استقلال السودان... حقيقة أم تضليل؟!
December 30, 2016

استقلال السودان... حقيقة أم تضليل؟!

استقلال السودان... حقيقة أم تضليل؟!


نلاحظ هذه الأيام عبر وسائط الإعلام في السودان من صحف وفضائيات وإذاعات الكثير من التصريحات والمقالات للوسط السياسي والصحفيين والمسؤولين في الدولة عما يسمى "استقلال السودان" محتفية بهذا الحدث الذي تأتي ذكراه وقد مر أكثر من ستين عاماً على خروج المستعمر البريطاني بجيوشه من بلاد السودان.


وهنا لا بد أن نتوقف قليلا ونفكر في حقيقة هذا "الاستقلال" ولا ننجرف مع الموجة فنصبح من جوقة المطبلين ومرددي "الأهازيج الوطنية".


وحتى نصل إلى الحقيقة الساطعة لا بد من إعطاء لمحة تاريخية عن الاستعمار الذي أعقب خروجه من البلاد التي احتلها نشوءُ فترة ومرحلة أطلق عليها الساسة مصطلح "الاستقلال"، فبعد ضعف ثم انهيار الدولة العثمانية في أواخر القرن التاسع عشر وأوائل القرن العشرين دخلت الدول الأوروبية على الخط، فحلت محل الدولة العثمانية في البلاد التي كانت تسيطر عليها.


قامت الدول الأوروبية بالسيطرة المباشرة ووضع اليد على تركة الدولة العثمانية عبر الاحتلال العسكري، وكان السودان من ضمنها، فقد قامت بريطانيا باحتلال السودان في العام 1898م ومكثت فيه حتى العام 1956م. هيمنت بريطانيا على السودان بعد احتلالها له، وقامت بتسخير إمكانياته الهائلة وثرواته الضخمة لخدمة مصالح التاج البريطاني، واتخذت العديد من السياسات والوسائل والأساليب والأدوات بما يضمن لها استمرار هيمنتها على السودان في كل مناحي الحياة السياسية والاقتصادية والاجتماعية والفكرية والثقافية والتعليمية.


نشأت فكرة "استقلال الشعوب" في أربعينات وخمسينات القرن الماضي بعد تبني الاتحاد السوفياتي للفكرة، فنادى بتحرر الشعوب، وفك ارتباطها مع المحتل، وطرد الجيوش الغازية، وقام الاتحاد السوفياتي آنذاك بدعم الحركات الساعية لتحرير بلادها من المستعمر فأوجد ذلك رأيا عاما قويا في العالم لهذه الفكرة، ثم تبنت أمريكا أيضاً الفكرة بعد الحرب العالمية الثانية ونادت بها حتى تحرم المستعمر الأوروبي من مناطق نفوذه، وتوجد لها موطئ قدم في البلاد التي احتلها الأوروبيون.


كل ذلك دفع المستعمر الأوروبي وعلى رأسه بريطانيا وفرنسا للانحناء أمام العاصفة، ومن ثم تفتق ذهن الدول المستعمرة على فكرة الخروج عسكريا من البلاد التي احتلتها مع ربط تلك البلاد بها في كل المجالات، وتكبيلها بقيود واتفاقيات تضمن لها السيطرة الكاملة.


ففي السودان وهو موضوع مقالنا خرج المستعمر البريطاني بجيوشه مطمئنا على مصالحه ونفوذه، وتم ذلك بتسليم البلاد إلى نخبة سياسية أشرف هو نفسه على صنعها لتتولى إدارة دفة البلاد من بعد رحيله بما يؤمن له استمرار هيمنته، وهذه النخبة تدين له بالولاء والخضوع، وتحرص على تنفيذ سياساته ورعاية مصالحه، ولذلك سمح المحتل البريطاني لهذه النخبة بالعمل، وعمل على إبرازهم كقادة ومناضلين وهم غارقون حتى الثمالة في الولاء للمستعمر، وقد ذكر الكاتب الصحفي الشهير ورئيس تحرير صحيفة التيار السودانية عثمان ميرغني في كتابه (عشر مخاز سودانية... كيف أضاعوا السودان) ذكر بعضاً من التاريخ الأسود لهذه القيادات الذين أطلق عليهم لاحقاً لقب (رواد الاستقلال) وجاء في الكتاب ما يلي:


"في يوم 28 تموز/يوليو عام 1919 استقبل الملك جورج الخامس ملك بريطانيا في قصره في بكنجهام وفداً مثل السودان كلّه... أفقياً ورأسياً... الوفد يتكون من ثلاثة من أكبر زعماء الطوائف الدينية... هم السيد علي الميرغني زعيم الطائفة الختمية، والسيد عبد الرحمن المهدي زعيم طائفة الأنصار، والسيد الشريف يوسف الهندي. ويرافقهم ثلاثة من العلماء السودانيين هم: الشيخ علي الطيب أحمد هاشم "مفتي السودان"، والشيخ أبو القاسم أحمد هاشم "رئيس لجنة العلماء"، والشيخ إسماعيل الأزهري "قاضي دارفور"، ومعهم أربعة من زعماء القبائل هم: السيد علي التوم "ناظر الكبابيش"، والسيد إبراهيم موسى "ناظر الهدندوة"، والسيد عوض الكريم أبو سن "نائب ناظر الشكرية"، والسيد إبراهيم محمد فرح "ناظر الجعليين"." سجلت الصحف البريطانية - وبالتحديد - صحيفة (التايمز) خبر هذه الزيارة التاريخية، وأنا - هنا - أستأذن الأستاذ بدر الدين حامد الهاشمي في استخدام ترجمته لخبر نشرته صحيفة (التايمز)، ونقلته صحيفة أسترالية بعد عدة أشهر. عنوان الخبر (ولاء السودان: وفد الزعماء إلى الملك:SUDAN LOYALTY CHIEF'S DEPUTATION TO THE KING)


"ترجمة: بدر الدين حامد الهاشمي، أوردت صحيفة التايمز في يوم 29 تموز/يوليو 1919م نبأ زيارة وفد الزعماء السودانيين - وهم في ملابسهم التقليدية - إلى قصر بكنغهام في اليوم السابق، حيث قدموا للملك (جورج الخامس) خطاب تهنئة وولاء؛ بمناسبة انتهاء الحرب بنصر مبين، وكان يرافق الوفد السوداني - الذي ترأسه السيد السير علي الميرغني - كلٌّ من اللواء السير ريجيلاند ونجت، والمشير لورد قرينفيل، والسير أيدقارد بيرنارد، واستقبل الوفد في القصر - أولاً - لورد كرومر، والذي أخذهم إلى مقابلة الملك والملكة، وألقى رئيس وفد الزعماء السودانيين كلمة باللغة العربية تولى ترجمتها السير ونجت."


هذه القيادات التي قدمت الولاء الكامل والخضوع التام للمستعمر هي نفسها التي كانت تتصدر مشهد ما يسمى (إعلان الإستقلال!!)


وقد جاء في بيان "الاستقلال" الذي تلاه إسماعيل الأزهري: (ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﻌﻨﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻤﺠﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﻷﺑﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻴﻮﻳﺘﻪ ﻭﺇﻳﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺛﻤﺮ ﺃﻃﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺜﻤﺮﺍﺕ، ﻭﺃﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎً علي في ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺯﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﻣﺼﺮ وﺣﻜﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻠﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﻴﻦ ﺃﻭﻓﺘﺎ ﺑﻌﻬﺪﻫﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻣﺘﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺰاﻣﺎﺗﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ قطعتاها ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻓﺒﺮﺍﻳﺮ 1953ﻡ، ﻭﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺭﺍﺿﻴﺔ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ أﺭﺽ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻦ ﺳﺘﺔً ﻭﺧﻤﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﺎً ﻟﻴﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺎً ﺧﻔﺎﻗﺎً ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﻞ).


إذاً كان خروج المحتل البريطاني صفقة سياسية تمت، خرج بعدها المحتل مطمئنا على مصالحه ونفوذه في السودان.


واليوم بعد ستين عاماً من خروج جيوش المستعمر ما تزال بلادنا ترزح تحت نير الاستعمار الغربي، ويحكم الغرب قبضته على مفاصل الحياة:


سياسيا: يشهد السودان تدخلا مباشرا من دول الغرب في شؤونه الداخلية، والسياسات التي ينتهجها النظام السوداني تكون تنفيذا لتوجيهات مباشرة من قبل أمريكا، وأقرب مثال على ذلك هو موضوع "الحوار الوطني" الجاري حتى الآن والذي جاء تنفيذا لتوصيات ومقررات مركز السلام الأمريكي الذي صدرت منه ورقة بعنوان (الطريق إلى الحوار الوطني في السودان) كتبها كل من المبعوث الأمريكي السابق للسودان (برنستون ليمان)، ومدير برنامج القرن الأفريقي التابع لمركز السلام الأمريكي (جون تيمن) بتاريخ 2013/8/13 جاء فيها: (لقد حان الوقت لأن يشرع السودان في حوار داخلي حقيقي، وعملية إصلاحية تؤدي إلى حكومة ممثلة لقاعدة واسعة، وديمقراطية، وقادرة على السعي نحو عملية مصالحة مجدية بين السودانيين)، ثم زار الرئيس الأمريكي الأسبق جيمي كارتر رئيس الجمهورية عمر البشير يوم 2014/1/21، ثم أعقب ذلك إعلان البشير لخطاب "الوثبة" الشهير في 2014/1/27 الذي دعا فيه القوى السياسية السودانية إلى "حوار وطني شامل" لحل مشكلات السودان.


اقتصاديا: تسير البلاد وفقاً للنظام الاقتصادي الرأسمالي الذي فرضته دول الغرب، وترتبط السياسات الاقتصادية في السودان بالمنظمات الدولية التي يسيطر عليها الغرب كصندوق النقد الدولي والبنك الدولي، كما ترتبط العملة المحلية بالدولار الأمريكي، ومعظم ثروات البلاد تحت هيمنة الشركات الرأسمالية الغربية العابرة للقارات.


اجتماعيا: تسود مظاهر ومفاهيم الحضارة الغربية، ويتجلى ذلك في المظهر العام للشارع وشيوع ثقافة الحرية الشخصية، وانتشار الزنا والمخدرات والجريمة والتفكك المجتمعي والأسري.


فكريا: هيمنت أفكار ونظم ومفاهيم وقيم المستعمر على السودان، وشاعت أفكار الديمقراطية والعلمانية والرأسمالية والحريات والوطنية والقومية والليبرالية عند الأوساط السياسية والنخب المثقفة، كما تمت صياغة مناهج التعليم على أساس هذه الأفكار، وصار الإعلام ناشرا ومروجا لأفكار الغرب وحضارته ونمط عيشه.


عسكريا: عاد المستعمر بجيوشه مرة أخرى عبر واجهات جديدة ومسميات خادعة، فالسودان توجد على أرضه أكبر قوة لما يسمى "قوات حفظ السلام الدولية" في دارفور أو ما يعرف بـ"قوات اليوناميد" التي يبلغ تعدادها أكثر من ستة وعشرين ألف جندي مزوَّدين بكل أنواع العدة والعتاد، وتمارس هذه القوات الأممية سياسات خبيثة تدعم المتمردين، كما تقوم بانتهاكات بحق أهل دارفور تحت سمع وبصر النظام الحاكم الذي تحدى الناطق الرسمي لقوات اليوناميد رئيسه الذي يعتبر أعلى سلطة سياسية في البلاد حين تحدث عن خروج اليوناميد فرد عليه متحدث اليوناميد متحديا: (يوناميد لن تخرج من دارفور والخرطوم تعلم ذلك)، كما توجد "قوات حفظ سلام" أممية في منطقة أبيي، بالإضافة للمبعوثين الدوليين من دول الغرب والأمم المتحدة ومندوبي المنظمات الدولية الذين يجوبون البلاد طولا وعرضا ويدسون أنوفهم في أدق التفاصيل دون أن يحرك النظام الحاكم في السودان تجاههم ساكنا، أو يتخذ حيالهم أي إجراءات تحفظ له "السيادة المزعومة!!"


إن الانعتاق من التبعية للمستعمر وفك الارتباط معه لا يسمى "استقلالاً"، فهو كما أسلفنا فكرة خبيثة لتمزيق بلاد المسلمين التي تجمعها دولة واحدة، واستبدال كيانات هزيلة تحت مسمى "الدولة الوطنية" التي أشرف على صنعها المستعمر نفسه بها، لكن الانفكاك من ربقة الاستعمار يسمى "تحرراً"، وهذا التحرر لا يتم إلا من خلال دولة مبدئية تجعل من الإسلام أساسا لها، وتجمع شتات المسلمين في كيان واحد، وهذه الدولة هي التي سوف تقوم بكنس كل آثار ومخلفات المستعمر في بلادنا، فلا تبقى له باقية، فتستعيد الأمة سلطانها وسيادتها من المستعمر وأذنابه من الحكام العملاء.


ويسير الاقتصاد وفقا لنظام محكم من رب البشر يسوس الناس بالعدل فينعموا بالرخاء والأمان.


وتتحول مظاهر الحياة العامة من فسق وفجور وانحلال في ظل نظم الحضارة الغربية إلى إلتزام بأحكام الله عز وجل وتماسك وترابط للمجتمع والأسرة في ظل نظام الإسلام ونمط عيشه الراقي.


وتسود في الأمة مفاهيم وأفكار الإسلام كالشريعة والخلافة والجهاد والتقيد بالحكم الشرعي وغيرها من الأفكار الإسلامية النيرة.


وتتم صياغة مناهج التعليم على أساس أفكار الإسلام، ويروج ويسوق الإعلام للإسلام شارحا للعالم البائس الشقي تحت النظام الرأسمالي البغيض كيف يستطيع الإسلام إخراجهم من الشدة إلى الرخاء ومن ضيق الدنيا إلى سعة الدنيا والآخرة.


﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ اسْتَجِيبُواْ لِلّهِ وَلِلرَّسُولِ إِذَا دَعَاكُم لِمَا يُحْيِيكُمْ وَاعْلَمُواْ أَنَّ اللّهَ يَحُولُ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَقَلْبِهِ وَأَنَّهُ إِلَيْهِ تُحْشَرُونَ﴾

كتبه للمكتب الإعلامي المركزي لحزب التحرير


علي بابكر محمد مختار - ولاية السودان

More from null

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Every time we are presented with a "new symbol" with Muslim roots or Eastern features, many Muslims cheer, and hopes are built on an illusion called "political representation" in an infidel system that does not recognize Islam as a ruling system, a creed, or a law.

We all remember the overwhelming joy that swept through the feelings of many when Obama won in 2008. He is the son of Kenya, and he has a Muslim father! Here, some imagined that Islam and Muslims had become close to American influence, but Obama was one of the most harmful presidents to Muslims. He destroyed Libya, contributed to the tragedy of Syria, and ignited Afghanistan and Iraq with his planes and soldiers. Rather, he was the blood shedder in Yemen through his tools, and his era was a continuation of a systematic hostility against the nation.

Today, the scene is repeated, but with new names. Zohran Mamdani is celebrated because he is a Muslim, an immigrant, and a young man, as if he is the savior! But only a few look at his political and intellectual positions. This man is a strong supporter of homosexuals, participates in their activities, and considers their deviation a human right!

What a shame that people pin their hopes on this?! Wasn't it a repetition of the same political and intellectual disappointment that the nation has fallen into time and time again?! Yes, because it is captivated by appearance, not essence! Deceived by smiles, and deals with emotion, not creed, with names, not concepts, and with symbols, not principles!

This fascination with appearances and names is the result of the absence of legitimate political awareness, because Islam is not measured by origin, name, or race, but by commitment to the principle of Islam in its entirety; as a system, creed, and law. A Muslim who does not rule by Islam or support it has no value, but rather submits to the infidel capitalist system and justifies infidelity and deviations in the name of "freedom".

Let all Muslims who rejoiced in his victory and thought that he was a seed of good or the beginning of revival know that revival does not come from within systems of disbelief, nor with their tools, nor through their ballot boxes, nor under the ceiling of their constitutions.

Whoever presents himself through the democratic system, swears to respect its laws, then defends and celebrates homosexuality, and calls for what angers God, is not a supporter of Islam or a hope for the nation, but rather a tool for polishing and diluting, and a false representation that does not advance or delay anything.

The so-called political successes in the West for some personalities with Islamic names are nothing but crumbs presented as painkillers to the nation, to be told: Look, change is possible through our systems.

 So what is the reality of this "representation"?

The West does not open the doors of rule to Islam, but only opens them to those who identify with its values and ideas. Anyone who enters their system must accept their constitution and their man-made laws, and renounce the rule of Islam. If he agrees to that, he becomes an acceptable model, but the true Muslim is rejected by them from his roots.

So who is Zohran Mamdani? And why is this illusion being created?

He is a person who carries a Muslim name but adopts a deviant agenda that is completely contrary to the nature of Islam, from supporting homosexuals and promoting what is called their "rights". He is a living example of how the West makes its models: Muslim in name, secular in reality, a servant of the Western liberal agenda, nothing more. Rather, to distract the nation from its true path. Instead of demanding the state of Islam and the Caliphate, it is preoccupied with parliamentary seats and positions in systems of disbelief! Instead of heading to liberate Palestine, it waits for someone to "defend Gaza" from inside the American Congress or the European Parliament!

The truth of the matter is that this is a distortion of the true path of change, which is the establishment of the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the Prophetic method, which raises the banner of Islam, establishes the law of God, and unites the nation behind one Caliph who is fought from behind and feared.

So do not be deceived by names, and do not rejoice in those who belong to you in form and disagree with you in content, for not everyone who bears the name Saeed, Ali, or Zohran is on the path of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Know that change does not come from within the parliaments of disbelief, but from the armies of the nation that have come to move, and from its conscious youth who work day and night to turn the tables on the West and its aides and its treacherous followers in the lands of Islam and the Muslims.

Muslims will not rise through democratic elections or through Western ballot boxes, but through a real renaissance based on the Islamic creed, by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate that restores Islam's status, Muslims' dignity, and shatters the illusions of democracy.

Do not be deceived by names, and do not pin your hopes on individuals in systems of disbelief, but return to your great project: the resumption of Islamic life, for this alone is the path to glory, victory, and empowerment.

The scene is a humiliating repetition of old tragedies: false symbols, loyalty to Western regimes, and deviation from the path of Islam. Everyone who applauds this path is misleading the nation. Return to the Caliphate project, and do not let the enemies of Islam make your leaders and representatives for you. Glory is not in the seats of democracy, but in the saddle of the Caliphate, for which Hizb ut-Tahrir works and warns the nation against this intellectual and political decline. There is no salvation for us except with the state of the Caliphate, which does not allow Muslims to be ruled by those who profess a religion other than Islam, nor by those who justify deviance and perversion, nor by those who legislate for people other than what God has revealed.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Abdul Mahmoud Al-Ameri - Yemen Province

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality: The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality

The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Al-Ahram Gate reported on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, that the Egyptian Prime Minister, in a speech delivered on behalf of the President at the Second World Summit for Social Development in Doha, Qatar, said that Egypt is implementing a comprehensive approach to eliminate poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including "multidimensional poverty."

For years, official speeches in Egypt have rarely been devoid of phrases such as "a comprehensive approach to eliminating poverty" and "the real launch of the Egyptian economy." Officials repeat these slogans at conferences and events, accompanied by glossy images of investment projects, hotels, and resorts. But the reality, as evidenced by international reports, is quite different. Poverty in Egypt remains a deeply rooted, and even worsening, phenomenon, despite repeated government promises of improvement and renaissance.

According to reports by UNICEF, ESCWA, and the World Food Programme for 2024 and 2025, about one in five Egyptians lives in multidimensional poverty, meaning they are deprived of more than one aspect of basic life, such as education, health, housing, work, and services. The data also confirms that more than 49% of families suffer from difficulties in obtaining sufficient food, a shocking figure that reflects the depth of the living crisis.

As for financial poverty, i.e., low income compared to the costs of living, it has risen sharply as a result of successive waves of inflation that have eroded people's wages, efforts, and savings, until a large percentage of Egyptians are below the financial poverty line despite their constant work.

While the government talks about initiatives such as "Takaful and Karama" and "Decent Life," international figures reveal that these programs have not radically changed the structure of poverty, but have been limited to temporary palliatives similar to a drop poured into the desert. The Egyptian countryside, where more than half of the population lives, still suffers from poor services, a lack of decent job opportunities, and dilapidated infrastructure. The ESCWA report confirms that deprivation in the countryside is several times greater than in the cities, which indicates poor distribution of wealth and chronic neglect of the peripheries.

When the Prime Minister thanks the citizen "who has endured with the government the measures of economic reform," he is in fact acknowledging the existence of real suffering resulting from these policies. However, this acknowledgment is not followed by a change in approach, but rather a continuation on the same capitalist path that caused the crisis.

The alleged reform that began in 2016 with the "floatation" program, raising subsidies, and increasing taxes, was not a reform but rather a burdening of the poor with the cost of debts and deficits. At a time when officials are talking about "the launch," huge investments are going to luxury real estate and tourism projects that serve the owners of capital, while millions of young people find no opportunities for work or housing. Indeed, many of these projects, such as the Alam El Roum area in Matrouh, whose investments are estimated at $29 billion, are foreign capitalist partnerships that acquire land and wealth and turn them into a source of profit for investors, not a source of livelihood for the people.

The regime fails not only because it is corrupt, but because it follows a false intellectual basis, which is the capitalist system, which makes money the focus of all state policies. Capitalism is based on absolute freedom of ownership, and allows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few who own the means of production, while the many bear the burden of taxes, prices, and public debt.

Therefore, all so-called "social protection programs" are merely an attempt to beautify the brutal face of capitalism, and to prolong the life of an unjust system that takes into account the rich and collects from the poor. Instead of addressing the root of the disease; i.e., the monopoly of wealth and the dependence of the economy on international institutions, it is sufficient to distribute crumbs of cash aid, which do not alleviate poverty or preserve dignity.

Care is not a favor from the ruler to the ruled, but a legitimate duty, and a responsibility for which God will hold him accountable in this world and the hereafter. What is happening today is a deliberate neglect of people's affairs, and an abandonment of the duty of care in favor of conditional loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The state has become an intermediary between the poor and the foreign creditor, imposing taxes, reducing subsidies, and selling public property to cover a swollen deficit created by the capitalist system itself. In all of this, the legitimate concepts that regulate the economy are absent, such as the prohibition of usury, the prevention of the ownership of public wealth by individuals, and the obligation to spend on the people from the treasury of the Muslims.

Islam has presented an integrated economic system that addresses poverty at its roots, not just with cash support or cosmetic projects. This system is based on fixed legitimate foundations, the most prominent of which are:

1- Prohibiting usury and usurious debts that shackle the state and drain its resources. By eliminating usury, the dependence of the economy on international institutions will disappear, and the financial sovereignty of the nation will be restored.

2- Making ownership three types:

Individual ownership: such as houses, shops, and private farms...

Public ownership: includes major wealth such as oil, gas, minerals, and water...

State ownership: such as fay' lands, rikaz, and kharaj...

With this distribution, justice is achieved, as a small group is prevented from monopolizing the nation's resources.

3- Guaranteeing sufficiency for every individual of the people: The state guarantees for every person in its care their basic needs of food, clothing, and housing. If they are unable to work, the treasury must spend on them.

4- Zakat and mandatory spending: Zakat is not a charity, but an obligation, collected by the state and spent in its legitimate channels for the poor, the needy, and the debtors. It is an effective distribution tool that returns money to the cycle of life in society.

Along with stimulating productive work and preventing exploitation, and urging investment of resources in real beneficial projects such as heavy and military industries, not in speculation, luxury real estate and fictitious projects. In addition to adjusting prices with real supply and demand, not with monopoly or floatation.

The Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood is the only one capable of applying these provisions practically, because it is built on the basis of Islamic creed, and its goal is to care for people's affairs, not to collect their money. Under the Khilafah, there is no usury or conditional loans, and no sale of public wealth to foreigners, but resources are managed in a way that achieves the interest of the nation, and the treasury finances health care, education, and public facilities from state resources, kharaj, anfal, and public property.

As for the poor, their basic needs are guaranteed individually, not through temporary charity but as a guaranteed legitimate right. Therefore, fighting poverty in Islam is not a political slogan, but an integrated system of life that establishes justice, prevents injustice, and returns wealth to its people.

Between the official discourse and the lived reality is a huge distance that is not hidden from anyone. While the government boasts of its "giant" projects and the "real launch," millions of Egyptians live below the poverty line, suffering from high prices, unemployment, and a lack of hope. The truth is that this suffering will not disappear as long as Egypt continues on the path of capitalism, surrendering its economy to usurers and submitting to the policies of international institutions.

The crises and problems of Egypt are human problems and not material ones, and they relate to legitimate rulings that show how to deal with them and treat them on the basis of Islam, and the solutions are easier than turning a blind eye, but they need a sincere administration that has a free will that wants to walk in the right path and truly wants good for Egypt and its people, and then this administration must review all the contracts that were previously concluded and that are concluded with all the companies that monopolize the assets of the country and what is of its public ownership, and at the forefront are companies exploring for gas, oil, gold and the rest of the minerals and wealth, and expel all those companies because they are originally colonial companies plundering the wealth of the country, then formulate a new covenant based on enabling people to access the country's wealth and establishing or leasing companies that are based on producing wealth from the sources of oil, gas, gold and other minerals and redistribute these wealth to the people again, then people will be able to cultivate the dead land that the state will enable them to exploit with their right in it, and they will also be able to manufacture what must be manufactured to raise the economy of Egypt and suffice its people, and the state will support them in this way, and all this is not a figment of the imagination or impossible to happen or a project that we present for experimentation that may succeed or fail, but it is legitimate rulings that are necessary and binding on the state and the people, so the state may not give up the wealth of the country that is owned by the people under the pretext of contracts approved and supported by unjust international laws, and it may not prevent people from it, but it must cut off every hand that extends plundering to the wealth of the people, this is what Islam offers and must be implemented, but it is not applied in isolation from the rest of the systems of Islam, but it is only applied through the Rashidun Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood, this state whose concern and call for is carried by Hizb ut-Tahrir and calls on Egypt and its people, people and army, to work with it for its sake, may God write the conquest from Him, so we see it a reality that honors Islam and its people, O God, sooner rather than later.

﴿If the people of the towns had but believed and been righteous, We would have opened for them blessings from heaven and earth.﴾

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saeed Fadl

Member of the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Egypt