Summary of the Book "Thinking" - Episode Two
Summary of the Book "Thinking" - Episode Two

As for the method of thinking, it is the way the mental process takes place, and it does not change. As for the style of thinking, it is the way required to research something, and it differs according to the reality of the thing. The mental method is named after the mind, and it means a specific approach to research that is followed to reach the nature of the thing by transmitting the sensation of reality to the brain with prior information in order to judge things. It is a way of thinking about everything, whether physics or other things.

0:00 0:00
Speed:
September 23, 2025

Summary of the Book "Thinking" - Episode Two

Summary of the Book "Thinking" - Episode Two

As for the method of thinking, it is the way the mental process takes place, and it does not change. As for the style of thinking, it is the way required to research something, and it differs according to the reality of the thing. The mental method is named after the mind, and it means a specific approach to research that is followed to reach the nature of the thing by transmitting the sensation of reality to the brain with prior information in order to judge things. It is a way of thinking about everything, whether physics or other things. 

It is necessary to differentiate between prior information and prior opinions, and to avoid opinions completely because they lead to errors in perception and interpret information incorrectly. Using the mental method with regard to the existence of something results in a correct and definitive result; because the judgment came through sensation, and sensation does not err in the existence of reality. However, if it is used to judge the thing, the result will be speculative and subject to error; this is because the judgment came from analyzing the sensation of reality with information, but it remains correct until its error becomes clear. For example, beliefs are definitive and relate to the existence of something, while legal rulings are speculative and are a judgment on reality.

After the Industrial Revolution, the Western world called for what is called the scientific method to be the method of thinking, and those impressed by Western culture promoted it, so people began to sanctify the scientific method. 

The scientific method is based on subjecting matter to conditions other than its original conditions, and then observing the matter, conditions, and factors. It is specific to material matters, and requires the researcher to erase from his mind any thought, prior information, or prior belief. The result is scientific and speculative, subject to error, and not definitive. 

Therefore, the scientific method is a style and not a method, and it is specific to tangible material matters, and it is not a basis; because it must have prior information, and this information must have come through a way other than the way of experimentation and observation, because it is done by transmitting reality by sensation, and the information cannot be experimental because it has not yet been obtained, so the prior information must be mental; therefore, the scientific method is not a basis but a branch of the mental method, which is the basis. Likewise, the scientific method assumes that everything that is not tangible does not exist, so there is no existence for jurisprudence, history, angels, or God, because it has not been proven through experimentation and observation, even though the existence of angels is definitive and the existence of God is definitive by the mental method. 

The possibility of error must be noted in the scientific method, and the error has actually occurred in its results, but in any case, it is a correct method for thinking about material matters. Also, this method cannot produce new ideas, but rather infers them. Newly created ideas are taken by the mind directly, such as the existence of God, but knowing that water consists of oxygen is not taken by the mind directly, but was taken from ideas that the mind had previously taken and then experiments were conducted alongside these ideas, but the West, as a result of its sanctification of these ideas, began to apply them to human knowledge. 

As a result of using this method, many errors appeared in communism, including their saying that nature is an indivisible whole, and that it is in a state of constant change due to contradictions, but these contradictions do not exist. They say that living things have contradictions, so they have cells that die and cells that are born, but this is not a contradiction, but rather the weakness of some cells and their death and the production of other cells, provided that dead organisms have dead cells and no cells are born. They thought that contradictions would occur in Europe, but no contradictions occur in it, but rather it is drowning in the capitalist system. 

The West has also mixed between deductive ideas resulting from the mental method and scientific ideas resulting from the scientific method, so they applied the scientific method to humans, and created psychology, which is the repetition of observations on humans at different ages, and they called the repetition of observations science, which is originally not a scientific method. This was a serious error due to the error in applying the scientific method to humans; because the most important thing in the scientific method is experimentation, and this is not possible on humans.

For example, as a result of the error in using this method, the West enumerated human instincts, and concluded that instincts cannot be limited, and they said that there is an instinct of fear and an instinct of courage... and others, so their mistake was that they did not differentiate between the original energy and its manifestations. For example, the instinct of reproduction is an original energy and the inclination towards the mother for her tenderness and towards the woman with desire is a manifestation of its manifestations, and while the original energy cannot be canceled, one of its manifestations can be canceled or suppressed, so the mother's tenderness, for example, may be a deterrent to marriage, or vice versa, and so on. There are three instincts: the instinct of survival: (that is, man has a natural feeling of survival, and he acts towards everything that threatens this survival with boldness or restraint, depending on what he sees, and he has a natural feeling), the second instinct is the instinct of reproduction: (that is, man's extinction threatens his survival, so he wants to preserve it, and it is not the sex instinct; because sex unites humans and animals, but reproduction is for the survival of the human species, and not for the survival of humans and animals, and the inclination towards animals as the inclination of the male towards the male is abnormal and not normal) and the third instinct is religiosity: (that is, when man feels helpless, as if he feels helpless to satisfy the instinct of reproduction or survival, he resorts to God, so it emerges when he feels surrendered, as it emerges in applauding the leader and the hero). However, man has a vital energy, and this energy is divided into energy that must be satisfied, which is organic needs, and energy that requires mere satisfaction, which is instincts. Organic needs relate to the existence of energy, but instincts relate to the needs of energy and not to its existence, so he does not die if he does not satisfy them, but he is disturbed. However, what is said in psychology is also said in education and sociology, and it is the result of the error in applying the scientific method to humans and observing their actions. If they had applied the mental method by transmitting the sensation of human actions and linking them to prior information, they would have been guided to the correct result. However, the scientific method is correct, but only with regard to matter and not with regard to humans, such as history and ideology, so making the scientific method the basis of thinking is an error that leads to judging the non-existence of some sciences, even though they actually exist, and the scientific method is subject to error.

More from null

Reflections on the book: "Elements of the Islamic Psyche" - Episode Fifteen

Reflections on the book: "Elements of the Islamic Psyche"

Prepared by Professor Muhammad Ahmad Al-Nadi

Episode Fifteen

Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and prayers and peace be upon the Imam of the pious, the Master of the Messengers, sent as a mercy to the worlds, our master Muhammad and all his family and companions. Make us with them, and gather us in their company, by your mercy, O Most Merciful of the merciful.

Dear listeners, listeners of the Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir:

Peace, mercy, and blessings of God be upon you. In this episode, we continue our reflections on the book: "Elements of the Islamic Psyche." In order to build the Islamic personality, with attention to the Islamic mentality and the Islamic psyche, we say, with God's help: 

O Muslims:

We said in the last episode: It is also Sunnah for a Muslim to supplicate for his brother behind his back, just as it is Sunnah for him to ask his brother to supplicate for him. It is Sunnah for him to visit him, sit with him, keep in touch with him, and share with him for the sake of God after loving him. It is recommended for a Muslim to meet his brother with what he likes to please him with that. We add in this episode and say: It is recommended for a Muslim to give gifts to his brother, according to the hadith of Abu Hurairah, which was reported by Bukhari in Al-Adab Al-Mufrad, Abu Ya'la in his Musnad, Al-Nasa'i in Al-Kuna, and Ibn Abd Al-Barr in Al-Tamhid. Al-Iraqi said: The chain of narrators is good, and Ibn Hajar said in Al-Talkhis Al-Habir: Its chain of narrators is good, he said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Exchange gifts, you will love one another." 

It is also recommended for him to accept his gift and reward him for it, according to the hadith of Aisha in Bukhari, who said: "The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, used to accept gifts and reward for them."

And the hadith of Ibn Umar in Ahmad, Abu Dawood, and Al-Nasa'i, who said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Whoever seeks refuge in God, grant him refuge, and whoever asks you in the name of God, give him, and whoever seeks protection in God, protect him, and whoever does you a favor, reward him, and if you do not find anything, then supplicate for him until you know that you have rewarded him."

This is between brothers, and it has nothing to do with the gifts of the subjects to the rulers, as they are like bribery, which is forbidden. And one of the rewards is to say: May God reward you with good. 

Al-Tirmidhi narrated from Usama bin Zaid, may God be pleased with them both, and said it is good and authentic, he said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Whoever has a favor done to him and says to the one who did it: "May God reward you with good," then he has exaggerated in the praise." And praise is gratitude, i.e., reward, especially from someone who finds nothing else, as Ibn Hibban narrated in his Sahih from Jabir bin Abdullah, who said: I heard the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, say: "Whoever is given a favor and does not find anything better than praise for it, then he has thanked him, and whoever conceals it has disbelieved, and whoever adorns himself with falsehood is like one who wears two garments of falsehood." And with a good chain of narrators, Al-Tirmidhi narrated from Jabir bin Abdullah, who said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Whoever is given a gift and finds something to repay it with, let him repay it, and if he does not find anything, let him praise it, for whoever praises it has thanked him, and whoever conceals it has disbelieved, and whoever adorns himself with what he has not been given is like one who wears two garments of falsehood." And disbelieving in the gift means concealing and covering it up. 

With an authentic chain of narrators, Abu Dawood and Al-Nasa'i narrated from Anas, who said: "The Muhajirun said, "O Messenger of God, the Ansar have taken all the reward, we have not seen a people who are better at giving a lot, nor better at consoling in a little than them, and they have spared us the burden," he said: "Do you not praise them for it and supplicate for them?" They said: "Yes," he said: "That is for that." 

A Muslim should be grateful for the little as he is grateful for the much, and be grateful to the people who do him good, as Abdullah bin Ahmad narrated in his additions with a good chain of narrators from Al-Nu'man bin Bashir, who said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Whoever is not grateful for the little, is not grateful for the much, and whoever is not grateful to the people, is not grateful to God, and talking about God's blessings is gratitude, and leaving it is disbelief, and the group is mercy, and division is torment."

It is Sunnah to intercede for one's brother for a benefit of righteousness or to facilitate a difficulty, as Al-Bukhari narrated from Abu Musa, who said: "The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, was sitting when a man came asking, or seeking a need, he turned his face to us and said, "Intercede, so that you may be rewarded, and God will decree on the tongue of His Prophet what He wills."

And as Muslim narrated from Ibn Umar from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, who said: "Whoever is a connection for his Muslim brother to a person of authority for a benefit of righteousness or to facilitate a difficulty, will be helped to cross the Path on the day when feet slip."

It is also recommended for a Muslim to defend the honor of his brother behind his back, as Al-Tirmidhi narrated and said this is a good hadith from Abu Al-Darda' from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, who said: "Whoever defends the honor of his brother, God will ward off the fire from his face on the Day of Resurrection." This hadith of Abu Al-Darda' was narrated by Ahmad, and he said its chain of narrators is good, and Al-Haythami said the same. 

And what Ishaq bin Rahwayh narrated from Asma bint Yazid, who said: I heard the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, say: "Whoever defends the honor of his brother behind his back, it is a right upon God to free him from the Fire." 

Al-Quda'i narrated in Musnad al-Shihab from Anas, who said: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "Whoever supports his brother behind his back, God will support him in this world and the hereafter." Al-Quda'i also narrated it from Imran bin Hussein with the addition: "And he is able to support him." And as Abu Dawood and Al-Bukhari narrated in Al-Adab Al-Mufrad, and Al-Zain Al-Iraqi said: Its chain of narrators is good from Abu Hurairah that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: "The believer is the mirror of the believer, and the believer is the brother of the believer, from wherever he meets him, he protects him from his loss and surrounds him from behind."

O Muslims:

You have learned from the noble Prophetic hadiths mentioned in this episode and the previous episode that it is Sunnah for whoever loves a brother for the sake of God to inform him and let him know that he loves him. It is also Sunnah for a Muslim to supplicate for his brother behind his back. It is also Sunnah for him to ask his brother to supplicate for him. It is Sunnah for him to visit him, sit with him, keep in touch with him, and share with him for the sake of God after loving him. It is recommended for a Muslim to meet his brother with what he likes to please him with that. It is recommended for a Muslim to give gifts to his brother. It is also recommended for him to accept his gift and reward him for it.

A Muslim should be grateful to the people who do him good. It is Sunnah to intercede for one's brother for a benefit of righteousness or to facilitate a difficulty. It is also recommended for him to defend the honor of his brother behind his back. So why don't we adhere to these Sharia rulings and all the rulings of Islam, so that we may be as our Lord loves and is pleased with, so that He may change what is within us, improve our conditions, and we may win the best of this world and the hereafter?! 

Dear listeners: Listeners of the Media Office Radio of Hizb ut-Tahrir: 

We will suffice with this amount in this episode, with the understanding that we will complete our reflections in the coming episodes, God willing. Until that time and until we meet you, we leave you in God's care, protection, and security. We thank you for your kind listening, and peace, mercy, and blessings of God be upon you. 

Know, O Muslims! - Episode 15
November 14, 2025

Know, O Muslims! - Episode 15

Know, O Muslims!

Episode 15

Among the assisting bodies of the Khilafah state are the ministers whom the Caliph appoints to assist him in bearing the burdens of the Khilafah and fulfilling its responsibilities. The multitude of the Khilafah's burdens, especially as the Khilafah state grows and expands, makes it difficult for the Caliph to bear them alone, so he needs someone to help him bear them to fulfill its responsibilities. However, it is not correct to call them ministers without restriction, so that the meaning of the minister in Islam, which is in the sense of an assistant, is not confused with the meaning of the minister in the current man-made systems based on democratic, capitalist, secular, or other systems that we witness in the present era.