مع الحديث الشريف - إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ
مع الحديث الشريف - إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ

 نحييكم جميعا أيها الأحبة المستمعون في كل مكان في حلقة جديدة من برنامجكم مع الحديث الشريف ونبدأ بخير تحية فالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: "إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ وَإِذَا حَكَمَ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْرٌ"

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 11, 2020

مع الحديث الشريف - إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ

مع الحديث الشريف 

إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ

 نحييكم جميعا أيها الأحبة المستمعون في كل مكان في حلقة جديدة من برنامجكم مع الحديث الشريف ونبدأ بخير تحية فالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته،

عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: "إِذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ وَإِذَا حَكَمَ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْرٌ"


جاء في صحيحِ مسلمٍ بشرحِ النَّوَويّ


قَوْلُهُ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: (إذَا حَكَمَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ, وَإِذَا حَكَمَ فَاجْتَهَدَ ثُمَّ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْر)


قَالَ الْعُلَمَاءُ: أَجْمَعَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ عَلَى أَنَّ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ فِي حَاكِمٍ عَالِمٍ أَهْلٍ لِلْحُكْمِ, فَإِنْ أَصَابَ فَلَهُ أَجْرَانِ: أَجْرٌ بِاجْتِهَادِهِ, وَأَجْرٌ بِإِصَابَتِهِ, وَإِنْ أَخْطَأَ فَلَهُ أَجْرٌ بِاجْتِهَادِهِ.


وَفِي الْحَدِيثِ مَحْذُوفٌ تَقْدِيرُهُ: إِذَا أَرَادَ الْحَاكِمُ فَاجْتَهَدَ, قَالُوا: فَأَمَّا مَنْ لَيْسَ بِأَهْلٍ لِلْحُكْمِ فَلَا يَحِلُّ لَهُ الْحُكْمُ, فَإِنْ حَكَمَ فَلَا أَجْرَ لَهُ بَلْ هُوَ آثِمٌ, وَلَا يَنْفُذُ حُكْمُهُ, سَوَاءٌ وَافَقَ الْحَقَّ أَمْ لَا; لِأَنَّ إِصَابَتَهُ اِتِّفَاقِيَّةً لَيْسَتْ صَادِرَةً عَنْ أَصْلٍ شَرْعِيٍّ فَهُوَ عَاصٍ فِي جَمِيعِ أَحْكَامِهِ, سَوَاءٌ وَافَقَ الصَّوَابَ أَمْ لَا, وَهِيَ مَرْدُودَةٌ كُلُّهَا وَلَا يُعْذَرُ فِي شَيْءٍ مِنْ ذَلِكَ, وَقَدْ جَاءَ فِي الْحَدِيثِ فِي السُّنَ " الْقُضَاةُ ثَلَاثَةٌ: قَاضٍ فِي الْجَنَّةِ, وَاثْنَانِ فِي النَّار, قَاضٍ عَرَفَ الْحَقَّ فَقَضَى بِهِ فَهُوَ فِي الْجَنَّة, وَقَاضٍ عَرَفَ الْحَقَّ فَقَضَى بِخِلَافِهِ فَهُوَ فِي النَّار, وَقَاضٍ قَضَى عَلَى جَهْلٍ فَهُوَ فِي النَّار", وَقَدْ اخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاءُ فِي أَنَّ كُلَّ مُجْتَهِدٍ مُصِيبٌ أَمْ الْمُصِيبُ وَاحِد, وَهُوَ مَنْ وَافَقَ الْحُكْمَ الَّذِي عِنْدَ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى وَالْآخَرُ مُخْطِئٌ لَا إِثْمَ عَلَيْهِ لِعُذْرِهِ؟ وَالْأَصَحُّ عِنْدَ الشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَصْحَابِهِ أَنَّ الْمُصِيبَ وَاحِد, وَقَدْ احْتَجَّتْ الطَّائِفَتَانِ بِهَذَا الْحَدِيث, وَأَمَّا الْأَوَّلُونَ الْقَائِلُونَ: ( كُلُّ مُجْتَهِدٍ مُصِيبٌ) فَقَالُوا: قَدْ جُعِلَ لِلْمُجْتَهِدِ أَجْرٌ فَلَوْلَا إِصَابَتُهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ أَجْر, وَأَمَّا الْآخَرُونَ فَقَالُوا: سَمَّاهُ مُخْطِئًا, لَوْ كَانَ مُصِيبًا لَمْ يُسَمِّهِ مُخْطِئًا, وَأَمَّا الْأَجْرُ فَإِنَّهُ حَصَلَ لَهُ عَلَى تَعَبِهِ فِي الِاجْتِهَاد, قَالَ الْأَوَّلُونَ: إِنَّمَا سَمَّاهُ مُخْطِئًا لِأَنَّهُ مَحْمُولٌ عَلَى مَنْ أَخْطَأَ النَّصَّ أَوْ اِجْتَهَدَ فِيمَا لَا يَسُوَّغُ فِيهِ الِاجْتِهَادُ كَالْمُجْمَعِ عَلَيْهِ وَغَيْرِه, وَهَذَا الِاخْتِلَافُ إِنَّمَا هُوَ فِي الِاجْتِهَادِ فِي الْفُرُوع, فَأَمَّا أُصُولُ التَّوْحِيدِ فَالْمُصِيبُ فِيهَا وَاحِدٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ مَنْ يُعْتَدُّ بِهِ, وَلَمْ يُخَالِفْ إِلَّا عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ الْحَسَنِ الْعَبْتَرِيَّ وَدَاوُدَ الظَّاهِرِيَّ فَصَوَّبَا الْمُجْتَهِدِينَ فِي ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا, قَالَ الْعُلَمَاء: الظَّاهِرُ أَنَّهُمَا أَرَادَ الْمُجْتَهِدِينَ مِنْ الْمُسْلِمِينَ دُونَ الْكُفَّارِ وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم .

وجاء في فتحِ الباري بشرحِ صحيحِ البُخاريّ


قولُهُ (إذا حَكَمَ الحاكِمُ فاجتهَدَ ثمّ أصاب)


في روايةِ أحْمَدَ "فأصابَ" قال القرطبيُّ: هكذا وَقَعَ في الحديثِ بدَأَ بالحُكْمِ قبلَ الاجتهاد, والأمرُ بالعكسِ فإِنَّ الاجتهادَ يتقدَّمُ الحُكْمَ إذْ لا يجوزُ الحُكْمُ قبلَ الاجتهادِ اتّفاقاً, لكنَّ التّقديرَ في قولِهِ "إذا حَكَمَ" إذا أرادَ أنْ يَحْكُمَ فعندَ ذلك يجتهِدُ, قالَ ويؤيِّدُهُ أنَّ أهلَ الأصولِ قالوا: يجبُ على المجتهدِ أنْ يُجَدِّدَ النّظرَ عندَ وُقوعِ النّازلَة, ولا يَعْتَمِدُ على ما تقدَّمَ له لإمكانِ أن يظهَرَ له خِلافُ غيرِهِ. انتهى. ويُحْتَمَلُ أنْ تكونَ الفاءُ تفسيريّةً لا تعقيبيّةً وقولُهُ "فأصابَ" أي صادَفَ ما في نفسِ الأمرِ مِنْ حُكْمِ اللهِ تعالى.


مستمعينا الكرام:


الاجتهادُ في اللغةِ هو استفراغُ الوُسعِ في تحقيقِ أمرٍ من الأمورِ مُستَلْزِمٌ للكُلْفَةِ والمشقّة. وأمّا في اصطلاحِ الأُصوليّينَ فمخصوصٌ باستفراغِ الوُسعِ في طَلَبِ الظّنِّ بشيءٍ من الأحكامِ الشرعيّةِ على وجهٍ يُحِسُّ من النَّفْسِ العَجْزَ عن المَزيدِ فيه. والاجتهادُ فرضٌ على الكِفايةِ على المسلمين. ومن الدُّروسِ المُستفادَةِ من هذا الحديثِ الشّريفِ وشرحِهِ الذي تقدَّم:


أوّلاً: أنه يجبُ أنْ يكونَ الحاكمُ عالماً وأهلاً للحُكْم. وَلِيَكُونَ كذلكَ يجبُ أنْ يتوفَّرَ فيه شرطان اثنانِ وهما توفُّرُ المعارفِ اللُّغَوِيَّةِ والمعارفِ الشرعيّة، وإلاّ أَثِمَ الحاكِمُ لِحُكْمِهِ بغيرِ عِلم.


ثانيا: أنّ الاجتهادَ لا يكونُ في ما وردَ به نصٌّ شرعيٌّ قطعِيُّ الدِّلالةِ كتحريمِ الرِّبا والزِّنا والقَتلِ، بل يكونُ في النُّصوصِ الشرعيّةِ المُجمَلَةِ أو الظّنيّةِ كَحُكْمِ لَمْسِ المرأةِ وحُكمِ الاستنساخِ وغيرِ ذلك.


ثالثا: لا يجوزُ الحُكمُ قبلَ الاجتهاد. فلا يجوزُ اتخاذُ القرارِ في مسألةٍ ما، ثمّ البحثُ في النُّصوصِ الشرعيّةِ، ولَيُّها أحيانا، للتدليلِ على ما اتَّخَذَ فيه قراراً أصلاً. بل يجبُ فَهْمُ واقعِ المسألةِ ومِنْ ثَمَّ إسقاطُ النُّصوصِ الشرعيّةِ على الواقعِ لِنَخْرُجَ بِحُكْمِ اللهِ في المسألة.

مستمعينا الكرام وإلى حين أن نلقاكم مع حديث نبوي آخر نترككم في رعاية الله والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.

More from null

Abu Wadaha News: Stand and Speech to Foil the Plot to Separate Darfur in Port Sudan

أبو وضاحة شعار

11-14-2025

Abu Wadaha News: Stand and Speech to Foil the Plot to Separate Darfur in Port Sudan

As part of the campaign carried out by Hizb ut-Tahrir / Wilayah Sudan to foil the American plot to separate Darfur, the youth of Hizb ut-Tahrir / Wilayah Sudan, held a stand after Friday prayers, 23 Jumada al-Awwal 1447 AH, corresponding to 11/14/2025 AD, in front of Bashiikh Mosque, in the city of Port Sudan, Deim Medina neighborhood.


Professor Muhammad Jami Abu Ayman - Assistant Official Spokesman of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Wilayah Sudan delivered a speech to the assembled crowd, calling for action to thwart the ongoing plan to separate Darfur, saying: "Frustrate America's plan to separate Darfur as the South was separated, in order to preserve the unity of the Ummah, and Islam has forbidden dividing and tearing this Ummah apart, and made the unity of the Ummah and the State a fateful issue, for which a single measure is taken, life or death, and when this issue fell from its rank, the disbelievers, led by America, and with the help of some Muslims, were able to tear our country apart, and separate South Sudan... and some of us were silent about this great sin, and were covered with negligence and betrayal, so that crime passed! Here is America returning today, to implement the same plan, with the same scenario, to tear Darfur away from the body of Sudan, in what it called the Blood Borders Plan, relying on the secessionists who occupy all of Darfur and have established their alleged state by declaring a parallel government in the city of Nyala; will you let America do that in your country?!"


He then addressed a message to the scholars, the people of Sudan, and the sincere officers in the armed forces to move to liberate the whole of Darfur and prevent secession, and that the opportunity is still available to thwart the enemy's plan and thwart this deceit, and that the radical solution is to establish the Rightly Guided Khilafah on the method of Prophethood, for it alone preserves the Ummah, defends its unity, and establishes the law of its Lord.


Then he concluded his speech by saying: We, your brothers in Hizb ut-Tahrir, have chosen to be with God Almighty, to support God, to believe in Him, and to fulfill the glad tidings of the Messenger of God ﷺ, so come with us, for God is our helper inevitably. God Almighty said: {O you who believe, if you support Allah, He will support you and plant firmly your feet}.


The Media Office of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the Wilayah of Sudan

Source: Abu Wadaha News

The Radar: Babanusa Following in El Fasher's Footsteps

الرادار شعار

13-11-2025

The Radar: Babanusa Following in El Fasher's Footsteps

By Engineer/Hasab Allah Al-Nour

The Rapid Support Forces attacked the city of Babanusa last Sunday, and repeated their attack on Tuesday morning.

El Fasher fell resoundingly, a tragedy that shook the foundations of Sudan and broke the hearts of its people, where innocent blood was shed, children were orphaned, women were widowed, and mothers were bereaved.


With all those tragedies, the negotiations in Washington were not affected in the slightest. On the contrary, the US President's advisor for African and Middle Eastern affairs, Mosaad Boles, stated to Al Jazeera Mubasher on 27/10/2025 that the fall of El Fasher reinforces the division of Sudan and helps the negotiations proceed!


At that pivotal moment, many Sudanese realized that what was happening was just a new chapter in an old plan that the sincere had long warned against, a plan to separate Darfur, which they want to impose with the tools of war, starvation, and destruction.


The circle of rejection of the so-called three-month truce has widened, and voices opposing it have risen, especially after news leaked about the possibility of extending it for another nine months, which practically means the Somalization of Sudan and making division a fait accompli, as is the case in Libya.


When the architects of war failed to silence these voices with enticement, they decided to silence them with intimidation. Thus, the compass of the attack was directed towards Babanusa, to be the scene of repeating the El Fasher scenario; a stifling siege that lasted for two years, the downing of a cargo plane to justify stopping air supply, and simultaneous bombing of Sudanese cities; Omdurman, Atbara, Damazin, Al-Abyad, Umm Barambita, Abu Jubaiha and Al-Abbasiya, as happened during the attack on El Fasher.


The attack on Babanusa began on Sunday and renewed on Tuesday morning, with the Rapid Support Forces using the same methods and means they used in El Fasher. Until the moment of writing these lines, no real movement of the army has been observed to rescue the people of Babanusa, in a painful repetition that almost completely matches the scene of El Fasher before its fall.


If Babanusa falls - God forbid - and the voices rejecting the truce do not subside, the tragedy will be repeated in another city... And so on, until the people of Sudan are forced to accept the truce with humility.


That is the American plan for Sudan as it appears to the eye; so pay attention, people of Sudan, and consider what you are doing, before a new chapter is written on the map of your country, entitled division and loss.


The people of Babanusa, numbering 177,000, as reported on Al-Hadath channel on 10/11/2025, have been completely displaced, wandering aimlessly.


Screaming, wailing, slapping cheeks, and tearing pockets are the traits of women, but the situation requires manhood and courage that denounce evil, take the oppressor in hand, and raise the word of truth, demanding the release of the armies to move to rescue Babanusa, but rather to restore the entire Darfur.


The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: «Indeed, if people see the oppressor and do not stop him, God will soon encompass them with a punishment from Him.» And he said, peace be upon him: «Indeed, if people see evil and do not change it, God will soon encompass them with a punishment.»


It is one of the most severe forms of injustice, and one of the greatest evils, that our people in Babanusa are abandoned as the people of El Fasher were abandoned before.


America, which is seeking to divide Sudan today, is the same one that separated the South before, and seeks to divide Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Libya, and as the people of the Levant say, "the rope is on the jar", until chaos prevails throughout the entire Islamic nation, and God calls us to unity.


God Almighty said: ﴿AND THIS UMMAH OF YOURS IS ONE UMMAH, AND I AM YOUR LORD, SO FEAR ME﴾, and the Prophet ﷺ said: «IF ALLEGIANCE IS PLEDGED TO TWO CALIPHS, KILL THE LATTER OF THEM.» And he said: «There will be events and events, so whoever wants to divide the affairs of this nation while it is all together, strike him with the sword, whoever he may be.» He also said: «Whoever comes to you when your affairs are all united under one man, wanting to break your unity or divide your community, kill him.»


Didn't I convey the message? O God, bear witness. Didn't I convey the message? O God, bear witness. Didn't I convey the message? O God, bear witness.

Source: The Radar