The civil state is a tyrant that failed to establish justice in its own home, so how can it succeed in our home?!
The civil state is a tyrant that failed to establish justice in its own home, so how can it succeed in our home?!

The Sudanese Prime Minister, Kamel Idriss, announced in a press conference the formation of a new government called the "Government of Hope", consisting of 22 ministerial portfolios. In a speech called (historical), he revealed the features of the Government of Hope, which he called a civil government, and said that it is based on a clear vision and firm principles to save Sudan, put it on the path of progress and prosperity, achieve security and well-being, and a decent life for every Sudanese. He specified that the vision is to elevate Sudan to the ranks of developed countries. The values are honesty, trustworthiness, justice, transparency, tolerance, and the approach is scientific, practical, professional, collective, with clear plans and precise standards for success.

0:00 0:00
Speed:
June 29, 2025

The civil state is a tyrant that failed to establish justice in its own home, so how can it succeed in our home?!

The civil state is a tyrant that failed to establish justice in its own home, so how can it succeed in our home?!

The Sudanese Prime Minister, Kamel Idriss, announced in a press conference the formation of a new government called the "Government of Hope", consisting of 22 ministerial portfolios. In a speech called (historical), he revealed the features of the Government of Hope, which he called a civil government, and said that it is based on a clear vision and firm principles to save Sudan, put it on the path of progress and prosperity, achieve security and well-being, and a decent life for every Sudanese. He specified that the vision is to elevate Sudan to the ranks of developed countries. The values are honesty, trustworthiness, justice, transparency, tolerance, and the approach is scientific, practical, professional, collective, with clear plans and precise standards for success. The government will be technocratic without party affiliations, representing the voice of the silent majority, combining asceticism in the manifestations of power with the well-being of the people, and embodying the highest virtues.

The Prime Minister spoke about the desired results of his civil government, mentioning honesty, trustworthiness, justice, and others, and supporting this with Quranic verses. This is a deliberate mixing of disparate concepts to gain supporting public opinion. As for the truth that a conscious ear must understand, it needs details and depth away from emotions and wishes. Politics must be based on facts, away from misrepresentation.

Looking at the Muslim countries, including Sudan, one finds that the existing countries are the result of an agreement between the old colonial powers to divide influence in 1916 AD. They are functional states, made to perform a specific task, and they did not exist except by this agreement. These countries remained subordinate to the Western capitalism that created them, and throughout their existence, they continued to compete for the top spot on the list of failures every year, and they have proven with merit their abject failure on all political, economic, and social levels, no matter how the governments, ministers, and rulers change. So where is the problem? And why is this country rich in its multiple virgin resources and its people live in abject poverty?!

One of the greatest things that Muslims have been tempted with in our time is ideas and concepts related to governance and economics, and perhaps it is the focus of the West in its attack on Islam and in its focus on its political, intellectual, and economic hegemony and control.

The roots of the idea of the civil state go back to ancient times, where Westerners link it to the principles of justice and the rule of law in Greek civilization, through the democratic system of government in Athens, which focused on people's participation in decision-making. Then these concepts developed with the Romans, who laid advanced legal foundations for organizing the affairs of society, which contributed to the formation and crystallization of what is called the idea of the rule of law.

With the development of political thought in the Middle Ages of the infidel West, the civil state was affected by the conflict between the Church and the State in Europe. This conflict led to the strengthening of the principle of separation between religion and politics, especially after the Renaissance and the French Revolution, where calls escalated to establish states based on respect for individual freedoms and equality before the law without the intervention of religion in political affairs. In the modern era, Western countries and their leader, the United States of America, adopted it.

Here, a logical question arises as Muslims, with a different cultural heritage and a history unlike this history, deeply rooted in history, as the Prophet ﷺ; the founder of the State of Islam in Medina, and after him the Rightly Guided Caliphs, then the Umayyad State, the Abbasid State, and then the Ottoman State, all of this is a model of Islamic civilization and its authenticity and for the rule of the Islamic State that cannot be missed.

In order to delve deeper, we must know the principles of the civil state and what corresponds to them in the rule of Islam:

The civil state is based on a set of well-established principles that aim to achieve justice from the perspective of the capitalist West, with the idea of equality and the protection of individual rights. These principles represent the basic pillars of these countries. As for in Islam, sovereignty belongs to Sharia absolutely. God Almighty said: ﴿But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission﴾ And He said: ﴿It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, that they should [thereafter] have any choice about their affair. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has certainly strayed into clear error.﴾ And He said: ﴿Then is it the judgement of [the time of] ignorance they desire? But who is better than Allah in judgement for a people who are certain [in faith].﴾.

These are texts from the Book of God, definitively proven and indicative, and there is no room for denying them. They all converge on one statement clearly, which means that sovereignty belongs to Sharia and not to reason, to God Almighty and not to the people.

They believe in the civil state according to the principle of sovereignty of the people that they have thus ensured the achievement of justice and equality in society, and prevent any abuses or exploitation of power, and thus the rule of law is what makes the government subject to legal rules and imposes mechanisms for holding officials accountable, which strengthens trust between the people and the state, although their reality today is contrary to that and is deeply rooted in the control of businessmen and money over governance and politics, and the general public are merely followers subject to them.

It appears that the rule of "Sovereignty belongs to Sharia" has made the system of government in Islam unique in achieving the beautiful meaning of the rule of law. This meaning that the advocates of the civil state have imagined that they have achieved, while in reality they have made sovereignty theoretically for the majority over the minority (and practically for a small minority of influential capitalists). The majority is the one who makes the law and the one who changes it, so how can the law be its master?! As for Islam, by removing legislation from human desires, it has ensured that the strong does not enslave the weak, nor the rich the weak, but everyone is subject to the law of God Almighty.

This is evident in the system of government, as the Lawgiver established commands and prohibitions in various areas of life and made the authority to implement for the nation (cut off, flog, ...), choosing from among them, by a pledge of allegiance with consent and choice, who implements the Sharia rulings on them.

Also, the civil state gives great importance to the protection of human rights and the guarantee of individual freedoms, and these rights include freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, personal freedom, and freedom of ownership.

The truth is that these ideas, in their true sense, have no currency among Muslims, and the reason for their emergence as words in the Muslim arena is the lack of awareness of their reality and the understanding of their reality as a point of view that contradicts Islam in its entirety, away from misleading propaganda. These ideas have emerged, and the revolutions have taken the lead as slogans expressing the rejection of injustice and the restriction of freedoms that have been practiced on the sons of Muslims by the rulers, agents of the infidel West, and their supporters. However, any Muslim knows that he is bound by the law of God and His commands and prohibitions.

Islam is a creed that requires its complete and general Sharia to regulate all aspects of life without exception. God Almighty said: ﴿This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion﴾.

The Muslims have a project of governance that God revealed and its foundations were laid by His Messenger ﷺ, in the State of Medina, the system of government by which Islam is applied, and justice and fairness prevail, so we return as we were Muslims to the Lord of the Worlds, carrying the torches of guidance instead of imitating the failed capitalists.

Written for the media office radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Ghada Abdel-Jabbar (Um Awab) - Sudan Province

More from null

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Every time we are presented with a "new symbol" with Muslim roots or Eastern features, many Muslims cheer, and hopes are built on an illusion called "political representation" in an infidel system that does not recognize Islam as a ruling system, a creed, or a law.

We all remember the overwhelming joy that swept through the feelings of many when Obama won in 2008. He is the son of Kenya, and he has a Muslim father! Here, some imagined that Islam and Muslims had become close to American influence, but Obama was one of the most harmful presidents to Muslims. He destroyed Libya, contributed to the tragedy of Syria, and ignited Afghanistan and Iraq with his planes and soldiers. Rather, he was the blood shedder in Yemen through his tools, and his era was a continuation of a systematic hostility against the nation.

Today, the scene is repeated, but with new names. Zohran Mamdani is celebrated because he is a Muslim, an immigrant, and a young man, as if he is the savior! But only a few look at his political and intellectual positions. This man is a strong supporter of homosexuals, participates in their activities, and considers their deviation a human right!

What a shame that people pin their hopes on this?! Wasn't it a repetition of the same political and intellectual disappointment that the nation has fallen into time and time again?! Yes, because it is captivated by appearance, not essence! Deceived by smiles, and deals with emotion, not creed, with names, not concepts, and with symbols, not principles!

This fascination with appearances and names is the result of the absence of legitimate political awareness, because Islam is not measured by origin, name, or race, but by commitment to the principle of Islam in its entirety; as a system, creed, and law. A Muslim who does not rule by Islam or support it has no value, but rather submits to the infidel capitalist system and justifies infidelity and deviations in the name of "freedom".

Let all Muslims who rejoiced in his victory and thought that he was a seed of good or the beginning of revival know that revival does not come from within systems of disbelief, nor with their tools, nor through their ballot boxes, nor under the ceiling of their constitutions.

Whoever presents himself through the democratic system, swears to respect its laws, then defends and celebrates homosexuality, and calls for what angers God, is not a supporter of Islam or a hope for the nation, but rather a tool for polishing and diluting, and a false representation that does not advance or delay anything.

The so-called political successes in the West for some personalities with Islamic names are nothing but crumbs presented as painkillers to the nation, to be told: Look, change is possible through our systems.

 So what is the reality of this "representation"?

The West does not open the doors of rule to Islam, but only opens them to those who identify with its values and ideas. Anyone who enters their system must accept their constitution and their man-made laws, and renounce the rule of Islam. If he agrees to that, he becomes an acceptable model, but the true Muslim is rejected by them from his roots.

So who is Zohran Mamdani? And why is this illusion being created?

He is a person who carries a Muslim name but adopts a deviant agenda that is completely contrary to the nature of Islam, from supporting homosexuals and promoting what is called their "rights". He is a living example of how the West makes its models: Muslim in name, secular in reality, a servant of the Western liberal agenda, nothing more. Rather, to distract the nation from its true path. Instead of demanding the state of Islam and the Caliphate, it is preoccupied with parliamentary seats and positions in systems of disbelief! Instead of heading to liberate Palestine, it waits for someone to "defend Gaza" from inside the American Congress or the European Parliament!

The truth of the matter is that this is a distortion of the true path of change, which is the establishment of the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the Prophetic method, which raises the banner of Islam, establishes the law of God, and unites the nation behind one Caliph who is fought from behind and feared.

So do not be deceived by names, and do not rejoice in those who belong to you in form and disagree with you in content, for not everyone who bears the name Saeed, Ali, or Zohran is on the path of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Know that change does not come from within the parliaments of disbelief, but from the armies of the nation that have come to move, and from its conscious youth who work day and night to turn the tables on the West and its aides and its treacherous followers in the lands of Islam and the Muslims.

Muslims will not rise through democratic elections or through Western ballot boxes, but through a real renaissance based on the Islamic creed, by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate that restores Islam's status, Muslims' dignity, and shatters the illusions of democracy.

Do not be deceived by names, and do not pin your hopes on individuals in systems of disbelief, but return to your great project: the resumption of Islamic life, for this alone is the path to glory, victory, and empowerment.

The scene is a humiliating repetition of old tragedies: false symbols, loyalty to Western regimes, and deviation from the path of Islam. Everyone who applauds this path is misleading the nation. Return to the Caliphate project, and do not let the enemies of Islam make your leaders and representatives for you. Glory is not in the seats of democracy, but in the saddle of the Caliphate, for which Hizb ut-Tahrir works and warns the nation against this intellectual and political decline. There is no salvation for us except with the state of the Caliphate, which does not allow Muslims to be ruled by those who profess a religion other than Islam, nor by those who justify deviance and perversion, nor by those who legislate for people other than what God has revealed.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Abdul Mahmoud Al-Ameri - Yemen Province

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality: The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality

The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Al-Ahram Gate reported on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, that the Egyptian Prime Minister, in a speech delivered on behalf of the President at the Second World Summit for Social Development in Doha, Qatar, said that Egypt is implementing a comprehensive approach to eliminate poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including "multidimensional poverty."

For years, official speeches in Egypt have rarely been devoid of phrases such as "a comprehensive approach to eliminating poverty" and "the real launch of the Egyptian economy." Officials repeat these slogans at conferences and events, accompanied by glossy images of investment projects, hotels, and resorts. But the reality, as evidenced by international reports, is quite different. Poverty in Egypt remains a deeply rooted, and even worsening, phenomenon, despite repeated government promises of improvement and renaissance.

According to reports by UNICEF, ESCWA, and the World Food Programme for 2024 and 2025, about one in five Egyptians lives in multidimensional poverty, meaning they are deprived of more than one aspect of basic life, such as education, health, housing, work, and services. The data also confirms that more than 49% of families suffer from difficulties in obtaining sufficient food, a shocking figure that reflects the depth of the living crisis.

As for financial poverty, i.e., low income compared to the costs of living, it has risen sharply as a result of successive waves of inflation that have eroded people's wages, efforts, and savings, until a large percentage of Egyptians are below the financial poverty line despite their constant work.

While the government talks about initiatives such as "Takaful and Karama" and "Decent Life," international figures reveal that these programs have not radically changed the structure of poverty, but have been limited to temporary palliatives similar to a drop poured into the desert. The Egyptian countryside, where more than half of the population lives, still suffers from poor services, a lack of decent job opportunities, and dilapidated infrastructure. The ESCWA report confirms that deprivation in the countryside is several times greater than in the cities, which indicates poor distribution of wealth and chronic neglect of the peripheries.

When the Prime Minister thanks the citizen "who has endured with the government the measures of economic reform," he is in fact acknowledging the existence of real suffering resulting from these policies. However, this acknowledgment is not followed by a change in approach, but rather a continuation on the same capitalist path that caused the crisis.

The alleged reform that began in 2016 with the "floatation" program, raising subsidies, and increasing taxes, was not a reform but rather a burdening of the poor with the cost of debts and deficits. At a time when officials are talking about "the launch," huge investments are going to luxury real estate and tourism projects that serve the owners of capital, while millions of young people find no opportunities for work or housing. Indeed, many of these projects, such as the Alam El Roum area in Matrouh, whose investments are estimated at $29 billion, are foreign capitalist partnerships that acquire land and wealth and turn them into a source of profit for investors, not a source of livelihood for the people.

The regime fails not only because it is corrupt, but because it follows a false intellectual basis, which is the capitalist system, which makes money the focus of all state policies. Capitalism is based on absolute freedom of ownership, and allows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few who own the means of production, while the many bear the burden of taxes, prices, and public debt.

Therefore, all so-called "social protection programs" are merely an attempt to beautify the brutal face of capitalism, and to prolong the life of an unjust system that takes into account the rich and collects from the poor. Instead of addressing the root of the disease; i.e., the monopoly of wealth and the dependence of the economy on international institutions, it is sufficient to distribute crumbs of cash aid, which do not alleviate poverty or preserve dignity.

Care is not a favor from the ruler to the ruled, but a legitimate duty, and a responsibility for which God will hold him accountable in this world and the hereafter. What is happening today is a deliberate neglect of people's affairs, and an abandonment of the duty of care in favor of conditional loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The state has become an intermediary between the poor and the foreign creditor, imposing taxes, reducing subsidies, and selling public property to cover a swollen deficit created by the capitalist system itself. In all of this, the legitimate concepts that regulate the economy are absent, such as the prohibition of usury, the prevention of the ownership of public wealth by individuals, and the obligation to spend on the people from the treasury of the Muslims.

Islam has presented an integrated economic system that addresses poverty at its roots, not just with cash support or cosmetic projects. This system is based on fixed legitimate foundations, the most prominent of which are:

1- Prohibiting usury and usurious debts that shackle the state and drain its resources. By eliminating usury, the dependence of the economy on international institutions will disappear, and the financial sovereignty of the nation will be restored.

2- Making ownership three types:

Individual ownership: such as houses, shops, and private farms...

Public ownership: includes major wealth such as oil, gas, minerals, and water...

State ownership: such as fay' lands, rikaz, and kharaj...

With this distribution, justice is achieved, as a small group is prevented from monopolizing the nation's resources.

3- Guaranteeing sufficiency for every individual of the people: The state guarantees for every person in its care their basic needs of food, clothing, and housing. If they are unable to work, the treasury must spend on them.

4- Zakat and mandatory spending: Zakat is not a charity, but an obligation, collected by the state and spent in its legitimate channels for the poor, the needy, and the debtors. It is an effective distribution tool that returns money to the cycle of life in society.

Along with stimulating productive work and preventing exploitation, and urging investment of resources in real beneficial projects such as heavy and military industries, not in speculation, luxury real estate and fictitious projects. In addition to adjusting prices with real supply and demand, not with monopoly or floatation.

The Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood is the only one capable of applying these provisions practically, because it is built on the basis of Islamic creed, and its goal is to care for people's affairs, not to collect their money. Under the Khilafah, there is no usury or conditional loans, and no sale of public wealth to foreigners, but resources are managed in a way that achieves the interest of the nation, and the treasury finances health care, education, and public facilities from state resources, kharaj, anfal, and public property.

As for the poor, their basic needs are guaranteed individually, not through temporary charity but as a guaranteed legitimate right. Therefore, fighting poverty in Islam is not a political slogan, but an integrated system of life that establishes justice, prevents injustice, and returns wealth to its people.

Between the official discourse and the lived reality is a huge distance that is not hidden from anyone. While the government boasts of its "giant" projects and the "real launch," millions of Egyptians live below the poverty line, suffering from high prices, unemployment, and a lack of hope. The truth is that this suffering will not disappear as long as Egypt continues on the path of capitalism, surrendering its economy to usurers and submitting to the policies of international institutions.

The crises and problems of Egypt are human problems and not material ones, and they relate to legitimate rulings that show how to deal with them and treat them on the basis of Islam, and the solutions are easier than turning a blind eye, but they need a sincere administration that has a free will that wants to walk in the right path and truly wants good for Egypt and its people, and then this administration must review all the contracts that were previously concluded and that are concluded with all the companies that monopolize the assets of the country and what is of its public ownership, and at the forefront are companies exploring for gas, oil, gold and the rest of the minerals and wealth, and expel all those companies because they are originally colonial companies plundering the wealth of the country, then formulate a new covenant based on enabling people to access the country's wealth and establishing or leasing companies that are based on producing wealth from the sources of oil, gas, gold and other minerals and redistribute these wealth to the people again, then people will be able to cultivate the dead land that the state will enable them to exploit with their right in it, and they will also be able to manufacture what must be manufactured to raise the economy of Egypt and suffice its people, and the state will support them in this way, and all this is not a figment of the imagination or impossible to happen or a project that we present for experimentation that may succeed or fail, but it is legitimate rulings that are necessary and binding on the state and the people, so the state may not give up the wealth of the country that is owned by the people under the pretext of contracts approved and supported by unjust international laws, and it may not prevent people from it, but it must cut off every hand that extends plundering to the wealth of the people, this is what Islam offers and must be implemented, but it is not applied in isolation from the rest of the systems of Islam, but it is only applied through the Rashidun Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood, this state whose concern and call for is carried by Hizb ut-Tahrir and calls on Egypt and its people, people and army, to work with it for its sake, may God write the conquest from Him, so we see it a reality that honors Islam and its people, O God, sooner rather than later.

﴿If the people of the towns had but believed and been righteous, We would have opened for them blessings from heaven and earth.﴾

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saeed Fadl

Member of the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Egypt