There is No Solution to the Sudan Issue Except Ruling by Islam
There is No Solution to the Sudan Issue Except Ruling by Islam

Since its (independence) on January 1, 1956, Sudan has witnessed a series of military coups, the first of which was the failed attempt led by Ismail Kabida, who tried to overthrow the first national government headed by Ismail al-Azhari, followed by the first successful coup led by Lieutenant General Ibrahim Abboud in November 1958 against the elected al-Azhari government.

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 01, 2025

There is No Solution to the Sudan Issue Except Ruling by Islam

There is No Solution to the Sudan Issue Except Ruling by Islam

Since its (independence) on January 1, 1956, Sudan has witnessed a series of military coups, the first of which was the failed attempt led by Ismail Kabida, who tried to overthrow the first national government headed by Ismail al-Azhari, followed by the first successful coup led by Lieutenant General Ibrahim Abboud in November 1958 against the elected al-Azhari government.

In May 1969, the most famous coup in the history of Sudan took place, led by Brigadier General Jaafar al-Nimeiri and a group of communist and nationalist officers, and his rule lasted for 16 years. He was subjected to several coup attempts, the first of which took place in 1971, and in 1975 Nimeiri succeeded in eliminating a coup attempt against him, in which the coup plotters were executed. Attempts to overthrow Jaafar al-Nimeiri continued, as in July 1976 a violent coup attempt took place, and battles took place in the streets of the capital, Khartoum, between government forces and the coup plotters, which ended in the failure of the attempt and the execution of its leader. But after all these challenges, in April 1985, Nimeiri's rule did not withstand a popular uprising, as he was removed from power and Field Marshal Abdul Rahman Swar al-Dahab - who was then Minister of Defense - assumed the presidency of a transitional military council, and he was the only one in the history of the country and the region who fulfilled his promise and handed over power after a year to an elected government headed by Sadiq al-Mahdi. However, it - too - in 1989 was subjected to a military coup led by Omar al-Bashir, who assumed the position of Chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council for National Salvation, and also held the position of Prime Minister and President of the Sudanese Republic together.

A series of coups experienced by the people of Sudan made them taste the woes of wars and instability. These conditions continued during the era of Omar al-Bashir, who ruled Sudan with an iron fist for thirty years, during which he made people taste the bitterness of injustice and tyranny, in addition to bringing the country into a severe economic crisis. In 1999, he ordered the dissolution of the National Assembly (Parliament) and declared a state of emergency in the country following a power struggle between him and the Speaker of Parliament, Hassan al-Turabi. The rebellion movements against al-Bashir and his government continued, and the response to them was repression and persecution; for example, in 2004, army forces moved to Darfur in western Sudan to eliminate the rebellion movement that accused the central authority in Khartoum of marginalizing the region, and hundreds of thousands of Darfur residents fled to neighboring Chad: deteriorating political conditions described by the then US Secretary of State Colin Powell as "genocide."

In 2005, the government signed a peace agreement with the southern rebels, but it was violated and war crimes were committed during it, and a new constitution was issued giving a large degree of self-rule to the south, and as a result, the south actually seceded in 2011 after a popular referendum.

After the secession of the south, the government lost the oil it was producing from its fields, and the south monopolized three-quarters of the total output, and Sudan was unable to meet its fuel needs, thus losing a major source of foreign exchange. Most economic statistics have confirmed that 90% of Sudanese live below the poverty line and that the unemployment rate exceeds 60%. Inflation in June 2012 reached about 37%, with a sharp rise in all prices of goods and services, coupled with a significant deterioration in individuals' income. In return, the government claims that it will begin to apply Islamic Sharia "hudud" more strictly after the secession of South Sudan. The First Vice President affirmed in his speech during the fourth session of the Islamic Jurisprudence Academy that Omar al-Bashir is keen for the Academy to proceed on the path of scientific approach and investigate objectivity and "arrange priorities and derive Sharia rulings without favoritism." So what priorities is he talking about? The government, which is rushing to apply hudud to people who have not been provided with the simplest means of living and have made them live in poverty and need, finds no problem in permitting its dealings with usurious loans (due to the inadequacy of the state's financial resources and its need for external financing), as it claims.

The government has pursued a failed financial policy, withholding liquidity from people and failing to provide them with bread flour, which has caused the people of Sudan to be unable to obtain basic needs and provide the simplest means of life... in addition to the health situation, which is disastrous; in one of the statistics published by the "Sudan Now" website in 2018, one in every 20 children in Sudan suffers from malnutrition, and diseases such as malaria and bilharzia are widespread, reaching two million cases!

They raise the slogan of applying Sharia and select from its rulings after molding them to serve their interests and the interests of the West, and they throw the other rulings to the ground; there is no rule by Islam in the politics of the country and no sovereignty, they are followers of the disbelieving West as they rely on it and borrow money from it and issue fatwas about that and legalize it, and they allow it to interfere in the affairs of their country and determine the fate of their people... and there is no care for the people and no guarantee, the people of Sudan are starving and living in abject poverty... so what Sharia are they applying? Islam is a whole that cannot be divided with its rulings and hudud, it is applied as a system of life that God has approved for His servants, and no servant has the right to select some of it and leave the other. Whoever chooses to apply Sharia must implement all of its rulings, without missing anything.

Then, the lifting of subsidies on bread and fuel, the high prices of basic commodities, the scarcity of many goods, the continuation of financial policies dictated by the International Monetary Fund, and other factors, and the deterioration of the health situation had a profound impact on the feeling of all the people of Sudan of dissatisfaction with this livelihood, and a state of discontent spread in the country that escalated and worsened day after day. The corruption of the Omar al-Bashir regime and its involvement in manipulating state funds became clear, as a report issued by the International Financial Integrity Organization revealed that this regime had concealed about $31 billion of Sudanese exports between 2012 and 2018. The government announced that the country's exports amounted to $65 billion during the aforementioned period, while 70 countries of Sudan's trading partners estimated their imports at about $96 billion, so there were protests and demonstrations and the fires of revolution broke out against this government in all cities of Sudan, and it was overthrown in 2019 after the Ministry of Defense announced that al-Bashir had stepped down from his position and that the army would manage the affairs of the country.

Despite the overthrow of al-Bashir's rule, the suffering of the people of Sudan is still continuing in light of conflicts based on Western countries and supervised by their organizations, and this suffering will not stop and will not have a limit unless all the rulings of Sharia are applied and the country is ruled by those who do not fear God for the blame of a critic and do not rely on an enemy, but make raising the banner of Islam their goal and implementing its rulings their aim.

#SudanCrisis           #SudanCrisis

Written for the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

Zeina al-Samet

More from null

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Do not be deceived by names, for the essence lies in actions, not lineage

Every time we are presented with a "new symbol" with Muslim roots or Eastern features, many Muslims cheer, and hopes are built on an illusion called "political representation" in an infidel system that does not recognize Islam as a ruling system, a creed, or a law.

We all remember the overwhelming joy that swept through the feelings of many when Obama won in 2008. He is the son of Kenya, and he has a Muslim father! Here, some imagined that Islam and Muslims had become close to American influence, but Obama was one of the most harmful presidents to Muslims. He destroyed Libya, contributed to the tragedy of Syria, and ignited Afghanistan and Iraq with his planes and soldiers. Rather, he was the blood shedder in Yemen through his tools, and his era was a continuation of a systematic hostility against the nation.

Today, the scene is repeated, but with new names. Zohran Mamdani is celebrated because he is a Muslim, an immigrant, and a young man, as if he is the savior! But only a few look at his political and intellectual positions. This man is a strong supporter of homosexuals, participates in their activities, and considers their deviation a human right!

What a shame that people pin their hopes on this?! Wasn't it a repetition of the same political and intellectual disappointment that the nation has fallen into time and time again?! Yes, because it is captivated by appearance, not essence! Deceived by smiles, and deals with emotion, not creed, with names, not concepts, and with symbols, not principles!

This fascination with appearances and names is the result of the absence of legitimate political awareness, because Islam is not measured by origin, name, or race, but by commitment to the principle of Islam in its entirety; as a system, creed, and law. A Muslim who does not rule by Islam or support it has no value, but rather submits to the infidel capitalist system and justifies infidelity and deviations in the name of "freedom".

Let all Muslims who rejoiced in his victory and thought that he was a seed of good or the beginning of revival know that revival does not come from within systems of disbelief, nor with their tools, nor through their ballot boxes, nor under the ceiling of their constitutions.

Whoever presents himself through the democratic system, swears to respect its laws, then defends and celebrates homosexuality, and calls for what angers God, is not a supporter of Islam or a hope for the nation, but rather a tool for polishing and diluting, and a false representation that does not advance or delay anything.

The so-called political successes in the West for some personalities with Islamic names are nothing but crumbs presented as painkillers to the nation, to be told: Look, change is possible through our systems.

 So what is the reality of this "representation"?

The West does not open the doors of rule to Islam, but only opens them to those who identify with its values and ideas. Anyone who enters their system must accept their constitution and their man-made laws, and renounce the rule of Islam. If he agrees to that, he becomes an acceptable model, but the true Muslim is rejected by them from his roots.

So who is Zohran Mamdani? And why is this illusion being created?

He is a person who carries a Muslim name but adopts a deviant agenda that is completely contrary to the nature of Islam, from supporting homosexuals and promoting what is called their "rights". He is a living example of how the West makes its models: Muslim in name, secular in reality, a servant of the Western liberal agenda, nothing more. Rather, to distract the nation from its true path. Instead of demanding the state of Islam and the Caliphate, it is preoccupied with parliamentary seats and positions in systems of disbelief! Instead of heading to liberate Palestine, it waits for someone to "defend Gaza" from inside the American Congress or the European Parliament!

The truth of the matter is that this is a distortion of the true path of change, which is the establishment of the Rightly Guided Caliphate on the Prophetic method, which raises the banner of Islam, establishes the law of God, and unites the nation behind one Caliph who is fought from behind and feared.

So do not be deceived by names, and do not rejoice in those who belong to you in form and disagree with you in content, for not everyone who bears the name Saeed, Ali, or Zohran is on the path of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Know that change does not come from within the parliaments of disbelief, but from the armies of the nation that have come to move, and from its conscious youth who work day and night to turn the tables on the West and its aides and its treacherous followers in the lands of Islam and the Muslims.

Muslims will not rise through democratic elections or through Western ballot boxes, but through a real renaissance based on the Islamic creed, by establishing the Rightly Guided Caliphate that restores Islam's status, Muslims' dignity, and shatters the illusions of democracy.

Do not be deceived by names, and do not pin your hopes on individuals in systems of disbelief, but return to your great project: the resumption of Islamic life, for this alone is the path to glory, victory, and empowerment.

The scene is a humiliating repetition of old tragedies: false symbols, loyalty to Western regimes, and deviation from the path of Islam. Everyone who applauds this path is misleading the nation. Return to the Caliphate project, and do not let the enemies of Islam make your leaders and representatives for you. Glory is not in the seats of democracy, but in the saddle of the Caliphate, for which Hizb ut-Tahrir works and warns the nation against this intellectual and political decline. There is no salvation for us except with the state of the Caliphate, which does not allow Muslims to be ruled by those who profess a religion other than Islam, nor by those who justify deviance and perversion, nor by those who legislate for people other than what God has revealed.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Abdul Mahmoud Al-Ameri - Yemen Province

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality: The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Egypt Between Government Slogans and Bitter Reality

The Full Truth About Poverty and Capitalist Policies

Al-Ahram Gate reported on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, that the Egyptian Prime Minister, in a speech delivered on behalf of the President at the Second World Summit for Social Development in Doha, Qatar, said that Egypt is implementing a comprehensive approach to eliminate poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including "multidimensional poverty."

For years, official speeches in Egypt have rarely been devoid of phrases such as "a comprehensive approach to eliminating poverty" and "the real launch of the Egyptian economy." Officials repeat these slogans at conferences and events, accompanied by glossy images of investment projects, hotels, and resorts. But the reality, as evidenced by international reports, is quite different. Poverty in Egypt remains a deeply rooted, and even worsening, phenomenon, despite repeated government promises of improvement and renaissance.

According to reports by UNICEF, ESCWA, and the World Food Programme for 2024 and 2025, about one in five Egyptians lives in multidimensional poverty, meaning they are deprived of more than one aspect of basic life, such as education, health, housing, work, and services. The data also confirms that more than 49% of families suffer from difficulties in obtaining sufficient food, a shocking figure that reflects the depth of the living crisis.

As for financial poverty, i.e., low income compared to the costs of living, it has risen sharply as a result of successive waves of inflation that have eroded people's wages, efforts, and savings, until a large percentage of Egyptians are below the financial poverty line despite their constant work.

While the government talks about initiatives such as "Takaful and Karama" and "Decent Life," international figures reveal that these programs have not radically changed the structure of poverty, but have been limited to temporary palliatives similar to a drop poured into the desert. The Egyptian countryside, where more than half of the population lives, still suffers from poor services, a lack of decent job opportunities, and dilapidated infrastructure. The ESCWA report confirms that deprivation in the countryside is several times greater than in the cities, which indicates poor distribution of wealth and chronic neglect of the peripheries.

When the Prime Minister thanks the citizen "who has endured with the government the measures of economic reform," he is in fact acknowledging the existence of real suffering resulting from these policies. However, this acknowledgment is not followed by a change in approach, but rather a continuation on the same capitalist path that caused the crisis.

The alleged reform that began in 2016 with the "floatation" program, raising subsidies, and increasing taxes, was not a reform but rather a burdening of the poor with the cost of debts and deficits. At a time when officials are talking about "the launch," huge investments are going to luxury real estate and tourism projects that serve the owners of capital, while millions of young people find no opportunities for work or housing. Indeed, many of these projects, such as the Alam El Roum area in Matrouh, whose investments are estimated at $29 billion, are foreign capitalist partnerships that acquire land and wealth and turn them into a source of profit for investors, not a source of livelihood for the people.

The regime fails not only because it is corrupt, but because it follows a false intellectual basis, which is the capitalist system, which makes money the focus of all state policies. Capitalism is based on absolute freedom of ownership, and allows the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the few who own the means of production, while the many bear the burden of taxes, prices, and public debt.

Therefore, all so-called "social protection programs" are merely an attempt to beautify the brutal face of capitalism, and to prolong the life of an unjust system that takes into account the rich and collects from the poor. Instead of addressing the root of the disease; i.e., the monopoly of wealth and the dependence of the economy on international institutions, it is sufficient to distribute crumbs of cash aid, which do not alleviate poverty or preserve dignity.

Care is not a favor from the ruler to the ruled, but a legitimate duty, and a responsibility for which God will hold him accountable in this world and the hereafter. What is happening today is a deliberate neglect of people's affairs, and an abandonment of the duty of care in favor of conditional loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The state has become an intermediary between the poor and the foreign creditor, imposing taxes, reducing subsidies, and selling public property to cover a swollen deficit created by the capitalist system itself. In all of this, the legitimate concepts that regulate the economy are absent, such as the prohibition of usury, the prevention of the ownership of public wealth by individuals, and the obligation to spend on the people from the treasury of the Muslims.

Islam has presented an integrated economic system that addresses poverty at its roots, not just with cash support or cosmetic projects. This system is based on fixed legitimate foundations, the most prominent of which are:

1- Prohibiting usury and usurious debts that shackle the state and drain its resources. By eliminating usury, the dependence of the economy on international institutions will disappear, and the financial sovereignty of the nation will be restored.

2- Making ownership three types:

Individual ownership: such as houses, shops, and private farms...

Public ownership: includes major wealth such as oil, gas, minerals, and water...

State ownership: such as fay' lands, rikaz, and kharaj...

With this distribution, justice is achieved, as a small group is prevented from monopolizing the nation's resources.

3- Guaranteeing sufficiency for every individual of the people: The state guarantees for every person in its care their basic needs of food, clothing, and housing. If they are unable to work, the treasury must spend on them.

4- Zakat and mandatory spending: Zakat is not a charity, but an obligation, collected by the state and spent in its legitimate channels for the poor, the needy, and the debtors. It is an effective distribution tool that returns money to the cycle of life in society.

Along with stimulating productive work and preventing exploitation, and urging investment of resources in real beneficial projects such as heavy and military industries, not in speculation, luxury real estate and fictitious projects. In addition to adjusting prices with real supply and demand, not with monopoly or floatation.

The Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood is the only one capable of applying these provisions practically, because it is built on the basis of Islamic creed, and its goal is to care for people's affairs, not to collect their money. Under the Khilafah, there is no usury or conditional loans, and no sale of public wealth to foreigners, but resources are managed in a way that achieves the interest of the nation, and the treasury finances health care, education, and public facilities from state resources, kharaj, anfal, and public property.

As for the poor, their basic needs are guaranteed individually, not through temporary charity but as a guaranteed legitimate right. Therefore, fighting poverty in Islam is not a political slogan, but an integrated system of life that establishes justice, prevents injustice, and returns wealth to its people.

Between the official discourse and the lived reality is a huge distance that is not hidden from anyone. While the government boasts of its "giant" projects and the "real launch," millions of Egyptians live below the poverty line, suffering from high prices, unemployment, and a lack of hope. The truth is that this suffering will not disappear as long as Egypt continues on the path of capitalism, surrendering its economy to usurers and submitting to the policies of international institutions.

The crises and problems of Egypt are human problems and not material ones, and they relate to legitimate rulings that show how to deal with them and treat them on the basis of Islam, and the solutions are easier than turning a blind eye, but they need a sincere administration that has a free will that wants to walk in the right path and truly wants good for Egypt and its people, and then this administration must review all the contracts that were previously concluded and that are concluded with all the companies that monopolize the assets of the country and what is of its public ownership, and at the forefront are companies exploring for gas, oil, gold and the rest of the minerals and wealth, and expel all those companies because they are originally colonial companies plundering the wealth of the country, then formulate a new covenant based on enabling people to access the country's wealth and establishing or leasing companies that are based on producing wealth from the sources of oil, gas, gold and other minerals and redistribute these wealth to the people again, then people will be able to cultivate the dead land that the state will enable them to exploit with their right in it, and they will also be able to manufacture what must be manufactured to raise the economy of Egypt and suffice its people, and the state will support them in this way, and all this is not a figment of the imagination or impossible to happen or a project that we present for experimentation that may succeed or fail, but it is legitimate rulings that are necessary and binding on the state and the people, so the state may not give up the wealth of the country that is owned by the people under the pretext of contracts approved and supported by unjust international laws, and it may not prevent people from it, but it must cut off every hand that extends plundering to the wealth of the people, this is what Islam offers and must be implemented, but it is not applied in isolation from the rest of the systems of Islam, but it is only applied through the Rashidun Khilafah state on the method of Prophethood, this state whose concern and call for is carried by Hizb ut-Tahrir and calls on Egypt and its people, people and army, to work with it for its sake, may God write the conquest from Him, so we see it a reality that honors Islam and its people, O God, sooner rather than later.

﴿If the people of the towns had but believed and been righteous, We would have opened for them blessings from heaven and earth.﴾

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Saeed Fadl

Member of the Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Egypt