Trump's Initiative Deception: Getting Out of the Gaza Predicament by Crushing the Iranian Regime
Reordering Priorities While Maintaining Goals
Such news, in its brevity, is full of calamities that are difficult to enumerate, due to the abundance of its scandals, whether in terms of misleading minds and foolish understandings, or in terms of the degradation of souls and the acceptance of humiliation. Trump chose the rulers of Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, and the Emirates and invited them to the meeting, and they complied. And why did he invite them? To discuss stopping the war on Gaza! As if he were a just ruler who really wants peace! He boasted that he is a man of peace and a man of stopping wars, and that he wants to stop the war on Gaza, and that Hamas is the one refusing that, and has previously rejected all his initiatives to stop it. And they listen like a submissive confessor, even though the whole world knows that he, his administration, and his country stand behind all the massacres in Gaza, and drop all initiatives and projects to stop the war in the Security Council and elsewhere.
It is no longer hidden that the war on Gaza is America's war, as it supports it with everything it can. It stands behind the Jewish entity in all its attacks on Yemen, Lebanon, Iran, Syria, and Qatar. And everything it claims to the contrary is lies and deception. One of the calamities is that it repeats its deception with the same lies and the same promises, and these and their like respond, kneeling before Trump and his envoys out of fear and greed, begging for his intervention to pressure Netanyahu and limit his excesses. In reality, they are in complete harmony and agreement on what they call the New Middle East.
On the other hand, a question arises here: Why this transformation in Trump to stop the war on Gaza, and to advance an initiative free of the clause to eliminate Hamas, unlike all previous initiatives from the beginning of the war to today?
Whatever the opinions on this transformation, it is not without deception. The closest entry point to understanding this transformation is that this meeting came on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly conference, in which the words of most countries were against the Jewish entity and its massacres and its supporters in Gaza and the region, that is, against the United States and Trump. Europe has taken on this trend for more than a year, and France's leadership has become clear, and it has taken the initiative with Saudi Arabia to hold this conference on September 22, 2025, with the aim of enshrining the two-state solution and its requirements. This conference and the international and popular positions in the world against the massacres of the Jews put pressure on America, pushing it to reconsider its plans. But were these pressures enough to make America modify its policy in Gaza? In reality, they are not enough. The objections to the massacres of the Jews and America's positions, and the attempts to stop the war, are not new, but they would not have had an effect without other factors.
Among these factors is the almost unanimous agreement of Europe and its beginning to take successive measures against the Jewish entity, and its standing in the face of America's policy in Gaza and the West Bank. Also, there's the huge fleet heading to break the siege on Gaza, and supported by European countries.
Among them is the discontent of the Arab countries and others in the region, and their fear of America's policy after it became likely that it is not serious about the issue of the two-state solution, and that its strategy for the region (the New Middle East) does not take this solution into consideration, and instead gives the Jewish entity free rein to be the region's policeman and ruler by America's command, which was practically confirmed after the Jewish strike on Doha, and terrified all the rulers of the region of America and this immoral entity. This strike had wide international repercussions, including the Arab-Islamic summit in Doha on September 15, 2025, which alerted America that its policy is hasty, and is pushing the region, sooner or later, to search for alternative options, even if in secret and with trepidation.
Among the important and perhaps decisive factors is the failure of America and the Jewish entity in Gaza. Two years have passed since this attack without avail, but rather the Jewish army has become weaker and more incapacitated because of it. It does not achieve on the ground anything but atrocities that incite the world against their entity and against America.
These factors are sufficient to push the United States to reconsider its strategy and modify what is not appropriate. It can be said that Europe's escalating position in opposing America's policy in Gaza, in addition to the shock that struck the countries of the region and the Islamic countries, accelerated the move towards this transformation.
As for what the transformation is, it becomes clear from following America's previous initiatives, which the Americans say have reached 27 initiatives, they all stipulated the elimination of Hamas, which means the death of the initiative before it is born, which is the desire of America and the Jews. As for the initiative mentioned now, it is free of this clause. This means the possibility of America's seriousness, but not guaranteeing its success.
Here a question arises, does America really want to end the war in Gaza, even though this is a declaration of failure for it and the Jewish entity, and an abandonment of their plan for Gaza, and its outcome is going to the two-state solution? The answer: No, this transformation and direction does not indicate that, and the natural thing is that what it wants is an adjustment in the plans due to the setback, while maintaining the established goals.
What indicates the likely alternative plan appeared in the interview of the US Special Envoy to Syria, Thomas Barack, on Sky News on September 22, 2025, youtube.com/watch?v=Yppp_DKa0sw. He said that the Lebanese government had failed to withdraw Hezbollah's weapons, and that the Jewish entity was the only one left to take care of this matter, and the situation in Lebanon and Gaza is complicated, and there is no way to solve the problem in the Arab and Islamic region except by force, because the region is not able to accept submission to America's hegemony or surrender to its will. He exaggerated in a way that indicated annoyance due to his failure, and said that there is no expression (submission) in their dictionary, so they must be subdued by force, by cutting off the head of the snake, that is, Iran. He said: "Hezbollah is our enemy, and Iran is our enemy, and we need to cut off the heads of these snakes and cut off the flow of money, and this is the only way to stop Hezbollah." In response to a question as to whether there is a need for another decisive strike against Iran to cut off the head of the snake? He said: "This regime is very good at postponing things and waiting, because it thinks Obama will return... It seems that Israel is moving towards solving the whole problem, and the problem is Gaza. I imagine that controlling Gaza, controlling Hezbollah, and controlling the Houthis will not be useful if the Iranian regime is not controlled."
Tom Barack's words may explain the concessions that Trump is making regarding Gaza, as temporary to gather the capabilities and direct them towards the head of the snake. After that, they will go back to violating agreements and achieving goals in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and others, and imposing the New Middle East project. Although this is very difficult, it seems that it has become an urgent need for America, due to the rise of competitors, the proliferation of predicaments, the continuation of failure, the closure of exits, and, before all of the above, the intractability of political Islam.
﴿And let not those who disbelieve think they will escape. Indeed, they will not weaken [ Allah ].﴾
Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir
Mahmoud Abdel-Hadi