الصراع في اليمن بين أذناب بريطانيا وأتباع أمريكا إلى أين وصل؟  الجزء الأول (1)
July 03, 2019

الصراع في اليمن بين أذناب بريطانيا وأتباع أمريكا إلى أين وصل؟ الجزء الأول (1)

الصراع في اليمن بين أذناب بريطانيا وأتباع أمريكا إلى أين وصل؟

الجزء الأول (1)

إن دول الاستعمار لا يهمها إلا مصالحها فهي تتحرك بناء على هذه المصالح فكان من الطبيعي أن تغزو العالم وتزرع عملاء مرتزقة من أهل البلاد ليكونوا خدماً لها مقابل بقائهم في السلطة وهي تسندهم حتى إذا انتهى دورهم بحثت عن البديل ورمتهم في قارعة الطريق إما قتيل أو سجين أو شريد مهين...

اليمن هي إحدى الدويلات في بلاد المسلمين التي يحكمها عملاء للغرب، وهؤلاء الحكام يستمدون قوتهم من الغرب الكافر وليس من الأمة فهم موظفون وليسوا حكاماً.

احتلت بريطانيا عدن عام 1839م وخرجت منها بجيشها في 1967م وكان سبب خروجها هو الرأي العام الذي أوجدته أمريكا والاتحاد السوفيتي حول الاستعمار القديم وإعطاء الشعوب الاستقلال، إضافة إلى قيام أمريكا بتحريك رجالها مثل عبد الناصر الذي قام بتحريك جيش مصر في دعم الثورات ضد المستعمر القديم بريطانيا وفرنسا، ولكن بريطانيا لم تخرج من جنوب اليمن مكتوفة الأيدي بل سلمت الحكم للجبهة القومية الموالية لها، وتركت جيشاً من العملاء في الشمال والجنوب سياسيين ورجال مال وأعمال ومفكرين وفعاليات مؤثرة.

ظلت أمريكا تحاول أخذ اليمن حيث حاولت في الجنوب بعد 1963م عن طريق جبهة التحرير ففشلت، ثم استمالت في السبعينات الرئيس سالم رُبيع ولكن الإنجليز قتلوه، وفي الثمانينات استمالت الرئيس علي ناصر فحدثت حرب في 1986م بينه وبين رجال الإنجليز فخرج من عدن طريدا واستقر به المقام في سوريا أيام الهالك حافظ أسد عميل أمريكا، أما في الشمال بعد ثورة 1962م التي ساندها عبد الناصر ضد المملكة المتوكلية دخلت القوات المصرية وكان أول رئيس تحت رعايتهم عبد الله السلال، وفي بداية السبعينات استولى إبراهيم الحمدي على الحكم وكان من رجال أمريكا فاغتاله رجال الإنجليز، ثم في 1994م استمالت عميل الإنجليز علي سالم البيض الذي كان رئيس الشطر الجنوبي ولكن بعد الوحدة بين الشطرين 1990م تحت رعاية الإنجليز أصبح نائب الرئيس علي صالح، حيث أوعزت له أمريكا إعلان الانفصال وفك الارتباط خصوصا عندما بدأت العلاقة تسوء بينه وبين علي صالح بسبب أن صالح كان يقصي جناح علي سالم، فنشبت الحرب بينهما وانتهت بهزيمة علي سالم وسيطرة الماكر صالح على اليمن. وأنجح محاولاتها عن طريق حركة الحوثيين، فقد كانت ثورة شباط/فبراير 2011م فرصة كبيرة لظهور الحركة في ساحات التغيير فظهروا بقوة، ومن ثم دعمتهم أمريكا عن طريق المبعوث الأممي جمال بن عمر، فدخلوا مؤتمر الحوار الوطني وحصلوا على تمثيل يفوق حجمهم الحقيقي، وقبل توقيعهم على مخرجات الحوار انقلبوا عليه لأن المخرجات لم تعط أمريكا مرادها، مع العلم أن مخرجات الحوار هي مخرجات علمانية سافرة فضحت كل من شارك فيها وخصوصا أصحاب العمائم واللحى، ولكن الحوثي لم ينقلب على المخرجات من منطلق شرعي بل من منطلق مصلحي وإلا فهو شارك في كل اللجان التي صاغت هذه المخرجات المتهافتة، وفي أيلول/سبتمبر 2014م دخل الحوثيون صنعاء، عندها قسم الإنجليز أذنابهم إلى فريقين علي صالح وجزء من حزب المؤتمر ينخرط مع الحوثيين، والفريق الثاني عبد ربه منصور هادي والبقية الباقية من حزب المؤتمر إضافة إلى حزب الإصلاح، وأثناء هذا تم توقيع اتفاق السلم والشراكة بين الفرقاء عملاء الإنجليز وعملاء الأمريكان، ولم تلتزم به جماعة الحوثي، كل هذا ما كان ليحدث لولا:

1-    دعم أمريكا الكبير للحوثيين وقد ازداد تأثير أمريكا في اليمن بعد هلاك عبد الله بن عبد العزيز العميل الإنجليزي وصعود عميل أمريكا سلمان بن عبد العزيز في السعودية.

2-    ضعف الإنجليز دولياً أمام أمريكا، وانعكس هذا الضعف على عملائهم في البلد بالذات المؤتمر والإصلاح، بالرغم من كثرتهم ولكنهم كانوا أمام الحوثي أذلاء صاغرين أقزاما، سربلتهم العمالة بالخزي والعار، يعملون من تحت الطاولة.

ثم زادت قوة الحوثي بعد 2015/3/26م عندما بدأت عاصفة الحزم التي ضربت عملاء الإنجليز وحولت الحوثي من معتدٍ على الدولة ومؤسساتها في نظر الناس إلى معتدًى عليه، التف الناس حوله باسم الدفاع عن الوطن...

هذه المقدمة كان لا بد منها حتى تتضح الصورة، وسوف نتحدث على مراكز القوى المؤثرة في البلد ومن هي الجهة التي لها اليد الطولى فيها الآن:

أولاً: الجيش:

ظل الجيش تحت سيطرة ونفوذ رجال الإنجليز ولم يستطع الأمريكان اختراقه، وقد عمد الأمريكان إلى محاولات عن طريق عمل تأهيل للجيش بالدورات العسكرية ثم عمدوا إلى تأسيس ودعم إنشاء جهاز الأمن القومي في عام 2002م ودعم قوات مكافحة (الإرهاب)، وكانت تواجه هذه الأعمال بمكر من رجال الإنجليز الذين كان يرميهم علي صالح ليظهروا الولاء للأمريكان وهم في حقيقتهم إنجليز، حدث تصدع وخلاف بين رجال الإنجليز بعد 2006م حيث بدأ علي صالح الرئيس في ذلك الوقت بتهيئة الأجواء لجعل ابنه أحمد خليفة له، فجن جنون علي محسن الأحمر والشيخ حميد الأحمر، وعلي محسن من أخبث رجال الإنجليز وله تأثير على مشايخ القبائل وإضافة إلى أنه محسوب على حزب الإصلاح، وكان يشغل قائد الفرقة الأولى مدرع والمكون من 23 لواءً، وتعتبر القوة الثانية بعد قوات الحرس الجمهوري، حيث كان علي محسن يطمع أن يتولى الحكم بعد علي صالح وهذا الذي أدى إلى وجود خلاف بينهم، عمل علي صالح على تقوية قوات الحرس الجمهوري التي يقودها نجله أحمد علي صالح المكونة من 17 لواء، وعمل على إضعاف الفرقة الأولى مدرع حيث أشركها بالحروب مع الحوثي من 2004م إلى 2010 على فترات متقطعة.

وسوف نلخص الحالة التي وصل لها الجيش:

1-    الخلافات بين رجال الإنجليز في وسط الجيش أدى إلى إضعافه وسهولة اختراقه أو تفكيكه، وكان السبب الرئيسي في هذه الخلافات هي الأطماع اللامحدودة للهالك علي صالح رجل الإنجليز الماكر.

2-    هيكلة الجيش حيث حرصت أمريكا على أخذ هذا الملف لغرض اختراقه وإضعاف نفوذ الإنجليز، ثم عملت على تشتيت القوات وتغير مسمياتها ودمجها، ولم تنجح في إبعاد نفوذ الإنجليز ولكن أضعفته نوعا ما وذلك بإبعاد القيادات السابقة المرتبطة ارتباط ولاءٍ ونسب برجل الإنجليز علي صالح.

3-    دخول الحوثيين صنعاء وتحالف علي صالح معهم، حيث مكنهم من دخول المعسكرات فنهبوا السلاح وحملوا الكثير منه إلى معقلهم صعدة، وقد كان يخيل إليه أنه بإشارة منه سوف يعيد السلاح. وصل الرجل إلى مرحلة من الثقة المفرطة بنفسه والتي أوقعته جثة هامدة بين أيديهم.

4-    عاصفة الحزم حيث ركزت على تدمير معسكرات الحرس الجمهوري التابعة لعلي صالح، وأيضا استهداف قادة الحرس وخصوصا عندما ضربت القاعة الكبرى التي كان فيها عزاء، وقتل فيها قرابة 500 شخص كان معظمهم من حزب المؤتمر وقادة الجيش من الصف الأول والذي كان علي صالح يدير البلد بهم.

5-    تفرق الجيش القسم الأول ظل تحت سلطة الحوثي الظالم وانخرط معه في القتال ضد التحالف واقتنع بأفكار الحوثي بسبب الدورات الثقافية المركزة التي تقوم بها الحركة الحوثية، والبعض قاتل مع الحوثي ليس قناعة ولكن لغرض الحصول على أموال خصوصا بعد توقف صرف الرواتب وهؤلاء يمكن تصنيفهم أنهم ليسوا مضموني الولاء للحوثي. والقسم الثاني من الجيش ذهب ليقاتل مع التحالف المجرم منهم من ذهب مع علي محسن في مأرب وما حولها وهؤلاء أغلبهم من الفرقة الأولى مدرع أو من حزب الإصلاح وهؤلاء لا زالوا إنجليز، والبعض ذهب للقتال في الشريط الحدودي مع مملكة آل سعود والدعم والتسليح مباشر عن طريق أمراء آل سعود وهؤلاء سوف يتم استقطاب جزء منهم للعمل مع الأمريكان عن طريق آل سعود، والجزء الأخير من هذا القسم ذهب للقتال مع الشق الآخر للتحالف مع الإمارات وانضم لقوات طارق صالح في الحديدة وهؤلاء تحت مظلة الإنجليز. والقسم الرابع والأخير هم المخلصون الذين أدركوا أن هذه الحرب لا تخدم الإسلام ولا المسلمين وأن أدوات الصراع عملاء للغرب الكافر.

هذا هو واقع الجيش في اليمن، ومن خلال النقاط أعلاه يلاحظ ضعف نفوذ الإنجليز على المستوى الذي كان عليه من قبل، وقوي فيه نفوذ الأمريكان ولكن لم يصل إلى مستوى قوة الإنجليز بعد ولكنه في تقدم مستمر، ولوحظ أن الجيش هو الأداة الفاعلة في الصراع، وسوف نظل ندعوهم إلى التوقف عن تنفيذ مخططات الغرب والعمل لنصرة دينهم، فإلى متى يظلون ينفذون إما مخططات أمريكا أو مخططات الإنجليز؟! حري بهم أن يدركوا ويعوا على هذا الصراع الذي قتل أبناءهم وجوّع أهليهم وأغضب ربهم وجعلهم يعيشون حياة ضنكا، فإلى العمل لنصرة العاملين المخلصين لإقامة دولة الخلافة الراشدة الثانية على منهاج النبوة التي يعمل لها حزب التحرير.

يتبع الجزء الثاني...

كتبه للمكتب الإعلامي المركزي لحزب التحرير

عبد الهادي حيدر – ولاية اليمن

الجزء الثاني (2)

الجزء الثالث (3)

More from null

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Every time we are presented with a "new symbol" with Muslim roots or Eastern features, many Muslims cheer, and hopes are built on an illusion called "political representation" in an infidel system that does not recognize Islam as a ruling system, a creed, or a law.

We all remember the overwhelming joy that swept through the feelings of many when Obama won in 2008. He is the son of Kenya, and he has a Muslim father! Here, some imagined that Islam and Muslims had become close to American influence, but Obama was one of the most harmful presidents to Muslims. He destroyed Libya, contributed to the tragedy of Syria, and ignited Afghanistan and Iraq with his planes and soldiers. Rather, he was the blood shedder in Yemen through his tools, and his era was a continuation of a systematic hostility against the nation.

Today, the scene is repeated, but with new names. Zohran Mamdani is celebrated because he is a Muslim, an immigrant, and a young man, as if he is the savior! But only a few look at his political and intellectual positions. This man is a strong supporter of homosexuals, participates in their activities, and considers their deviation a human right!

What a shame that people pin their hopes on this?! Wasn't it a repetition of the same political and intellectual disappointment that the nation has fallen into time and time again?! Yes, because it is captivated by appearance, not essence! Deceived by smiles, and deals with emotion, not creed, with names, not concepts, and with symbols, not principles!

This fascination with appearances and names is the result of the absence of legitimate political awareness, because Islam is not measured by origin, name, or race, but by commitment to the principle of Islam in its entirety; as a system, creed, and law. A Muslim who does not rule by Islam or support it has no value, but rather submits to the infidel capitalist system and justifies infidelity and deviations in the name of "freedom".

Let all Muslims who rejoiced in his victory and thought that he was a seed of good or the beginning of revival know that revival does not come from within systems of disbelief, nor with their tools, nor through their ballot boxes, nor under the ceiling of their constitutions.

Whoever presents himself through the democratic system, swears to respect its laws, then defends and celebrates homosexuality, and calls for what angers God, is not a supporter of Islam or a hope for the nation, but rather a tool for polishing and diluting, and a false representation that does not advance or delay anything.

The so-called political successes in the West for some personalities with Islamic names are nothing but crumbs presented as painkillers to the nation, to be told: Look, change is possible through our systems.

 So what is the reality of this "representation"?

The West does not open the doors of rule to Islam, but only opens them to those who identify with its values and ideas. Anyone who enters their system must accept their constitution and their man-made laws, and renounce the rule of Islam. If he agrees to that, he becomes an acceptable model, but the true Muslim is rejected by them from his roots.

So who is Zohran Mamdani? And why is this illusion being created?

He is a person who carries a Muslim name but adopts a deviant agenda that is completely contrary to the nature of Islam, from supporting homosexuals and promoting what is called their "rights". He is a living example of how the West makes its models: Muslim in name, secular in reality, a servant of the Western liberal agenda, nothing more. Rather, to distract the nation from its true path. Instead of demanding the state of Islam and the Caliphate, it is preoccupied with parliamentary seats and positions in systems of disbelief! Instead of heading to liberate Palestine, it waits for someone to "defend Gaza" from inside the American Congress or the European Parliament!

The truth of the matter is that this is a distortion of the true path of change, which is the establishment of the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the Prophetic method, which raises the banner of Islam, establishes the law of God, and unites the nation behind one Caliph who is fought from behind and feared.

So do not be deceived by names, and do not rejoice in those who belong to you in form and disagree with you in content, for not everyone who bears the name Saeed, Ali, or Zohran is on the path of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Know that change does not come from within the parliaments of disbelief, but from the armies of the nation that have come to move, and from its conscious youth who work day and night to turn the tables on the West and its aides and its treacherous followers in the lands of Islam and the Muslims.

Muslims will not rise through democratic elections or through Western ballot boxes, but through a real renaissance based on the Islamic creed, by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate that restores Islam's status, Muslims' dignity, and shatters the illusions of democracy.

Do not be deceived by names, and do not pin your hopes on individuals in systems of disbelief, but return to your great project: the resumption of Islamic life, for this alone is the path to glory, victory, and empowerment.

The scene is a humiliating repetition of old tragedies: false symbols, loyalty to Western regimes, and deviation from the path of Islam. Everyone who applauds this path is misleading the nation. Return to the Caliphate project, and do not let the enemies of Islam make your leaders and representatives for you. Glory is not in the seats of democracy, but in the saddle of the Caliphate, for which Hizb ut-Tahrir works and warns the nation against this intellectual and political decline. There is no salvation for us except with the state of the Caliphate, which does not allow Muslims to be ruled by those who profess a religion other than Islam, nor by those who justify deviance and perversion, nor by those who legislate for people other than what God has revealed.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Abdul Mahmoud Al-Ameri - Yemen Province

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality: The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality

The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Al-Ahram Gate reported on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, that the Egyptian Prime Minister, in a speech delivered on behalf of the President at the Second World Summit for Social Development in Doha, Qatar, said that Egypt is implementing a comprehensive approach to eliminate poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including "multidimensional poverty."

For years, official speeches in Egypt have rarely been devoid of phrases such as "a comprehensive approach to eliminating poverty" and "the real launch of the Egyptian economy." Officials repeat these slogans at conferences and events, accompanied by glossy images of investment projects, hotels, and resorts. But the reality, as evidenced by international reports, is quite different. Poverty in Egypt remains a deeply rooted, and even worsening, phenomenon, despite repeated government promises of improvement and renaissance.

According to reports by UNICEF, ESCWA, and the World Food Programme for 2024 and 2025, about one in five Egyptians lives in multidimensional poverty, meaning they are deprived of more than one aspect of basic life, such as education, health, housing, work, and services. The data also confirms that more than 49% of families suffer from difficulties in obtaining sufficient food, a shocking figure that reflects the depth of the living crisis.

As for financial poverty, i.e., low income compared to the costs of living, it has risen sharply as a result of successive waves of inflation that have eroded people's wages, efforts, and savings, until a large percentage of Egyptians are below the financial poverty line despite their constant work.

While the government talks about initiatives such as "Takaful and Karama" and "Decent Life," international figures reveal that these programs have not radically changed the structure of poverty, but have been limited to temporary palliatives similar to a drop poured into the desert. The Egyptian countryside, where more than half of the population lives, still suffers from poor services, a lack of decent job opportunities, and dilapidated infrastructure. The ESCWA report confirms that deprivation in the countryside is several times greater than in the cities, which indicates poor distribution of wealth and chronic neglect of the peripheries.

When the Prime Minister thanks the citizen "who has endured with the government the measures of economic reform," he is in fact acknowledging the existence of real suffering resulting from these policies. However, this acknowledgment is not followed by a change in approach, but rather a continuation on the same capitalist path that caused the crisis.

The alleged reform that began in 2016 with the "floatation" program, raising subsidies, and increasing taxes, was not a reform but rather a burdening of the poor with the cost of debts and deficits. At a time when officials are talking about "the launch," huge investments are going to luxury real estate and tourism projects that serve the owners of capital, while millions of young people find no opportunities for work or housing. Indeed, many of these projects, such as the Alam El Roum area in Matrouh, whose investments are estimated at $29 billion, are foreign capitalist partnerships that acquire land and wealth and turn them into a source of profit for investors, not a source of livelihood for the people.

The regime fails not only because it is corrupt, but because it follows a false intellectual basis, which is the capitalist system, which makes money the focus of all state policies. Capitalism is based on absolute freedom of ownership, and allows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few who own the means of production, while the many bear the burden of taxes, prices, and public debt.

Therefore, all so-called "social protection programs" are merely an attempt to beautify the brutal face of capitalism, and to prolong the life of an unjust system that takes into account the rich and collects from the poor. Instead of addressing the root of the disease; i.e., the monopoly of wealth and the dependence of the economy on international institutions, it is sufficient to distribute crumbs of cash aid, which do not alleviate poverty or preserve dignity.

Care is not a favor from the ruler to the ruled, but a legitimate duty, and a responsibility for which God will hold him accountable in this world and the hereafter. What is happening today is a deliberate neglect of people's affairs, and an abandonment of the duty of care in favor of conditional loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The state has become an intermediary between the poor and the foreign creditor, imposing taxes, reducing subsidies, and selling public property to cover a swollen deficit created by the capitalist system itself. In all of this, the legitimate concepts that regulate the economy are absent, such as the prohibition of usury, the prevention of the ownership of public wealth by individuals, and the obligation to spend on the people from the treasury of the Muslims.

Islam has presented an integrated economic system that addresses poverty at its roots, not just with cash support or cosmetic projects. This system is based on fixed legitimate foundations, the most prominent of which are:

1- Prohibiting usury and usurious debts that shackle the state and drain its resources. By eliminating usury, the dependence of the economy on international institutions will disappear, and the financial sovereignty of the nation will be restored.

2- Making ownership three types:

Individual ownership: such as houses, shops, and private farms...

Public ownership: includes major wealth such as oil, gas, minerals, and water...

State ownership: such as fay' lands, rikaz, and kharaj...

With this distribution, justice is achieved, as a small group is prevented from monopolizing the nation's resources.

3- Guaranteeing sufficiency for every individual of the people: The state guarantees for every person in its care their basic needs of food, clothing, and housing. If they are unable to work, the treasury must spend on them.

4- Zakat and mandatory spending: Zakat is not a charity, but an obligation, collected by the state and spent in its legitimate channels for the poor, the needy, and the debtors. It is an effective distribution tool that returns money to the cycle of life in society.

Along with stimulating productive work and preventing exploitation, and urging investment of resources in real beneficial projects such as heavy and military industries, not in speculation, luxury real estate and fictitious projects. In addition to adjusting prices with real supply and demand, not with monopoly or floatation.

The Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood is the only one capable of applying these provisions practically, because it is built on the basis of Islamic creed, and its goal is to care for people's affairs, not to collect their money. Under the Khilafah, there is no usury or conditional loans, and no sale of public wealth to foreigners, but resources are managed in a way that achieves the interest of the nation, and the treasury finances health care, education, and public facilities from state resources, kharaj, anfal, and public property.

As for the poor, their basic needs are guaranteed individually, not through temporary charity but as a guaranteed legitimate right. Therefore, fighting poverty in Islam is not a political slogan, but an integrated system of life that establishes justice, prevents injustice, and returns wealth to its people.

Between the official discourse and the lived reality is a huge distance that is not hidden from anyone. While the government boasts of its "giant" projects and the "real launch," millions of Egyptians live below the poverty line, suffering from high prices, unemployment, and a lack of hope. The truth is that this suffering will not disappear as long as Egypt continues on the path of capitalism, surrendering its economy to usurers and submitting to the policies of international institutions.

The crises and problems of Egypt are human problems and not material ones, and they relate to legitimate rulings that show how to deal with them and treat them on the basis of Islam, and the solutions are easier than turning a blind eye, but they need a sincere administration that has a free will that wants to walk in the right path and truly wants good for Egypt and its people, and then this administration must review all the contracts that were previously concluded and that are concluded with all the companies that monopolize the assets of the country and what is of its public ownership, and at the forefront are companies exploring for gas, oil, gold and the rest of the minerals and wealth, and expel all those companies because they are originally colonial companies plundering the wealth of the country, then formulate a new covenant based on enabling people to access the country's wealth and establishing or leasing companies that are based on producing wealth from the sources of oil, gas, gold and other minerals and redistribute these wealth to the people again, then people will be able to cultivate the dead land that the state will enable them to exploit with their right in it, and they will also be able to manufacture what must be manufactured to raise the economy of Egypt and suffice its people, and the state will support them in this way, and all this is not a figment of the imagination or impossible to happen or a project that we present for experimentation that may succeed or fail, but it is legitimate rulings that are necessary and binding on the state and the people, so the state may not give up the wealth of the country that is owned by the people under the pretext of contracts approved and supported by unjust international laws, and it may not prevent people from it, but it must cut off every hand that extends plundering to the wealth of the people, this is what Islam offers and must be implemented, but it is not applied in isolation from the rest of the systems of Islam, but it is only applied through the Rashidun Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood, this state whose concern and call for is carried by Hizb ut-Tahrir and calls on Egypt and its people, people and army, to work with it for its sake, may God write the conquest from Him, so we see it a reality that honors Islam and its people, O God, sooner rather than later.

﴿If the people of the towns had but believed and been righteous, We would have opened for them blessings from heaven and earth.﴾

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saeed Fadl

Member of the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Egypt