Zionist Expansion Dreams
A Myth Shattered on the Rock of Gaza and the West Bank
If the Jewish entity has not been able to control the West Bank, which does not exceed 5,800 km2 and is inhabited by more than 3 million people, except with the help of the Palestine Liberation Organization, how can it imagine controlling an area of 3,000,000 km2?
And if Gaza, which does not exceed 365 km2, has stood firm for more than two years, even though the entity threw in all its strength and used all the weapons and ammunition, both prohibited and criminalized, that Western countries possess, and lost thousands of its strongest, most violent, dynamic, and bloody soldiers in the world, between dead, wounded, disabled, and mentally ill..., and it possesses technology that the armies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization do not possess, and lost all the advantages it had in terms of intelligence superiority, deterrence, the longest arm, and the ability to reach any spot it wants, and despite all the systematic killing and planned destruction in Gaza, and failed to achieve its goals, which were given deadline after deadline in order to achieve them... does this slogan of expansion still have any meaning or concept?
How can the Jewish entity declare expansion on land inhabited by more than one hundred million people, most of whom are trained in weapons and possess weapons that the entity does not possess?
Is this expansionist declaration to instill terror and shock in regimes and peoples so that they surrender to its will and give it blind loyalty and obedience, so that the region becomes its theater of operations as it does in the West Bank, and the goal is not control and military occupation?
Let us analyze, understand, and answer these questions and the extent of the Jewish entity's possibilities for expansion from the Nile to the Euphrates and the reality of that on the ground:
First: Why is the entity building the apartheid wall if it wants to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates?
The answer to this question reveals a contradiction between ideological slogans and political and security reality.
The expansionist slogan "From the Nile to the Euphrates" is an old Torah/Zionist slogan that was used to mobilize early Zionist movements, and its purpose is to give a religious and "predestined" character to the settlement project and encourage Jews to immigrate to the land of Palestine to achieve (the divine promise)! As for the separation wall, it was built in 2002 during the era of Sharon after the escalation of commando operations during the Al-Aqsa Intifada, and it is a practical acknowledgment of the security inability to fully control even the West Bank, let alone lands further away.
The wall is a defensive fortification, not reflecting strength, but fear of penetration even from a relatively defenseless besieged people in areas such as Jenin, Nablus, and Hebron.
The wall exposes the fact that the entity does not even have the ability to "fully annex" the West Bank, despite its geographic proximity and military superiority, so what about huge expansions from the Nile to the Euphrates?
Second: Is the dream of expansion consistent with the inability to subdue the West Bank?
The West Bank, which does not exceed 5,800 km2 in area, and its population is about 3 million Palestinians, and despite that, the Jewish entity is unable to impose full control over it, even with the help of the Oslo Authority, without almost daily confrontations.
In every city, there are armed resistance cells, and a security infrastructure for the factions, despite the repression and security coordination.
This failure shows that the idea of expanding into vast areas containing peoples and countries such as Iraq, Syria, and Egypt is an illusion that is not practically achievable.
Third: Is the one who is incapable of Gaza capable of ruling 3 million km2?
Gaza has exposed the Jewish entity on multiple levels:
• Gaza area: 365 km2 only.
• Nevertheless, since 2007 until today, all the entity's attempts to subdue it have failed.
• The last war (2023-2025) revealed the collapse of the myth of deterrence, the long arm, and the preemptive strike that it was characterized by, and confirmed that military force alone does not resolve battles with peoples who believe in liberation and resistance.
• The Jewish entity's human, material and psychological losses exceeded all estimates, and embarrassed even its supporters in the West.
If Gaza is enough to humiliate a nuclear army, how will things be if it enters into a direct confrontation in larger areas such as Iraq or Syria?
Fourth: (From the Nile to the Euphrates) a slogan or a project?
From a realistic point of view: The Jewish entity knows that this project is not achievable militarily or politically, but it is used:
• An internal ideological propaganda tool (for the extreme right).
• A justification for creeping settlement, especially in the West Bank.
• An argument for dismantling the surrounding Arab countries by supporting chaos and divisions (as happened in Iraq and Syria).
But the actual project today for the Jewish entity is:
A pure Jewish state as much as possible, on the largest possible area, with the fewest number of Palestinians.
This explains:
• The continuation of expulsion and displacement in Jerusalem and the West Bank.
• Attempts to permanently separate Gaza, the continuity of its war there, and the call to occupy it and make it an investment area with American participation.
• Passing transfer projects and alternative residents (especially in the Negev and the West Bank).
Fifth: The geopolitical reality does not allow the Jewish entity an imperial project
America (the most powerful country in history) was unable to impose its control over Iraq or Afghanistan despite the difference in the balance of power. The Jewish entity is a small entity:
• Area 22,000 km2.
• Population: 9 million (almost half of whom are non-Jews).
• Internal fragility (social fragmentation, political crises, resistance from within).
It is practically not geographically, demographically, or militarily qualified to carry out any expansion project of this size.
In conclusion: What is called the "expansion project from the Nile to the Euphrates" is:
1. An ideological myth more than a feasible plan.
2. A propaganda tool to justify settlement, aggression, and racial discrimination.
3. Not realistically achievable, neither in terms of strength, capabilities, nor international conditions.
The real question now is: Can this entity even remain within the 1948 borders?
Based on the data of reality, the next challenge is not expansion, but steadfastness in the face of internal collapse factors and escalating resistance.
Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir
Salem Abu Sbeitan