2025-10-30
The Radar: America's Plotting in Sudan by Professor Hatem Al-Attar
First: The current conflict in Sudan
Since the outbreak of the December 2018 revolution, Sudanese public opinion has been directed through the media and intelligence towards two options with no third: either a democratic civilian government or a military government. This direction was not innocent, but rather part of a pre-preparation for an internal war that serves an international project aimed at tearing Sudan apart, as stated by Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, Chairman of the Sovereignty Council, on June 27, 2023, saying: "Our country is exposed to a conspiracy whose motives are to tear apart the unity of the country."
The American strategy towards Sudan is not isolated from its policy in East and Central Africa, but rather Sudan is considered the gateway to the continent rich in resources, as stated by the US Special Envoy to Sudan, Scott Gration, and confirmed by US President Trump, saying that Sudan is among the priorities of US foreign policy.
Second: The Goal of Dismemberment
Sudan represents a strategic threat to America's interests in Africa, not only because of its location and wealth, but because of its people's adherence to Islam, their deep connection to the Holy Quran, the Khalawi, and their love for the Prophet ﷺ.
Despite the absence of a state that applies Islam practically, America and Europe fear that Sudan will become a base for launching a real Islamic project, so they seek to completely secularize Sudan and dismantle its Islamic moral values.
Third: Sudan's Wealth
As Napoleon said: "When you hear about sedition, look for the economy."
Sudan is an exceptionally rich country:
– Area before the secession of the South: one million square miles (2.5 million km2)
– Oil production: 300 thousand barrels per day, with reserves exceeding 3 billion barrels
– Gold: the third largest global producer, with estimated reserves of 1,550 tons
– Agriculture: 200 million acres of arable land, of which 64 million are exploited
– Pastures: 115 million acres
– Gum arabic: Sudan produces 80% of global production, and American companies monopolize it
– Uranium: Sudan is considered one of the richest countries in it
Fourth: Tools of Dismemberment
America uses five main tools to dismember Sudan:
1- The Sudanese government
2- Armed rebel movements
3- The political opposition
4- The small state of South Sudan
5- International and regional organizations
But the most dangerous tool is the military and security leadership, which represents the centers of power in Sudan: the army, the Rapid Support Forces, the security apparatus, and the police.
America has relied on these leaders since the era of Al-Bashir until the period of Al-Burhan, to implement its plan.
The interest of Sudanese leaders in implementing America's plan
The interest of some Sudanese leaders in enabling the implementation of America's criminal plan to tear the country apart is evident through their direct connection to American and Western support, which is the only guarantee for them to continue in power.
– Some of them believe that their continued stay in power is linked to external support, not to the extent of their legitimacy (nationalism) or the people's love for them.
– They rely on the political, financial, and military protection provided by America and Western countries, which makes them pay the price for this by implementing agendas that re-fragment Sudan and dismantle its institutions.
– Putting their personal interests above all else, as this support keeps them away from internal accountability.
– They use tribal and ethnic conflicts as a means to keep the people of the country preoccupied and scattered, which ensures that they remain as controlling forces and does not allow any real opposition to expand.
– These leaders do not want to build a strong unified country, but rather prefer division so that they remain the strong ones controlling parts of the state.
– The United States and its tools consider them the only guarantee for the stability of its interests in the region, so it provides them with political cover and protection in exchange for implementing its plan in Sudan.
Fifth: The Kick-Off - The Naivasha Agreement
The Al-Bashir regime signed the Naivasha Agreement in 2005, which led to the secession of the South and broke the back of Sudan militarily and politically. Al-Bashir admitted in a cabinet meeting on September 30, 2010, saying: “We put the unity of the country at risk in exchange for achieving peace through the secession of the South.”
The most dangerous clauses of the agreement were the dismantling of the Sudanese army, the consecration of tribalism and regionalism, and the arming of tribal groups against each other, which led to waterfalls of blood in Darfur, Kordofan, the Blue Nile, and now Khartoum.
Sixth: Obstacles to Dismemberment - The British-American Conflict
Although the two parties of colonialism agree on dismembering Sudan, they differ in dividing its wealth; The conflict between Britain and America over Sudan continues, and each party seeks to empower its tools from politicians and armed militias.
After the December Revolution, power was transferred to the Military Council through the Security Committee, and the first steps of the partnership with the Forces of Freedom and Change began. America seeks to expel British influence through a fake partnership that is capable of overthrowing it at any moment, and indeed the ongoing war in Sudan is the newest scenario of international conflict.
Sudan cannot be stable under the current complex conditions except by expelling colonialism in all its forms and the army adopting the nation's project, the project of the Second Rightly Guided Caliphate based on the method of Prophethood, which alone is capable of eradicating the influence of America and the West, which is greedy for our country and plundering our wealth, and which makes us live a life of division, chaos, hunger, backwardness and disease.
Source: The Radar
