The Ruling on Participating in Democratic Elections
August 05, 2025

The Ruling on Participating in Democratic Elections

The Ruling on Participating in Democratic Elections

The head of the National Elections Authority announced on Tuesday, July 1, 2025, that, based on the provisions of the Constitution and the law, the electoral eligibility for selecting members of the Senate for the second legislative term 2025-2030 has been organized, and to implement this system, procedures for the Senate elections scheduled to be held in early August 2025 are underway.

It is known that the democratic system is based on the separation of religion from the state, and making legislation for the people through the councils of representatives that draft the constitution and laws.

O Muslims in the land of Kinana, it is clear that this system is proceeding in applying the democracy that the infidel West has legislated for us, which has brought us woes of killing and destroying villages, promoting obscenity, and creating a gap between segments of society, where it has made a small segment of society acquire the largest part of the country's wealth.

The democratic system is a consecration of the secular civil state, which people are deceived into believing is a state of institutions in which people are equal before the law and guarantees freedoms for all, and this in itself is false, given what we have seen over the past decades of the means of repression practiced by the regime.

And also by deceiving Muslims that Islam is the main source of legislation, and this makes other sources of legislation other than revelation.

O Muslims: The infidel West has imposed this system on you through the ruling regime and its agents, in order to prevent Islam from reaching power, so that they can continue to plunder your wealth. Allah Almighty said: ﴿Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muhammad], and what was revealed before you desiring to appeal for judgment to Taghut, while they were commanded to disbelieve in it? And Satan wants to lead them far astray. And when it is said to them, "Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger," you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion.﴾.

The democracy that the West has promoted to us is a system of disbelief, and it is not permissible to take it, work with it, or call for it, and it has no relation to Islam. It is a system of government made by humans, and it has no relation to revelation or religion.

The people's election of agents on their behalf, represented by parliamentary councils that choose the head of state and the government, results in two basic ideas in the democratic system, which are: sovereignty belongs to the people and the people are the source of power.

Statutory laws are voted on by a majority of votes, which is the rule of the majority, which is a statement contrary to the truth. We have seen many laws ratified by the ruler without the knowledge of the legislative councils, and those laws are in the service of the owners of capital and those who benefit from behind the system, even if they are Islamic rulings and are subject to a vote and chosen by the majority, their choice and work with them in this case is only because they are the opinion of the majority and not because they are a legitimate ruling that must be applied. Allah Almighty said ﴿It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, that they should [thereafter] have any choice about their affair. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has certainly strayed into clear error.﴾ It is not appropriate, rather it is not permissible for a believing man or a believing woman, if Allah and His Messenger have ruled on an issue, to choose for themselves an opinion or a ruling that contradicts what came from Allah and His Messenger. Whoever violates the command of Allah and His Messenger, that is, the legislation that the revelation brought, has deviated from the straight path in a clear and obvious deviation.

The basis of democracy and its work is the protection of freedoms, such as the freedom of ownership, which resulted in the existence of greedy capitalism, which absorbs the wealth of the poor to enter into the coffers of the rich, and the idea of ​​personal freedom, which led to the decline of societies, and brought the country to a level of permissiveness, as we see in the media sponsored by the state, and this has led to the disintegration of the family in these societies.

One of the methods of deception of the infidel West is that it adopted the method of misleading Muslims by making them understand that democracy does not contradict Islam because it is the Shura (consultation), and this has affected the majority of Muslims.

Shura is not democracy, and it is not permissible to confuse them because it differs from it in the concept that its owners put in place. Democracy is a system of government and means separating religion from life or the rule of the people. In it, the people are the legislator. They are the ones who set their system, constitution, and laws. As for Shura, it is not a system of government, even if it is part of the system of government. It is a means that is followed in investigating the right opinion, as Shura is taking opinion on a matter. The ruler refers to his advisors, who are those who have experience in the affairs of government if he wants, and the judge refers to the jurists and scholars to find out their opinion on a judicial issue, and so on. Is it permissible for a scholar to ask an engineer about a Sharia issue whose understanding has been confused for him without this engineer having knowledge of jurisprudence and legislation?

The politicians were loyal to the West and its system, and made it the focus of their attention. They seek help from it and rely on it, and they made themselves guards of its laws, servants of its interests, and showed enmity to Allah and His Messenger. They stood in the face of the sincere people who call for the establishment of the Islamic system.

As for in Islam, and its system of government, the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the method of Prophethood, which corresponds to democracy and capitalism in reality, then sovereignty belongs to Sharia and authority belongs to the Ummah.

The meaning of sovereignty belonging to Sharia: that Allah alone is the legislator, and the Ummah does not have the right to legislate a single ruling. Islamic civilization is based on the Islamic creed, and requires directing life and the state with the commands and prohibitions of Allah, that is, with Sharia rulings, and there is no concept of freedoms in Islam. The Muslim is restricted in all his actions and words by what the Sharia texts have brought. Allah Almighty said: ﴿But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission﴾. And He, the Most Glorified, said: ﴿And in anything over which you disagree - its ruling is [to be referred] to Allah﴾.

O Muslims: Elections are not forbidden in themselves, but they are permissible, and they are a means used to choose the Caliph, or to pledge allegiance to the one who has the right to rule, or to choose representatives of the Ummah (such as members of the National Assembly). As for the elections that are held under non-Islamic regimes and that are part of a democratic system of government - such as electing a parliament that legislates without Allah - they are forbidden in Sharia because they affirm the principle of sovereignty of the people and legislation other than what Allah has revealed. Therefore, participating in these elections - whether running or voting - is not permissible in Sharia, because it involves approving a system of disbelief and contributing to the production of institutions that rule by other than what Allah has revealed.

Elections are not absolutely rejected, but they are rejected if they are part of a secular democratic system based on the sovereignty of the people and the legislation of humans. But if it is a means within the system of Islam (the Caliphate) to choose the ruler or those who help him, then it is permissible in Sharia and a legitimate means to organize the government.

Elections that are held within the Caliphate state, that is, the state that applies Islam completely in government, politics, economy, and society, are permissible, even recommended at times. Because it is under the state of justice that rules by the revelation of Allah and His Sharia, and which the Messenger ﷺ gave us glad tidings of: "Prophethood will remain among you as long as Allah wills it to remain, then Allah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Afterwards, there will be a Caliphate according to the method of Prophethood, and it will remain as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then Allah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Afterwards, there will be biting kingship, and it will remain as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then Allah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Afterwards, there will be oppressive kingship, and it will remain as long as Allah wills it to remain. Then Allah will raise it when He wills to raise it. Then there will be a Caliphate according to the method of Prophethood." Then he was silent.

Written by the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saad Muath - Wilayah Egypt

More from null

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Every time we are presented with a "new symbol" with Muslim roots or Eastern features, many Muslims cheer, and hopes are built on an illusion called "political representation" in an infidel system that does not recognize Islam as a ruling system, a creed, or a law.

We all remember the overwhelming joy that swept through the feelings of many when Obama won in 2008. He is the son of Kenya, and he has a Muslim father! Here, some imagined that Islam and Muslims had become close to American influence, but Obama was one of the most harmful presidents to Muslims. He destroyed Libya, contributed to the tragedy of Syria, and ignited Afghanistan and Iraq with his planes and soldiers. Rather, he was the blood shedder in Yemen through his tools, and his era was a continuation of a systematic hostility against the nation.

Today, the scene is repeated, but with new names. Zohran Mamdani is celebrated because he is a Muslim, an immigrant, and a young man, as if he is the savior! But only a few look at his political and intellectual positions. This man is a strong supporter of homosexuals, participates in their activities, and considers their deviation a human right!

What a shame that people pin their hopes on this?! Wasn't it a repetition of the same political and intellectual disappointment that the nation has fallen into time and time again?! Yes, because it is captivated by appearance, not essence! Deceived by smiles, and deals with emotion, not creed, with names, not concepts, and with symbols, not principles!

This fascination with appearances and names is the result of the absence of legitimate political awareness, because Islam is not measured by origin, name, or race, but by commitment to the principle of Islam in its entirety; as a system, creed, and law. A Muslim who does not rule by Islam or support it has no value, but rather submits to the infidel capitalist system and justifies infidelity and deviations in the name of "freedom".

Let all Muslims who rejoiced in his victory and thought that he was a seed of good or the beginning of revival know that revival does not come from within systems of disbelief, nor with their tools, nor through their ballot boxes, nor under the ceiling of their constitutions.

Whoever presents himself through the democratic system, swears to respect its laws, then defends and celebrates homosexuality, and calls for what angers God, is not a supporter of Islam or a hope for the nation, but rather a tool for polishing and diluting, and a false representation that does not advance or delay anything.

The so-called political successes in the West for some personalities with Islamic names are nothing but crumbs presented as painkillers to the nation, to be told: Look, change is possible through our systems.

 So what is the reality of this "representation"?

The West does not open the doors of rule to Islam, but only opens them to those who identify with its values and ideas. Anyone who enters their system must accept their constitution and their man-made laws, and renounce the rule of Islam. If he agrees to that, he becomes an acceptable model, but the true Muslim is rejected by them from his roots.

So who is Zohran Mamdani? And why is this illusion being created?

He is a person who carries a Muslim name but adopts a deviant agenda that is completely contrary to the nature of Islam, from supporting homosexuals and promoting what is called their "rights". He is a living example of how the West makes its models: Muslim in name, secular in reality, a servant of the Western liberal agenda, nothing more. Rather, to distract the nation from its true path. Instead of demanding the state of Islam and the Caliphate, it is preoccupied with parliamentary seats and positions in systems of disbelief! Instead of heading to liberate Palestine, it waits for someone to "defend Gaza" from inside the American Congress or the European Parliament!

The truth of the matter is that this is a distortion of the true path of change, which is the establishment of the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the Prophetic method, which raises the banner of Islam, establishes the law of God, and unites the nation behind one Caliph who is fought from behind and feared.

So do not be deceived by names, and do not rejoice in those who belong to you in form and disagree with you in content, for not everyone who bears the name Saeed, Ali, or Zohran is on the path of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Know that change does not come from within the parliaments of disbelief, but from the armies of the nation that have come to move, and from its conscious youth who work day and night to turn the tables on the West and its aides and its treacherous followers in the lands of Islam and the Muslims.

Muslims will not rise through democratic elections or through Western ballot boxes, but through a real renaissance based on the Islamic creed, by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate that restores Islam's status, Muslims' dignity, and shatters the illusions of democracy.

Do not be deceived by names, and do not pin your hopes on individuals in systems of disbelief, but return to your great project: the resumption of Islamic life, for this alone is the path to glory, victory, and empowerment.

The scene is a humiliating repetition of old tragedies: false symbols, loyalty to Western regimes, and deviation from the path of Islam. Everyone who applauds this path is misleading the nation. Return to the Caliphate project, and do not let the enemies of Islam make your leaders and representatives for you. Glory is not in the seats of democracy, but in the saddle of the Caliphate, for which Hizb ut-Tahrir works and warns the nation against this intellectual and political decline. There is no salvation for us except with the state of the Caliphate, which does not allow Muslims to be ruled by those who profess a religion other than Islam, nor by those who justify deviance and perversion, nor by those who legislate for people other than what God has revealed.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Abdul Mahmoud Al-Ameri - Yemen Province

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality: The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality

The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Al-Ahram Gate reported on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, that the Egyptian Prime Minister, in a speech delivered on behalf of the President at the Second World Summit for Social Development in Doha, Qatar, said that Egypt is implementing a comprehensive approach to eliminate poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including "multidimensional poverty."

For years, official speeches in Egypt have rarely been devoid of phrases such as "a comprehensive approach to eliminating poverty" and "the real launch of the Egyptian economy." Officials repeat these slogans at conferences and events, accompanied by glossy images of investment projects, hotels, and resorts. But the reality, as evidenced by international reports, is quite different. Poverty in Egypt remains a deeply rooted, and even worsening, phenomenon, despite repeated government promises of improvement and renaissance.

According to reports by UNICEF, ESCWA, and the World Food Programme for 2024 and 2025, about one in five Egyptians lives in multidimensional poverty, meaning they are deprived of more than one aspect of basic life, such as education, health, housing, work, and services. The data also confirms that more than 49% of families suffer from difficulties in obtaining sufficient food, a shocking figure that reflects the depth of the living crisis.

As for financial poverty, i.e., low income compared to the costs of living, it has risen sharply as a result of successive waves of inflation that have eroded people's wages, efforts, and savings, until a large percentage of Egyptians are below the financial poverty line despite their constant work.

While the government talks about initiatives such as "Takaful and Karama" and "Decent Life," international figures reveal that these programs have not radically changed the structure of poverty, but have been limited to temporary palliatives similar to a drop poured into the desert. The Egyptian countryside, where more than half of the population lives, still suffers from poor services, a lack of decent job opportunities, and dilapidated infrastructure. The ESCWA report confirms that deprivation in the countryside is several times greater than in the cities, which indicates poor distribution of wealth and chronic neglect of the peripheries.

When the Prime Minister thanks the citizen "who has endured with the government the measures of economic reform," he is in fact acknowledging the existence of real suffering resulting from these policies. However, this acknowledgment is not followed by a change in approach, but rather a continuation on the same capitalist path that caused the crisis.

The alleged reform that began in 2016 with the "floatation" program, raising subsidies, and increasing taxes, was not a reform but rather a burdening of the poor with the cost of debts and deficits. At a time when officials are talking about "the launch," huge investments are going to luxury real estate and tourism projects that serve the owners of capital, while millions of young people find no opportunities for work or housing. Indeed, many of these projects, such as the Alam El Roum area in Matrouh, whose investments are estimated at $29 billion, are foreign capitalist partnerships that acquire land and wealth and turn them into a source of profit for investors, not a source of livelihood for the people.

The regime fails not only because it is corrupt, but because it follows a false intellectual basis, which is the capitalist system, which makes money the focus of all state policies. Capitalism is based on absolute freedom of ownership, and allows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few who own the means of production, while the many bear the burden of taxes, prices, and public debt.

Therefore, all so-called "social protection programs" are merely an attempt to beautify the brutal face of capitalism, and to prolong the life of an unjust system that takes into account the rich and collects from the poor. Instead of addressing the root of the disease; i.e., the monopoly of wealth and the dependence of the economy on international institutions, it is sufficient to distribute crumbs of cash aid, which do not alleviate poverty or preserve dignity.

Care is not a favor from the ruler to the ruled, but a legitimate duty, and a responsibility for which God will hold him accountable in this world and the hereafter. What is happening today is a deliberate neglect of people's affairs, and an abandonment of the duty of care in favor of conditional loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The state has become an intermediary between the poor and the foreign creditor, imposing taxes, reducing subsidies, and selling public property to cover a swollen deficit created by the capitalist system itself. In all of this, the legitimate concepts that regulate the economy are absent, such as the prohibition of usury, the prevention of the ownership of public wealth by individuals, and the obligation to spend on the people from the treasury of the Muslims.

Islam has presented an integrated economic system that addresses poverty at its roots, not just with cash support or cosmetic projects. This system is based on fixed legitimate foundations, the most prominent of which are:

1- Prohibiting usury and usurious debts that shackle the state and drain its resources. By eliminating usury, the dependence of the economy on international institutions will disappear, and the financial sovereignty of the nation will be restored.

2- Making ownership three types:

Individual ownership: such as houses, shops, and private farms...

Public ownership: includes major wealth such as oil, gas, minerals, and water...

State ownership: such as fay' lands, rikaz, and kharaj...

With this distribution, justice is achieved, as a small group is prevented from monopolizing the nation's resources.

3- Guaranteeing sufficiency for every individual of the people: The state guarantees for every person in its care their basic needs of food, clothing, and housing. If they are unable to work, the treasury must spend on them.

4- Zakat and mandatory spending: Zakat is not a charity, but an obligation, collected by the state and spent in its legitimate channels for the poor, the needy, and the debtors. It is an effective distribution tool that returns money to the cycle of life in society.

Along with stimulating productive work and preventing exploitation, and urging investment of resources in real beneficial projects such as heavy and military industries, not in speculation, luxury real estate and fictitious projects. In addition to adjusting prices with real supply and demand, not with monopoly or floatation.

The Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood is the only one capable of applying these provisions practically, because it is built on the basis of Islamic creed, and its goal is to care for people's affairs, not to collect their money. Under the Khilafah, there is no usury or conditional loans, and no sale of public wealth to foreigners, but resources are managed in a way that achieves the interest of the nation, and the treasury finances health care, education, and public facilities from state resources, kharaj, anfal, and public property.

As for the poor, their basic needs are guaranteed individually, not through temporary charity but as a guaranteed legitimate right. Therefore, fighting poverty in Islam is not a political slogan, but an integrated system of life that establishes justice, prevents injustice, and returns wealth to its people.

Between the official discourse and the lived reality is a huge distance that is not hidden from anyone. While the government boasts of its "giant" projects and the "real launch," millions of Egyptians live below the poverty line, suffering from high prices, unemployment, and a lack of hope. The truth is that this suffering will not disappear as long as Egypt continues on the path of capitalism, surrendering its economy to usurers and submitting to the policies of international institutions.

The crises and problems of Egypt are human problems and not material ones, and they relate to legitimate rulings that show how to deal with them and treat them on the basis of Islam, and the solutions are easier than turning a blind eye, but they need a sincere administration that has a free will that wants to walk in the right path and truly wants good for Egypt and its people, and then this administration must review all the contracts that were previously concluded and that are concluded with all the companies that monopolize the assets of the country and what is of its public ownership, and at the forefront are companies exploring for gas, oil, gold and the rest of the minerals and wealth, and expel all those companies because they are originally colonial companies plundering the wealth of the country, then formulate a new covenant based on enabling people to access the country's wealth and establishing or leasing companies that are based on producing wealth from the sources of oil, gas, gold and other minerals and redistribute these wealth to the people again, then people will be able to cultivate the dead land that the state will enable them to exploit with their right in it, and they will also be able to manufacture what must be manufactured to raise the economy of Egypt and suffice its people, and the state will support them in this way, and all this is not a figment of the imagination or impossible to happen or a project that we present for experimentation that may succeed or fail, but it is legitimate rulings that are necessary and binding on the state and the people, so the state may not give up the wealth of the country that is owned by the people under the pretext of contracts approved and supported by unjust international laws, and it may not prevent people from it, but it must cut off every hand that extends plundering to the wealth of the people, this is what Islam offers and must be implemented, but it is not applied in isolation from the rest of the systems of Islam, but it is only applied through the Rashidun Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood, this state whose concern and call for is carried by Hizb ut-Tahrir and calls on Egypt and its people, people and army, to work with it for its sake, may God write the conquest from Him, so we see it a reality that honors Islam and its people, O God, sooner rather than later.

﴿If the people of the towns had but believed and been righteous, We would have opened for them blessings from heaven and earth.﴾

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saeed Fadl

Member of the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Egypt