Recognizing the State of Palestine: A New Sykes-Picot Agreement
The work of the United Nations General Assembly began on the evening of Monday, September 22, 2025, and the issue of recognizing the Palestinian state topped the annual eightieth session of meetings, as Saudi Arabia and France stand behind the initiative and lead it together, amid anticipation of more recognitions of the Palestinian state. France officially recognized the State of Palestine, becoming the latest country to join the group of countries that have taken this step. The presidency of the Two-State Solution Conference also affirmed the importance of the "New York Declaration," which received exceptional support from the General Assembly, and considered it a preliminary and realistic alternative to ending the repeated violence and wars. It called on all countries to accelerate its implementation through practical steps, while emphasizing that ending the war in Gaza, ensuring the release of all hostages, and exchanging prisoners remain among its top priorities. France and Saudi Arabia hosted a one-day summit focused on two-state solution plans for the ongoing conflict, and Germany, Italy, and the United States, from the G7 countries, did not participate in the summit. Macron called for the establishment of a transitional administration in Gaza that includes the Palestinian Authority, whose mission would be to oversee the dismantling of Hamas. Recognitions of the Palestinian state continue to pour in at the Two-State Solution Conference, with at least 151 of the 193 UN member states now recognizing the State of Palestine (according to a count by Agence France-Presse).
There is no doubt that the two-state solution to the Palestine issue has been an American colonial solution since a long time ago, and is not new today, when the United Nations, under the influence of America, decided to establish a small state for Jews in Palestine, as Resolution 181 was issued on November 29, 1947, which stipulated the division of Palestine into two states. This solution emerges from time to time to divert international attention from the role that colonial countries play in supporting the Jewish entity and working to consolidate it, and to show themselves hypocritically and falsely as peacemakers, which is far from the truth. In this case, the calls of the colonial powers to recognize a Palestinian state are only an attempt to absorb and divert attention from the local and international anger about their continued complicity in the genocide of the people of Gaza, by supplying the occupation with weapons and military equipment, which makes it a diplomatic play that does not change anything on the ground.
The current movement in the Palestine issue has been preceded by an international movement on the most important axes of the future strategy of the Jews after the completion of Lebanon, so that that strategy will focus on dividing Iraq into three states on a sectarian basis; into Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds, and after Lebanon and Iraq comes Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Syria, the Arab Maghreb, Iran, Turkey, Somalia and Pakistan, according to the Oded Yinon Plan 1982 - which is considered the mastermind of many of the Likud Party's strategies in the Jewish entity - under what is called (Lebanonization of the Islamic World). In 2014, Barag Khanna came to state in the Olive Translations series, which is published by the Olive Tree Center for Studies and Consultations, that the division of South Sudan is just the beginning, and that the world may soon witness 300 independent sovereign states. That statement was the result of the circulation of the term Greater Middle East in the political arena for the first time by the Jewish entity, on the tongue of Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, in June 2006, which reflected two basic aspects; The first is that the time has come to carry out a comprehensive change process in the Middle East region, which was described as a difficult surgical operation, the implication of which is to divide what was divided in 1916, which is what has become known as a new Sykes-Picot agreement. The second is that redrawing the map of the Middle East will be the key to achieving what is believed to be political and social stability that guarantees American economic interests in the region, foremost of which is oil.
In order to stop the projects of the infidel West in the lands of the Muslims and its tampering, it is necessary to work to overthrow the cartoon thrones of the rulers in the lands of the Muslims, which are considered the guarantor of the West in the lack of unity of the nation in land and thought, and to move the armies stationed in their barracks to do what their religion and faith have assigned them, which is jihad in the path of their Lord until they achieve their mission in their worldly life. Although jihad initially is a communal obligation, if some Muslims establish it, it falls from the rest, and it is required in cases as if the infidel occupied an Islamic country, but it is not permissible to suspend it in any way, so the legal ruling on jihad is that it is obligatory on the nation, and the nation has the strength that is required and more, and not leaving Gaza fighting alone is nothing but abandonment and failure to carry out the legal ruling in its entirety. If the people of Gaza have fulfilled their obligation and exhausted their efforts, then the sin is hanging on the necks of all Muslims, and it will not be lifted until the killing, hunger, and displacement are lifted from them, but even until all of Palestine is liberated from the Jews, and it returns as it was an integral part of the lands of the Muslims under the banner of Islam and its state.
Whatever is said about the ominous Sykes-Picot Agreement and its repercussions on the lands of Islam and on Muslims, the European infidels had prepared themselves to divide the inheritance in a way that guarantees the extension of control and the consolidation of influence over the heart of the Islamic countries. The agreement must also be viewed as a dangerous turning point in the life of the Islamic nation, linked to the tragedy of the demise of the Muslim state, and a station that paved the way for the establishment of a new world order after the end of World War I in the absence of the Caliphate, i.e. in the absence of Muslims from the international arena.
In conclusion, we say: Has the time not come to bury the Sykes-Picot Agreement and its repercussions forever, but rather to prevent any alternative other than the establishment of the Second Rightly Guided Caliphate on the method of Prophethood?!
Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir
Abdullah al-Qadi - Wilayah of Yemen