcano that will not take long to explode!

More shameful than that is normalization with the usurping Jewish entity and the political, economic and cultural Zionism that followed, and collusion and support for the genocide of Gaza.

As for the regime in Algeria, with the arrival of the American colonizer to the eastern and southern borders of Algeria, through the Sahel countries in the south, which America seized from the French colonizer, and then its penetration into Libya through its agent Haftar, the regime was placed between the jaws of American colonial pincers, which facilitated its blackmail and involvement in the Trump colonial deal.

Trump's America and its treacherous peace, after it seems that it threw the Polisario Front into the basket of its consumed tools and dropped it from its calculations, wants the Sahara as plunder for its companies, a base for its armies, a gateway to Africa to colonize it, and a penetration of all the Maghreb countries, and it brings the regimes of treason and shame in Morocco and Algeria as shameful witnesses to its malicious deal!

It is our ongoing tragedy as long as these regimes remain agents of colonialism, they were only regimes of harm and their rulers are agents who are custodians of the idols and deities of colonialism.

By: Professor Munaji Muhammad

Source: Al-Raya Newspaper